Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 53 | 1(211) | 65-84

Article title

O społecznej konstrukcji wiedzy na przykładzie tradycji europejskich badań nad technologią Ch. Freemana

Content

Title variants

The social construction of knowledge on the example of Ch. Freeman’s European tradition of European tradition of technology research

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Autor artykułu podejmuje próbę rekonstrukcji naukowej aktywności Christophera Freemana w obszarze innowacyjności. Przedstawiona zostanie genealogia, zainicjowanej przez brytyjskiego ekonomistę, tzw. europejskiej tradycji myśli nad technologią. Analiza zostanie dokonana w kontekście współpracy Freemana z organizacją OECD. Zgodnie z przyjętym przez autora konstruktywistycznym modelem poznania, procesy wiedzotwórcze są zawsze uwikłane w złożone relacje społeczne, związane m.in. z osiągnięciem przez jednostkę indywidualnego zwycięstwa naukowego. Niniejszy artykuł jest próbą rekonstrukcji takiego uwikłania. Wskazane zostaną więc te właściwości koncepcji innowacji opracowanej przez Freemana, które nie mają odpowiedniego umocowania empirycznego i nie realizują heurystycznych oraz teleologicznych cech poznania naukowego.
EN
The article is an attempt to reconstruct the scientific activity of Christopher Freeman in the area of innovations. The genealogy of European tradition, initiated by the British economist, will be described. The main context of analysis will be Freeman’s involvment in the cooperation with OECD. According to accepted by the author construstivist model of epistemology, the process of knowledge creation is always involved in complicated social relations, connected among others with achieving the individual scientific victory. This article is an attempt to reconstruct such entanglement. Therefore, there will be indicated the properties of the concept of innovation developed by Freeman, which do not have adequate empirical legitimacy nor perform heuristic and teleological characteristics of scientific knowledge.

Year

Volume

53

Issue

Pages

65-84

Physical description

Dates

published
2017-04

Contributors

  • Instytut Społeczno-Humanistyczny, Państwowa Wyższa Szkoła Informatyki i Przedsiębiorczości w Łomży

