PL EN


2015 | 18 | 185-197
Article title

The written text in the Athenian political culture in the first decades of 4th century BC

Authors
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The growing impact of textuality in the classical Greece seems to be generally accepted view. However, the importance of the written text as an autonomous mean of transmission in different spheres of life in Athens in the IV century BC is more complex phenomenon. The purpose of this paper is to present a general sketch of this issue with particular emphasis on politics and individuals whose ambition was to have a real impact on the current affairs. In this context the activity of Isocrates and his self-consciousness provides especially interesting material for debate.
Keywords
Year
Issue
18
Pages
185-197
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Uniwersytet Jagielloński
References
  • Adams Ch. D., 1912, ‘Are the political „speeches” of Demosthenes to be regarded as political pamphlets?’, Transactions and Proceedings of the American Philological Association 43, pp. 5-22.
  • Gagarin M., 2002, Antiphon the Athenian: Oratory, law, and justice in the age of the Sophists, Austin.
  • Hansen H. M., 1999, Demokracja ateńska w czasach Demostenesa, tłum. R. Kulesza, Warszawa.
  • Harris W. V., 1989, Ancient literacy, Cambridge–London.
  • Haskins E. V., 2004, Logos and power in Isocrates and Aristotle, Columbia.
  • Havelock E. A., 1963, A preface to Plato, Cambridge.
  • Havelock E. A., 1982, The literate revolution in Greece and its consequences, Princeton.
  • Janik J., 2005, ‘Textual tradition of Plato’s dialogues: Making, editing, circulating’, [in:] C. Galewicz (ed.), Texts of power. The power of the text: Readings in textual authority, Kraków, pp. 33-42.
  • Janik J., 2012, Political concepts of Isocrates, Kraków.
  • Lord A. B., 1960, The singer of Tales, Cambridge.
  • McLuhan, M., 1962, The Gutenberg galaxy: The making of typografic man, Toronto.
  • Michelini, A.N., 1998, ‘Isocrates’ civic invective: ACHARNIANS and ON THE PEACE’, Transactions of the American Philological Association 128, pp. 115-133.
  • Nails D., 1995, Agora, Academy, and the conduct of philosophy, Dortrecht–Boston–London.
  • Ong W. J., 1982, Orality and literacy: The technologizing of the word, London.
  • Parry M., 1928, L’épithète traditionelle chez Homère, Paris.
  • Parry M., 1971, The making of Homeric verse: The collected papers of Milman Parry, Oxford.
  • Pendrick G. J. (ed., trans., comment.), 2002, Antiphon. The Sophist. The Fragment, Cambrigde.
  • Rzymowska L., 2004, ‘O języku Demostenesa w świetle uwarunkowań komunikacji politycznej w Atenach w IV w. p.n.e.’, Bulletin de la Sociétè Polonaise de Linquistique LX, pp. 169-181.
  • Thomas R., 1996, Literacy and the city-state in the archaic and classical Greece, [in:] A. K. Bowman, G. Woolf (eds.), Literacy & power in the ancient world, Cambridge, pp. 33-50.
  • Too You Lee, 1995, The rhetoric of identity in Isocrates, Cambridge
  • Trevett J., 1996, ‘Did Demosthenes publish his deliberative speeches?’, Hermes 124/4, pp. 425-441.
  • Turasiewicz R. (tłum, oprac.), 1991, Demostenes. Wybór mów, Wrocław–Warszawa– Kraków, pp. I-CXXXII.
  • Welch K. E., 1999, Electonic rhetoric: Classical hetoic, oralism, and new literacy, Cambridge–London.
  • Woolf G., 1996, Power and the spread of writing in the West, [in:] A. K. Bowman, G. Woolf (eds.), Literacy & power in the ancient world, Cambridge, pp. 84-98.
  • Worthington I., 1996, Greek oratory and the oral/literate division, [in:] I. Worthington (ed.), Voice into text: Orality and literacy in ancient Greece, Leiden– New York–Köln, pp. 165-177.
  • Worthington I., 2013, Demosthenes of Athens and the fall of classical Greece, Oxford.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-de2b5df2-ba2d-43aa-9b47-f930fd8f6ab0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.