Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2014 | 26 | 95-126

Article title

Problem sprawiedliwości Bożej w świetle Listu do Rzymian

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
The Problem of God’s Justice in the Letter to the Romans

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
In the present article, the author indicates the theme of God’s justice as a unifying thread of the Letter to the Romans. The analysis of the issue starts from a general overview of the idea of justice in the Greco-Roman culture, in the Old and New Testament. Next, the author presents the overall structure of the Letter to the Romans supplied with the distribution of the vocabulary of justice. The core of the article is the analysis of the differentiated argumentative parts of the letter (Rom 1–4; 5–8; 9–11) with the special attention paid to the issue of God’s justice. Paul presents it as the power of God that saves the humanity from the incoming judgment (Rom 1–4), as the giver of new life in the Spirit and freedom for the believers (Rom 5–8), and as the creative will of God that will not cease until it brings everybody, including Israel, to salvation (Rom 9–11). At every stage of his argument, the apostle stresses that throughout the whole history of mankind God’s justice remained faithful to its original plan of salvation revealed and disclosed in the Old Testament.

Journal

Year

Volume

26

Pages

95-126

Physical description

References

  • Aageson J.W. , „Scripture and Structure in the Development of the Argument in Romans 9–11”, CBQ 48 (1986) 265-289
  • Abasciano B J. , Paul’s Use of the Old Testament in Romans 9:1-9. An Intertextual and Theological Exegesis (London – New York 2011)
  • Aletti J.-N. „La présence d’un modèle rhétorique en Romains: Son rôle et son importance”, Bib 71 (1990) 1-24.
  • Aletti J.-N., „The Rhetoric of Romans 5–8,” The Rhetorical Analysis of Scripture. Essays from the 1995 London Conference (red. S.E. Porter – T.H. Olbricht) (Sheffield 1997) 294-308
  • Aletti J.-N., God’s Justice in Romans. Keys for Interpreting the Epistle to the Romans (SB 37; Roma 2010)
  • Aletti, J.-N., „Rm 1,18–3,20. Incohérence ou cohérence de l’argumentation paulinienne?”, Bib 69 (1988) 47-62
  • Badenas R. , Christ the End of the Law: Romans 10.4 in Pauline Perspective (JSNTSup 10; Sheffield 1985)
  • Barrett C.K., The Epistle to the Romans (London 1991)
  • Basta P. , Abramo in Romani 4. L’analogia dell’agire divino nella ricerca esegetica di Paolo (AnBib 168; Roma 2007).
  • Baxter A.G. – Ziesler J.A., „Paul and Arboriculture: Romans 11.17–24”, JSNT 24 (1985) 25-32
  • Beale G.K., „An Exegetical and Theological Consideration of the Hardening of Pharaoh’s Heart in Exodus 4–14 and Romans 9”, TrinJ 5 (1984) 129–54.
  • Beasley-Murray G. R. , „The Righteousness of God in the History of Israel and the Nations: Romans 9–11”, RevExp 73 (1976) 437-450
  • Beker J.C. , „The Faithfulness of God and the Priority of Israel in Paul’s Letter to the Romans,” HTR 79 (1986) 14-15
  • Bell R.H., The Irrevocable Call of God. An Inquiry into Paul’s Theology of Israel (WUNT II/184; Tübingen 2005)
  • Belli F., Argumentation and Use of Scripture in Romans 9-11 (AnBib 183; Roma 2010)
  • Bourke M.M. , A Study of the Metaphor of the Olive Tree in Romans xi (Washington, DC 1947)
  • Braaten L.J., „The Groaning Creation. The Biblical Background for Romans 8:22”, BR 1 (2005) 19-39
  • Cambier J. , „Le ‘Moi’ dans Rom. 7,” The Law of the Spirit in Rom 7 and 8 (red. L. de Lorenzi) (Benedictina, Biblical-Ecumenical Section 1; Rome 1976) 13-72
  • Campbell D.H. , „The Identity of «egō» in Romans 7,7-25”, Studia Biblia 1978: Sixth International Congress on Biblical Studies, III: Paper on Paul and Other New Testament Authors (red. E.A. Livingston) (JSNTSup 3; Sheffield 1980) 57-64
  • Campbell W.S., „The Freedom and Faithfulness of God in Relation to Israel”, JSNT 13 (1981) 27-45
