Intertextuality reception in postmodernist discourse

• Authors: Bezrukov Andrey N.
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The main study subject of the article is intertextual postmodern text interaction with the legacy of Russian classics of XIX–XX centuries. A cultural dialogue being a semantic point of convergence of the text factual and ideological levels is in the focus of investigation. The purpose of the research undertaken is observation of the postmodern artistic unity transformational nature, represented by the projection of systemic/non-systemic writing/ /reading. Methodologically, the work is based on the receptive approach to identification of individual features of the text and its semantic correlates. The analysis allowed us to direct attention to intertextual variations, discursive imagery circumvolutions, presence of parallel and reverse vectors in the newly created texts. The concepts of the intertextual matrix situation put across are illustrated with the fictional examples (Pushkin, Dostoevsky, Yerofeyev). The article is intended (field of application) for the Russian and foreign researchers of the postmodern discourse, intertextual communication, literary forms dialogue, signimic level text transformed into a semantic construct. The analysis results posit that formal intertextuality character (citation scale) in the individual text concept expands to the phenomenon, bearing convergent characteristics, and the semantic field extension can be carried out with the help of the receptive approach.

Keywords

EN

intertext; postmodernism; reception of the text; discourse; dialogue; interpretation,; intertextuality; Alexander Pushkin; Venedikt Yerofeyev

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego
• Journal: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski
• Year: 2017
• Volume: 2
• Pages: 263-271

Dates

published

2017-11-01

Contributors

author

Bezrukov Andrey N.

• Birsk State University

References

• Arnold, I. V. [= Арнольд, И. В.] (1999), Семантика. Стилистика. Интертекстуальность. Санкт-Петербург.
• Bakhtin, M. M. [= Бахтин, М. М.] (2002), Собрание сочинений. Т. 6. Москва.
• Barthes, R. (1987), Criticism and truth. London.
• Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2009), Смысловое формирование в системе дискурса. В: Czapiga, A./Czapiga, Z. (red.), Коммуникативные аспекты грамматики и текста. Rzeszow, 289–299.
• Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2015), Рецепция художественного текста: функциональный подход. Вроцлав.
• Bezrukov, A. N. [= Безруков, А. Н.] (2016), Детерминация смысла «Благой вести» Вен.
• Ерофеева с позиций теории рецепции. В: Polilog. Studia Neofilologiczne. VI, 69–78.
• Derrida, J. (1978), Writing and Difference. London.
• Eco, U. (1984), Semiotics and the philosophy of language. Bloomington.
• Genette, G. (1997), Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree. Lincoln.
• Graham, A. (2000), Intertextuality. London.
• Graham, A. (2003), Roland Barthes. London.
• Greimas, A.J. (1983), Structural Semantics: An Attempt at a Method. Lincoln.
• Guattari, F. (2013), Schizoanalytic cartographies. London.
• Fateeva, N. A. [= Фатеева, Н. А.] (2007), Интертекст в мире текстов: контрапункт интертекстуальности. Москва.
• Holquist, M. (1990), Dialogism: Bakhtin and His World. London.
• Iser, W. (1976), The Act of Reading: A Theory of Aesthetic Response. Baltimore.
• Jameson, F. (2002), A Singular Modernity. Essay on the Ontology of the Present. London.
• Jauss, H.-R. (1982), Aesthetic experience and literary hermeneutics. Minneapolis.
• Jauss, H.-R. (1982), Toward an Aesthetic of Reception. Minneapolis.
• Kiebuzinska, C. (2001), Intertextual loops in modern drama. Madison.
• Kiklewicz, A. (2015), О коммуникативно-прагматических аспектах многозначности (2). В: Przegląd Wschodnioeuropejski. VI/1, 167–179.
• Korman, B. O. [= Корман, Б. О.] (2006), Теория литературы: избранные труды. Ижевск.
• Kristeva, J. (1984), Revolution in Poetic Language. New York.
• Kristeva, J. [= Кристева, Ю.] (2004), Избранные труды: Разрушение поэтики. Москва.
• Lipovetsky, M. N. (1999), Russian Postmodernist Fiction : Dialogue with Chaos. London.
• Piégay-Gros, N. [= Пьеге-Гро, Н.] (2008), Введение в теорию интертекстуальности. Москва.
• Pushkin, A. S. [= Пушкин, А. С.] (1993), Собрание сочинений. Т. 2. Санкт-Петербург.
• Smirnov, I. P. [= Смирнов, И. П.] (1995), Порождение интертекста (Элементы интертекстуального анализа с примерами из творчества Б. Л. Пастернака). Санкт-Петербург.
• Yampolskii, M. B. [= Ямпольский, М. Б.] (1993), Память Тиресия. Интертекстуальность и кинематограф. Москва.
• Yerofeyev, V. V. [= Ерофеев, В. В.] (2001), Собрание сочинений. T. 1. Москва.

Identifiers

ISSN

2081-1128