Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2015 | 19 | 178-191

Article title

Leszek Przyjemski - "Polski sytuacjonista"

Authors

Content

Title variants

EN
Leszek Przyjemski – ‘Polish situationist’

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
I analyze detournament in the work by Leszek (Leonard) Przyjemski – one of the basic strategy by situa-tionists. Przyjemski graduated from the Academy of Fine Arts in Gdansk in 1968 – in the year of the student revolt in Paris, where the Situationists celebrated their strategies as the biggest triumph. There is no hard evidence (the artist does not provide any) that he was directly inspired by those events. The analysis is therefore based on the similarity of the results. This revolt was directed against authority and oppression in both the capitalist and communist systems. The situational strategy was used by many artists, including for example Przemysław Kwiek, Marek Konieczny, Pawel Freisler, and Anastasius Wisniewski who cooperated with Przyjemski at the beginning of their careers. It was Przyjemski, though, who considered the situationist strategy as the basis of his artistic method which he used throughout his career. Situationist strategy includes the reversal of the vector of meanings. Detournament reveals itself also (but not only) through the use of comedy – through incompatibility of ideas and reality, most often through the reduction ad absurdum. In his artwork, humor is associated with reflec-tion. I describe the most important artwork by Przyjemski, and I analyze it in the context of detournament strategy. I also describe the significant shift in Przyjemski’s detournament in connection with the activities by other Situationists. The most important difference is the lack of set goals – social, general – in Przyjemski’s artwork (other Polish artists followed the same idea). It was their response to the situation in which they found themselves in Poland.

Year

Volume

19

Pages

178-191

Physical description

Dates

published
2015

Contributors

author

References

  • Jerzy Bereś, Jestem za otwarciem dialogu, rozmowę przeprowadził W. Bosak, Ł. Guzek, „Tumult”, nr 6 (1989), s. 41–47.
  • Tomasz Gryglewicz, Groteska w sztuce polskiej XX wieku, Wydawnictwo Literackie, Kraków 1984, s. 130.
  • Jarosław Denisiuk, Mogłoby zacząć się gdziekolwiek… , [w:] Elbląg konceptualny, red. Jarosław Denisiuk, Centrum Sztuki Galeria El, Elbląg 2010, s. 26–27.
  • Ryszard Tomczyk, Elbląskie laboratorium sztuki w latach 1969–1971, [w:] Elbląg konceptualny, dz. cyt., s. 68.
  • Ryszard Tomczyk, Elbląskie laboratorium sztuki w latach 1969–1971, dz. cyt, s. 79.
  • Leszek Przyjemski, Museum of Histerics 1968–2012, Galeria Miejska Arsenał, Poznań b.d.w., s. 14–15.
  • Leszek Przyjemski, Museum of Hysterics 1968–2012 dz. cyt., s. 32–35. KwieKulik. Zofia Kulik & Przemysław Kwiek, red. Łukasz Ronduda, Georg Schöllhammer, kat. wyst., Muzeum Sztuki Nowoczesnej, Warszawa 2012, s. 190.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-e3a3c1d9-44f8-4e6b-89ef-3e020f7694fc
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.