  • Cranfield C.E.B. , A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. Volume II: Commentary on Romans IX – XVI and Essays (London – New York 2004)
  • Cranfield C.E.B., A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. Volume I: Introduction and commentary on Romans I–VIII (London – New York 2004)
  • Cremer H. , Die paulinische Rechtfertigungslehre im Zusammenhänge ihrer geschichtlichen Vorausetzungen (Gütersloh 1900)
  • Donfried K.P. (red.) The Romans Debate. Revised and Expanded Edition (Peabody, MA 1991)
  • Dubarle A.-M. , „Le Gémissement des créatures dans l’ordre divin du cosmos (Rom. 8,19-22)”, RSPT 38 (1954) 445-465.
  • Dunn J.D.G. , Romans 1–8 (WBC 38A; Dallas, TX 1988)
  • Ellison H. L. , The Mystery of Israel: An Exposition of Romans 9–11 (Grand Rapids, MI: Eerdmans, 1966; Exeter, UK: Paternoster, 1976)
  • Evans C.A. , „Paul and the Hermeneutics of ‘True Prophecy’: A Study of Romans 9–11,” Bib 65 (1984) 560-570
  • Fitzmyer J.A., Romans: A New Translation with Introduction and Commentary (AB 33; New Haven 1993)
  • Garlington D.B., Faith, Obedience, and Perseverance. Aspects of Paul’s Letter to the Romans (WUNT II/79; Tübingen 1994)
  • Gieniusz Andrzej , Romans 8:18-30. Suffering Does Not Thwart the Future Glory (Atlanta, GA 1999).
  • Gignac A. „Le Christ, TÉLOS de la loi (Rm 10,4), une lecture en termes de continuité et de discontinuité, dans le cadre du paradigme Paulinien de l'élection”, ScEs 46 (1994) 55-81.
  • Heil J.P. , „From Remnant to Seed of Hope for Israel: Romans 9:27-29”, CBQ 64 (2002) 703-720
  • Howard G.E., „Christ the End of the Law: The Meaning of Romans 10:4ff.”, JBL 88 (1969) 331-337
  • Jervis L.A., The Purpose of Romans: A Comparative Letter Structure Investigation (JSNTSup 55; Sheffield 1991)
  • Jewett R. , Romans. A Commentary on the Book of Romans (Hermeneia; Minneapolis, MN 2007)
  • Johnson E. E. , The Function of Apocalyptic and Wisdom Traditions in Romans 9–11 (SBLDS 109; Atlanta, GA 1989)
  • Johnson E.E. , „The Faithfulness and Impartiality of God”, Pauline Theology. Vol. 3: Romans (red. D.M. Hay – E.E. Johnson) (Minneapolis 1995) 211-239
  • Johnson L.T. , Reading Romans. A Literary and Theological Commentary (Macon, GA 2001)
  • Käsemann E. , „Gottesgerechtigkeit bei Paulus“, ZThK 58 (1961) 367-378; tenże, Perspectives on Paul (Philadelphia 1971)
  • Kertelge K., „dikaiosynē”, Exegetical Dictionary of the New Testament (red. H. Balz – G. Schneider) (Edinburgh 1990) I, 328;
  • Koch D.-A., Die Schrift als Zeuge des Evangeliums: Untersuchungen zur Verwendung und zum Verständnis der Schrift bei Paulus (BHT 69; Tübingen 1986)
  • Kowalski Marcin, „Wiara w Chrystusa jako jedyna droga zbawienia. Analiza retoryczna Rz 1 – 4”, Kieleckie Studia Teologiczne 11 (2012) 91-112.
  • Kowalski Marcin, «Abyśmy się stali w nim sprawiedliwością Bożą» (2 Kor 5,21b). Zarys Pawłowej nauki o usprawiedliwieniu i jej eklezjalne implikacje”, Kościół komunia i dialog. Księdzu Biskupowi Kazimierzowi Ryczanowi w 75. Rocznicę urodzin (red. P. Kantyka – J. Czerkawski – T. Siemieniec) (Kielce 2014) 133-146.
  • Kraus W. , Der Tod Jesu als Heiligtumsweihe. Eine Untersuchung zum Umfeld der Sühnevorstellung in Römer 3,25–26a (WMANT 66; Neukirchen-Vluyn 1991)
  • Kümmel W.G. , Romer 7 und das Bild des Menschen im Neuen Testament (Münich 1974)
  • Lambrecht J. , „The Groaning Creation: A Study of Rom 8:18–30”, LS 15 (1990) 3-18
  • Lambrecht J., „Man Before and Without Christ: Rom 7 and Pauline Anthropology”, LS 5 (1974–75) 18-33
  • Lambrecht J., The Wretched “I” and Its Liberation. Paul in Romans 7 and 8 (Louvain Theological and Pastoral Monographs 14; Louvain 1992)
  • Loane M.L. , The Hope of Glory. An Exposition of the Eighth Chapter of the Epistle to the Romans (London 1968)
  • Lohse E. , „Zur Analyse und Interpretation von Röm. 8,1-17”, The Law of the Spirit in Rom 7 and 8 (red. L. de Lorenzi) (Benedictina, Biblical-Ecumenical Section 1; Rome 1976) 129-166.
