Niedookreśloność znaczeniowa idiomów z perspektywy semantyki kognitywnej i jej implikacje dla frazeografii

• Authors: Sulikowska Anna

Title variants

EN

On meaning ambiguity of idioms in scope of cognitive semantics and its implications for the phraseography

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

One of the most important and most complex research tasks within phraseology and phraseography is the description of the meaning of idioms. Idioms are, as seen from the semantic point of view, especially complicated language units. They contain a semantic added value which results from two aspects: (i) their ambiguity based on feedback between the literal and the lexicalized meaning, (ii) their polylexicality – their semantic derivations can occur on the level of the word group and also concern the individual elements. The aim of the article is to characterize the semantic potential of idioms and to try its explication.

Keywords

EN

idioms; ambiguity; cognitive semantics

• Publisher: Instytut Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej
• Journal: Applied Linguistics Papers
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 25/3
• Pages: 61-77

Dates

published

2018

Contributors

author

Sulikowska Anna

• Uniwersytet Szczeciński

References

• Croft, W. (2003), The role of domains in the interpretation of metaphors and metonymies, (w:) R. Dirven/ R. Pörings (red.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/ New York, 161–206.
• Barsalou, L.W. (1999), Perceptual symbol systems, (w:) „Behavioral and brain sciences” 22, 577–660.
• Barsalou, L.W. (2012), The Human Conceptual System, (w:) M. J. Spivey/ K. McRae/M.F. Joanisse (red.), The Cambridge Handbook of Psycholinguistics. Cambridge, 239–258.
• Goosens, L. (2003), Metaphtonymy: The interaction of metaphor and metonymy in expressions for linguistic action, (w:) R. Dirven/ R. Pörings (red.), Metaphor and Metonymy in Comparison and Contrast. Berlin/ New York, 349–378.
• Kardela, H. (2006), Metodologia językoznawstwa kognitywnego, (w:) P. Stalmaszczyk (red.), Metodologie językoznawstwa ogólnego. Podstawy teoretyczne. Łódź, 196–233.
• Kövecses, Z. (2002), Metaphor. A practical introduction. New York.
• Lakoff, G./ M. Johnson (1980), Metaphors we live by. Chicago.
• Langacker, R.W. (2009), Gramatyka kognitywna. Wprowadzenie. Kraków.
• Pajdzińska, A. (2008), Językowy obraz świata a metafora artystyczna, (w:) „Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis” 20, 241–252.
• Radden, G./ Z. Kövecses (1999), Towards a Theory of Metonymy, (w): K.-U. Panther/G. Radden (red.), Metonymy in Language and Thought. Amsterdam, 18–59.
• Taylor, J. R. (2007), Gramatyka kognitywna. Kraków.
• DUW = Duden Universalwörterbuch online. (URL https://www.duden.de).
• DWDS = Das digitale Wörterbuch der deutschen Sprache. (URL http://www.dwds.de).
• PONS = Pons.eu. Słownik internetowy. (URL http://www.pons.eu).
• PWN = Wiktorowicz, J./ A. Frączek (red.) (2010), Großwörterbuch PWN deutschpolnisch. Warszawa.
• redensarten-index = www.redensarten-index.de. (URL https://www.redensarten-index.de).

Identifiers

ISSN

2544-9354