Econometric analysis of SMEs in Eurozone

• Authors: Stoklasová Radmila
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The purpose of this paper is to empirically investigate the relationship between labour productivity (LP) and government spending on research and development (R&D) in the Euro zone. In particular, its purpose is to investigate this relationship in the case of small and medium enterprises (SMEs). By utilizing causality tests and error correction models, the results suggest that support of research and development is the cause of labour productivity growth in the long-term period. However, for the short-term period changes in labour productivity precede changes in government spending on research and development. Based on the findings, the study has several theoretical and practical implications. The data sources were the Eurostat database. The data used have the character of annual time series in the period between 2004 and 2015. GRETL software was used for the calculations.

Keywords

EN

Error correction model; expenditure on R&D; Granger causality; labour productivity; regression analysis; small and medium-size enterprises solow model

• Publisher: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Akademii WSB
• Journal: Forum Scientiae Oeconomia
• Year: 2018
• Issue: Volume 6 (2018) Issue No. 1: Competitiveness of the modern organization: human, ethical and innovative aspects
• Pages: 19-30

Contributors

author

Stoklasová Radmila

References

• Arlt, T. (1999), Moderní metody modelování ekonomických časových řad, Praha: Grada.
• Arlt, T., Arltová, M. (2006), Ekonomické časové řady, Praha: Grada.
• Cappelen, Ĺ., Aknerud, A., Rybalka, M. (2012), The effects of R&D tax credits on patenting and innovations, Research Policy, 41: 334-345.
• Catozzella, A., Vivarelli, M. (2011), Beyond additionality: Are innovation subsidies counterproductive?, Bonn: IZA – Institute of Labour Economics DP No. 5746, available at: http://ftp.iza.org/dp5746.pdf (accessed 30 January 2018).
• Cerqua, A., Pellegrini, G. (2014), Do subsidies to private capital boost firms’ growth? A multiple regression discontinuity design approach, Journal of Public Economics, 109: 114-126.
• Cin, B.C., Kim, Y. J., Vonortas, N. S. (2014), The impact of government R&D subsidy on firm performance: Evidence from Korean SMEs, OECD Conference Entrepreneurship, Innovation and Enterprise Dynamics, December 1989, available at: http://w w w.oecd.org/sti/inno/5_3_Cin-Kim-Vonortas_Final.pdf (accessed 30 October 2017).
• Criscuolo, C., Martin, R., Overman, H., Reenen, J.V. (2012), The causal effects of an industrial policy, NBER Working Paper, No. 17842, National Bureau of Economic Research.
• Czarnitzki, D., Licht, G. (2006), Additionality of public R&D grants in a transition economy, The Economics of Transition, 14(1): 101-131.
• Einiö, E. (2014), R&D subsidies and company performance: Evidence from geographic variation in government funding based on the ERDF population-density rule, The Review of Economics and Statistics, 96(4): 710-728.
• Enders, W., Granger, C.W.J. (1998), Unitroot tests and asymmetric adjustment with an example using the term structure of interest rates, Journal of Business and Economic Statistics, 16: 304-311.
• European Commission (2015), Cíle strategie Evropa 2020, available at: http:// ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-a-nutshell/targets/index_cs.htm (accessed 25 April 2017).
• Eurostat (2017a), Gross domestic expenditure on R&D, available at: http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/tgm/table.do?tab=table&init=1&plugin=1&language=en &pcode=t2020_20 (accessed 25 April 2017).
• Eurostat (2017 b), available at: http://e c .e u r o p a .e u /e u r o s t a t /s t a t i s t i c s e xp l a i n e d / i n d e x . p h p / S t r u c t u r a l _ b u s iness_statistics_overview (accessed 30 October 2017).
• Garcia, A., Mohnen, P. (2010), Impact of government support on R&D and innovation, Maastricht: UNU-MERIT Working Paper 2010-034.
• González, X., Pazó, C. (2008), Do public subsidies stimulate private R&D spending?, Research Policy, 37: 371–389.
• Irwin, D.A., Klenow, P.J. (1996), High-tech R&D subsidies. Estimating the effects of Sematech, Journal of International Economics, 40: 323-344.
• Johansen, S. (1991), Estimation and hypothesis testing of cointegration vectors in Gaussian vector autoregressive models, Econometrica, 59(6): 1551-1580.
• Johansen, S. (1995), Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Karhunen, H., Huovari, J. (2015), R&D subsidies and productivity in SMEs, Small Business Economics, 45(4): 805-823.
• Koski, H., Pajarinen, M. (2015), Subsidies, the shadow of death and labor productivity, Journal of Industry, Competition and Trade, 15(2): 189-204.
• Lach, S. (2002), Do R&D subsidies stimulate or displace private R&D?, The Journal of Industrial Economics, 50: 369-390.
• Mach, M. (2001), Makroekonomie II, Praha: Melandrium.
• Ortega-Argilés, R., Vivarelli, M., Voigt, P. (2009), R&D in SMEs: a paradox?, Small Business Economics, 33: 3-11.
• Veber, J., Srpová, J. (2012), Podnikání malé a střední firmy, Praha: Grada.

Identifiers

DOI

10.23762/FSO_ vOL6NO1_18_6