  • Lyonnet S., „Christian Freedom and the Law of the Spirit According to Paul”, The Christian Lives by the Spirit (red. I. de la Potterie – S. Lyonnet) (Staten Island, NY 1971) 145-174
  • Maillot A. , „Essai sur les citations vétérotestamentaires contenues dans Romains 9 à 11, ou comment se servir de la Torah pour montrer que le «Christ est la fin de la Torah»” ETR 57 (1982) 55-73
  • Maston J., Divine and Human Agency in Second Temple Judaism and Paul (WUNT II/297; Tübingen 2010) 127-152.
  • Meeks W., „On Trusting an Unpredictable God. A Hermeneutical Meditation on Romans 9-11”, In Search of the Early Christians. Selected Essays (red. W.A. Meeks – A.R. Hilton) (New Haven – London 2002) 210 - 229.
  • Moo D.J. , The Epistle to the Romans (NICNT; Grand Rapids, MI 1996)
  • Nanos M.N. , „Broken Branches: A Pauline Metaphor Gone Awry? (Romans 11:11-24)”, Between Gospel and Election. Explorations in the Interpretation of Romans 9-11 (red. F. Wilk – J. R. Wagner) (WUNT II/257; Tübingen 2010) 339-376
  • Paulsen H., Überlieferung und Auslegung in Römer 8 (WMANT 43; Neukirchen-Vluyn 1974)
  • Piper J. , „The Demonstration of the Righteousness of God in Romans 3:25,26”, JSNT 7 (1980) 2-32
  • Pluta A. , Gottes Bundestreue: ein Schlüsselbegriff in Röm 3, 25a (Stuttgart 1969)
  • Quell G. „dikē”, Theological Dictionary of the New Testament (red. G. Kittel – G. Friedrich; tł. G.W. Bromiley) (Grand Rapids 1964) II, 174
  • Räisänen H., „Paul, God, and Israel: Romans 9–11 in Recent Research,” The Social World of Formative Christianity and Judaism: Essays in Tribute to Howard Clark Kee (red. J. Neusner et al.) (Philadelphia, PA 1988) 178-206
  • Refoulé F. , „Unité de l’épître aux Romains et histoire du salut”, RSPT 71 (1987) 219-242
  • Refoulé F., „Romains, x, 4: Encore une fois”, RB 91 (1984) 321-350
  • Schreiner T.R. , Romans (BECNT; Grand Rapids, MI 1998)
  • Scott J. M. , Adoption as Sons of God: An Exegetical Investigation into the Background of “Huiothesia” in the Pauline Corpus (WUNT II/48; Tübingen 1992) 221-266
  • Seifrid M.A. , „Paul’s Approach to the Old Testament in Rom 10:6–8”, TrinJ 6 (1985) 3-37
  • Seifrid M.A. , „The Subject of Rom 7:14-25”, NovT 34 (1992) 313-333
  • Siegert F. , Argumentation bei Paulus gezeigt an Röm 9–11 (WUNT II/34; Tübingen 1985) 108-247.
  • Spicq C., „diakaios”, Theological Lexicon of the New Testament (tł. i red. J.D. Ernest) (Peabody, MA 1994) I, 318
  • Stanley C.D., Paul and the Language of Scripture: Citation Technique in the Pauline Epistles and Contemporary Literature (SNTSMS 69; Cambridge 1992)
  • Stowers S.K., „Romans 7:7–25 as a Speech-in-Character (prosōpopoiia)”, Paul in His Hellenistic Context (red. T. Engberg-Pedersen) (Minneapolis 1995) 180-202
  • Stuhlmacher P., „Das Ende des Gesetzes: Über Ursprung und Ansatz der paulinischen Theologie”, ZTK 67 (1970) 14-39
  • Tobin T.H. , Paul’s Rhetoric in Its Context. The Argument of Romans (Peabody, MA 2004)
  • van Rensburg J.J.J. , „The Children of God in Romans 8”, Neot. 15 (1981) 139-179
  • van Spanje T.E. , Inconsistency in Paul? A Critique of the Work of Heikki Räisänen (WUNT II/110; Tübingen 1999)
  • von der Osten-Sacken P. , Römer 8 als Beispiel paulinischer Soteriologie (FRLANT 112; Göttingen 1975)
  • Wagner J.R. , Heralds of the Good News. Isaiah and Paul „in Concert” in the Letter to the Romans (Leiden 2002)
  • Wakefield A.H. , „Romans 9-11. The Sovereignty of God and the Status of Israel”, RevExp 100/1 (2003) 65 80.
  • Wedderburn A.J.M., The Reasons for Romans (Edinburgh 1991)
  • Witherington B., III, Paul’s Letter to the Romans. A Socio-Rhetorical Commentary (Grand Rapids, MI – Cambridge, UK 2004)
  • Zeller D., “Sühne und Langmut. Zur Traditionsgeschichte von Röm 3:2–26”, ThPh 3 (1968) 57-58

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e0fd9245-acc0-4f11-ac24-2de3b3679347
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.