References

  • Barnett, H.G., 1953, Innovation: the Basis of Cultural Change, New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Bourdieu, P., 1984, Specyfika dziedziny naukowej i społeczne warunki rozwoju wiedzy, t. 2, w: E. Mokrzycki, red., Kryzys i schizma, Warszawa: PIW.
  • Bowker, G.C., Star, S.L., 1999, Sorting Things Out: Classifications and its Consequences, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Carter, C.F., Williams, B.R., 1957, Industry and Technical Progress: Factors Governing the Speed of Application of Science, London: Oxford University Press.
  • Fagerberg, J., Fosaas, M. i in., 2011, Christopher Freeman: Social Science Entrepreneur, Centre for Technology, Innovation and Culture, „working paper” nr 20110926, s. 1–3. Dokument internetowy: http://www.freepaperdownload.us/1771/Article2297524.htm [dostęp: 1.07.2016].
  • Freeman, Ch., Young, A., Fulle, J., 1963, The Plastic Industry: A Comparative Study of Research and Innovation, “National Institute Economic Review”, 26: 22–49.
  • Freeman, Ch., 1968, Chemical Process Plant: Innovation and the World Market, “National Institute Economy Review”, 45: 29–51.
  • Freeman, Ch., Ray, G.F., 1969, The Diffusion of New Technology: A Study of Ten Processes in Nine Industries, “National Institute Economic Review”, 48: 40–100.
  • Freeman, Ch., 1974, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, Harmondsworth: Penguin Books.
  • Freeman, Ch., 1982, The Economics of Industrial Innovation, London: Pinter.
  • Freeman, Ch., 1987, Technology Policy and Economic Performance: Lessons from Japan, London: Pinter.
  • Gilfillan, S.C., 1935, The Sociology of Invention, Cambridge: MIT Press.
  • Godin, B., 2002, The Rise of Innovation Surveys: Measuring a Fuzzy Concept, artykuł opracowany w ramach projektu The History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, “working paper” nr 6, document internetowy: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_16.pdf [dostęp: 10.11.2016].
  • Godin, B., 2005, The Linear Model of Innovation: the Historical Construction of an Analytical Framework, artykuł opracowany w ramach projektu The History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, “working paper” nr 30, Dokument internetowy: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/Godin_30.pdf [dostęp: 10.11.2016].
  • Godin, B., 2008, In the Shadow of Schumpeter: W. Rupert Maclaurin and the Study of Technological Innovation, “Minerva” 46.3: 343–360.
  • Godin, B., 2010, Innovation Studies: The Invention of a Specialty, Part II, artykuł opracowany w ramach projektu The History and Sociology of S&T Statistics, “working paper” nr 8, document internetowy: http://www.csiic.ca/PDF/IntellectualNo8.pdf [dostęp: 14.11.2016].
  • Godin, B., 2015, Innovation Contested. The Idea of Innovation Over Centuries, New York: Routledge.
  • Gruber, H., 1982, On the Hypothesized Relation between Giftedness and Creativity, w: D. Feldman, red., New Directions for Child Development: Developmental Approaches to Giftedness and Creativity, San Fransisco: CA: Jossey-Bass.
  • Hodghson, G.M., 1993, Joseph Schumpeter and the Evolutionary Process, w: G.M. Hodgson, red., Economisc and Evolution, Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 139–151.
  • Kozyr-Kowalski, S., 2005, Uniwersytet a rynek, Poznań: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Adama Mickiewicza w Poznaniu.
  • Maclaurin, W.R., 1946, Investing in Science for the Future, „Technology Review” 48.7: 423–454.
  • Maclaurin, W.R., Harman, R.J., 1949, Invention and Innovation in the Radio Industry, Nowy Jork: MacMillan.
  • Maclaurin, W.R., 1950, The Process of Technological Innovation: the Launching of a New Scientific Industry, “American Economic Review”, 40: 90–112.
  • Maclaurin, W.R., 1953, The Sequence from Invention to Innovation and its Relation to Economic Growth, “The Quarterly Journal of Economics”, 67: 97–111.
  • Macleod, C., 2008, Want not Watt: Analyzing Invention from the Peripheries of Nineteenth-Century British Economics, “Business Archive”, 97: 39–54.
  • Miettinen, R., 2002, National Innovation System – Scientific Concept or Political Rhetoric, Helsinki: Edita.
  • Miettinen, R., 2012, Innovation, Human Capabilities, and Democracy. Towards an Enabling Welfare State, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Myers, S., Marquis, D.G., 1969, Successful Industrial Innovation: a Study of Factors Underlying Innovation in Selected Firms, Washington: National Science Fund.
  • NBER, 1962, The Rate and Direction of Inventive Activity: Economic and Social Factors, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Nelson, R., 1993, National Innovation Systems. A Comparative Analysis, New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Nelson, R., Winter, S.G., 1977, In Search of a Useful Theory of Innovation, “Research Policy”, 6: 36–76.
  • OECD, 1962, Proposed Standard Practice for Surveys of Research and Development, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD, 1968, Gaps in Technology, Paris: OECD.
  • OECD, 1980, Technical Change and Economic Policy, Paris: OECD.
  • Ogburn, W.F., 1937, The Infl uence of Inventions on American Social Institutions in the Future, “American Journal of Sociology”, 3: 365–376.
  • Rogers, E.M., 1962, The Diffusion of Innovation, New York: Free Press.
  • Rosenberg, N., 1976, Problems in the Economist’s Conceptualization of Technological Innovation, w: N. Rosenberg, red., Perspectives on Technology, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 61–84.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1928, The Instability of Capitalism, “The Economic Journal”, 38: 361–386.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1939, Business Cycles: A Theoretical Historical and Statistical Analysis of the Capitalist Process, t. 1, New York: McGraw Hill.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1942, Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy, New Yok: Harper.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1947, The Creative Response in Economic History, “Journal of Economic History”, VII: 149–159.
  • Schumpeter, J., 1960, Teoria rozwoju gospodarczego, Warszawa: PWN.
  • Sharif, N., 2006, Emergence and Development of the National Innovation Systems Concept, “Research Policy”, 35: 745–766.
  • Skinner, Q., 2002, Visions of Politics, t. 1, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Smith, G.E. i in., 1927, Culture: the Diffusion Controversy, New York: Norton and Co.
  • SPRU, 1972, Success and Failure in Industrial Innovation. A Summary of Project SAPHO, London: Centre for the Study of Industrial Innovation.
  • SPRU, 2016, About SPRU, Dokument internetowy: http://www.sussex/ac.uk/spru [dostęp: 12.07.2016].
  • Star, L.S., Griesemer, J.L, 1989, Institutional Ecology, ‘Translations’ and Boundary Objects: Amateurs and Professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907–39, “Social Studies of Science”, 19: 387–420.
  • UK CAC, 1968, Technological Innovation in Britain, UK Central Advisory Council on Science and Technology London: HSMO.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e1b64fc4-eb3e-4a72-b515-1c61cbaea210
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.