Институциональные Детерминанты Промышленной Политики: Кластерный Анализ Стран Мира

• Authors: Deineko Liudmyla , Tsyplitska Olena

Title variants

EN

Institutional Determinants Of Industrial Policy: World Country-Cluster Analysis

• Languages of publication: RU

Abstracts

EN

Industrial policy plays a great role in modern strategies of economic development due to global challenges and increasing world competition. The goal of the paper is the determination of institutional factors of industrial policy implementation and groups of countries with the similar institutional environment using cluster analysis. The institutional determinants defining industrial development include cultural values (indulgence vs restraint, long-term orientation vs short-term orientation), prevalence of Putnam’s social groups, governance effectiveness and democracy regime, low level of corruption, efficient legislation, liberal base of economy, and high level of property rights protection. These determinants can be represented in 8 world indicators calculated by international organizations and G. Hofstede: 1) the level of society liberalization score; 2) society long-term orientation score; 3) Democracy Index; 4) Corruption Perception Index; 5) Property Rights Index; 6) Ease of Doing Business Rank; 7) Institutions index as a component of Global Index of Competitiveness; 8) Government Effectiveness (WGI). On the appropriate data of 76 countries of the world we obtained 9 clusters of countries with similar institutional parameters for industrial policy implementation. 2 groups contain highly developed countries; 4 groups contain predominantly transformation economies, and 3 groups consist of developing countries with low and low-middle income. As it turned out these countries have also similar macroeconomic indicators and some other institutional aspects like religion and trust in government. The distinction of countries on their institutional indicators is a base for development of the certain type of industrial policy (technological modernization, innovative, protectionism etc.), which is aimed on the dynamic industrial development.

Keywords

EN

industrial policy; economic and political institutes; social institutes; cultural institues; cluster analysis; institutional determinants; economic development

• Publisher: Wyższa Szkoła Ekonomiczno-Humanistyczna w Bielsku-Białej
• Journal: MIND Journal
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 7
• Pages: 1-16

Contributors

author

Deineko Liudmyla

author

Tsyplitska Olena

References

• Айвазов С.Ю. (2012). Классификация стран по основным показателям развития алмазного рынка. Экономические науки. №5 (90). С. 162–166
• Дзюбановська Н.В. (2016) Застосування кластерного аналізу для оцінки міжнародної торгівлі країн Європейського Союзу. Наукові записки Національного університету «Острозька академія». Серія: Економіка. Вип. 3. С. 204–208
• Длугопольський О.В. (2012). Інституційний вимір розвитку соціального капіталу: теоретико-методичні та прикладні аспекти. Економіка України, №12/2012. С. 17–29
• Кузнецова Н.В. (2015). Кластерный анализ стран Азиатско-Тихоокеанского региона. Actual problems of economics. #6 (168). С. 74–83
• Полтерович В.М. (2001). Присвоение ренты, налоговая политика и экономический рост. Препринт #2001/025. М.: Российская экономическая школа. 43 с.
• Розвиток промисловості для забезпечення зростання та оновлення української економіки: науково­аналітична доповідь (2018). За ред. д­ра екон. наук Дейнеко Л.В.; НАН України, К.: ДУ «Ін­т екон. та прогнозув. НАН України». 158 с.
• Тилли Ч. (2009). Принуждение, капитал и европейские государства. 990–1992 гг. М.: ИД «Территория будущего». 328 с.
• Democracy index 2017: Free Speech under Attack (2017). URL: https://www.eiu.com/public/topical_report.aspx?campaignid=DemocracyIndex2017
• Grein F. Andreas, Prakash S. Sethi, Tatum G. Lawrence (2010). A Dynamic Analysis of Country Clusters, the Role of Corruption, and Implications for Global Firms. Journal of Economics and Business. Vol. XIII, No 2. Amsterdam: Elsevier. P. 33–60
• Heshmati A., Kim N.­S. (2017). The Relationship between Economic Growth and Democracy: Alternative Representations and Rechnological Change. IZA Institute of Labour Economics. URL: http://ftp.iza.org/dp10880.pdf
• Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. (2010). Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind. Intercultural Cooperation and Its Importance for Survival. New York: McGraw Hill. 561 p.
• Human Development Indices and Iindicators. 2018 Statistical Update (2018). New York: UNDP Program. 112 p.
• Landes D. S. (1998). The Wealth and Poverty of Nations: Why Some Are So Rich and Others Are So Poor. New York: W.W.Norton&Co. 650 p.
• Weingast, B. R. (2009). Why Developing Countries Prove So Resistant to the Rule of Law. Working Paper No. 382. Stanford: Stanford Center for International Development. 21 p.

Identifiers

DOI

https://doi.org/10.36228/MJ.7/2019.12