Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2018 | 1 | 21-32

Article title

RESEARCH OF THE PROBLEM OF DIALOGUE EDUCATION IMPLEMENTATION IN THE FUTURE PRIMARY SCHOOL TEACHERS’ TRAINING PROCESS: PHILOSOPHICAL AND ANTHROPOLOGICAL APPROACH

Authors

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
The article defines the basic theoretical principles of philosophical and pedagogical anthropology in the organizing process of dialogue training of primary school teachers. The author analyzes the methodology of the outlined problem in the historical retrospective – from the ideas of ancient Greek philosophers to scientific works of modern scholars and teachers. The importance of implementing an anthropological approach to the organization of the dialogue training and education of the child is emphasized, particularly in the elementary school educational process. It is substantiated that philosophical and pedagogical anthropology allows to thoroughly analyze the essence of a person, her spiritual world; to realize the uniqueness of the inner world of each individual; to consider the idea according to which humanity has no future without proper unity, dialogue of cultures, interaction and communication, etc. The author argues that the implementation of the principle of dialogue in the educational process is a real change in the direction of activity: from knowledge - to creative thinking and human culture.

Contributors

  • Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University (Ukraine)

References

  • Abelyar, P.(1994) Istoriya moih bedstviy. In: Antologiya pedagogicheskoy myisli hristianskogo Srednevekovya (p. 302-304), vol.1, Moskva: AO Aspekt Press.
  • Andrushchenko, V. P. (2012). Rozdumy pro osvitu: filosofiia i metodolohiia. Kyiv: MP Lesia.
  • Aristotel (1983). Politika. Moskva: Myisl.
  • Bekh, I. D. (2015). Metodolohichnyi prostir suchasnoho vykhovnoho protsesu. In: Vybrani naukovi pratsi, vol. 1, Vykhovannia osobystosti (p. 600-650), Chernivtsi: Bukrek.
  • Budnyk, O. (2016). Educational Model of a Modern Student: European Scope. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University, 3, 2-3, 9-14, doi:10.15330/jpnu.3.2-3.9-14.
  • Budnyk, O. B. (2014). Profesiina pidhotovka maibutnoho uchytelia pochatkovoi shkoly do sotsialno-pedahohichnoi diialnosti: teoriia I metodyka. Dnipropetrovsk: Seredniak T. K.
  • Budnyk, O., Vasianovych, H. (2017). The Category of freedom in the written heritage of John Amos Comenius and Hryhoriy Skovoroda. Advanced Education,7, 85-89, doi: 10.20535/2410-8286.93517.
  • Bykov, V. Y. (2009). Modeli orhanizatsiinykh system vidkrytoi osvity. Kyiv: Atika.
  • Chardin, de T. (1987). Fenomen cheloveka. Moskva: Nauka.
  • Comenius, J. (1982). Izbrannyie pedagogicheskie sochineniya. Moskva: Pedagogika.
  • Danilov, M. A. (1971). Problemyi metodologii pedagogIki i metodiki issledovaniya. Moskva: Pedagogika.
  • Encyclopedia of Education (2008). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
  • Famuła-Jurczak, A., Mazur, P. (2012). Where is it going school?. In: B. Akimjaková, I. Rochovská (ed.), Tradition and Innovation in Special and Social Pedagogy (p. 83-101), Ružomberok: Verbum.
  • God, B. V. (2004). Vihovannya v epohu Evropeyskogo VIdrodzhennya (seredina HIV – pochatok HVII stolIttya). Poltava: ASMI.
  • Gusserl, E. (2009). Idei chistoy fenomenologii i fenomenologicheskoy filosofii. Moskva: Akademich. proekt.
  • Honcharenko, S. (1997). Ukrainskyi pedahohichnyi slovnyk. Kyiv: Lybid.
  • Honcharenko, S. U. (2008). Metodolohiia. In: Entsyklopediia osvity (p. 498-500), Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
  • Honcharenko, S. U. (2012). Metodolohichni zasady pobudovy pedahohichnoi teorii. Profesiina osvita: pedahohika i psykholohiia: ukrainsko-polskyi shchorichnyk, 14, 37-50.
  • Kremen, V., Tkachenko V. (1998). Ukraina: shliakh do sebe: problemy suspilnoi transformatsii. Kyiv: Dr. Ukr.
  • Mazur, P. (2017). Personalistic management in education. In: B. Tiganoaia, A. Pavlicek (ed.), System approaches’17. Can the system approach be useful in solving current problems of modern technologies? (p. 79-83), Prague, doi: 10.18267/pr.2017.pav.2247.0-12.
  • Mazur, P. Miterka, E. (2012). Formation of the new challenge of modern pedagogy of human education. In: B. Akimjaková et al. (ed.), Antropology in Special and Therapeutical Pedagogy (p. 47-52), Fribourg.
  • Monten, M. (1991). Opyityi. Moskva: Nauka.
  • Novykov, A. (2005). Metodologiya uchebnoy deyatelnosti. Moskva.
  • Pedahohichna maisternist (1997). Kyiv: Vyshcha shk.
  • Pestalozzi, J. (1981). Izbrannyie pedagogicheskie sochineniya. Moskva: Pedagogika.
  • Platon (1996). Dialogi. Moskva: Myisl.
  • Schedrovitskiy, G. P. (1993). Sistema pedagogicheskih issledovaniy (metodologicheskiy analiz). Pedagogika i logika. Moskva: Kistal.
  • Scheler, M. (1994). Izbrannyie proizvedeniya. Moskva: Gnozis.
  • Serikov, G. N. (2006). Pedagogika. Moskva: Gumanitar.
  • Slovar inostrannyih slov (1988). Moskva: Rus. yaz.
  • Sychyvytsia, O. (2001). Metodolohiia ta filosofiia. In: M. A. Skrypnyk, Z. E. Skrypnyk (ed.), Predmet i problematyka filosofii (p. 291-315), Lviv: Lviv. bank. Instytut Natsionalnoho banku Ukrainy.
  • Ushinskiy, K. (2004). Chelovek kak predmet vospitaniya: Opyit pedagogicheskoy antropologii. Moskva: FAIR-PRESS.
  • Vasianovych, H. P. (2015). Metodolohichni konteksty pedahohichnoi nauky na suchasnomu etapi yii rozvytku. In: Vybrani tvory, vol. 7 (p. 164-186), Lviv: Norma.
  • Zagvyazinskiy, V. I. (2006). Metodologiya i metodyi psihologo-pedagogicheskogo issledovaniya. Moskva: Izd. tsentr Akademiya.
  • Zyazyun, I. A. (2004). Filosofiia pedahohichnoho svitohliadu. In: Profesiina osvita: pedahohika i psykholohiia ukrainsko-polskyi, polsko-ukrainskyi zhurnal, 6, 209-231.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e0c6aee2-ba42-41b9-b8e6-8b4eff4bdd8d
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.