Explaining China’s Behavior in Keystone International Financial Institutions: Learning, Adaptation and Reshaping?

• Authors: Xiaochen Hou
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Over the last three decades, China’s participation in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the World Bank) and the IMF has gone through three stages of: initial participation; steady development; and partnership . Over this time China has definitely became more engaged in the international financial institutions; become a great player in international affairs, and changed its role from recipient to contributor; from receiving technical assistance to sharing experience; from borrowing loans to being co-lender;. Why China has changed its attitude and behavior towards the World Bank and the IMF and will China effectively influence reconstruction of the international financial system? This paper explores to answer these questions from the perspective of three international relations theories of: structural realism, neoliberal institutionalism, and constructivism. There will be three hypotheses tested in the process, which cover the whole process of China’s engagement in theinternational financial institution over more than 30 years. Thre will be two case studies conduceted to this end, the first of which regards China’s protest against the 2007 IMF surveillance. The second case is about votingpower reform of the IMF and the World Bank, which attracted attention around the globe. The overview of China’s engagement in the two organizations and the two cases shall fully test the three hypotheses. This paper argues that in the initial period, neoliberal institutionalism can better explain the interaction between China and the World Bank, and the IMF. In the last century, China’s proactive behavior can be better explained from structural realist and constructivist positions, focusing on China’s rising economic power, and redefined identity and interest. Nonetheless China will remain within the system, and will not attempt to to overthrow it. In the meantime, China will probably contribute to constructing other institutions to push for the reform of international financial institutions more effectively.

Keywords

EN

China, international financial institutions, reform, voting power, decision-making

• Publisher: Fundacja Instytut Nauki o Polityce
• Journal: Polish Journal of Political Science
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 1
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 23-51

Dates

published

2015-06-15

Contributors

author

Xiaochen Hou

• University of Macau

References

• 1. Bottelier, Pieter. “China and the World Bank: How A Partnership Was Built”. Journal of Contemporary China 16 (2007): 239–258. 2. Chan, Gerald, Pak K. Lee and Lai-Ha Chan. China Engages Global Governance. New York: Routledge, 2012. 3. Chin, Gregory. “Two-Way Socialization: China, the Work Bank and Hegemonic Weakening.” The Brown Journal of World Affairs 19 (2012): 211-230. 4. Dunne, Tim, Milja Kurki and SteveSimth. International Relations Theories: Discipline and Diversity. New York: Oxford University Press, 2007. 5. Frieden, Jeffry A., David A. Lake and Kenneth A. Schultz. World Politics: Interests, Interactions, Institutions. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc, 2010. 6. Heep, Sandra. China in Global Finance: Domestic Financial Repression and International Financial Power. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing, 2014. 7. Horner, Charles. Rising China and Its Postmodern Fate. Athens: University of Georgia Press, 2009. 8. IMF, “Quota and voting shares before and after implementation of reforms agreed in 2008 and 2010”. Accessed 15 May 2014. http://www.imf.org/external/np/sec/pr/2011/pdfs/quota_tbl.pdf. 9. IMF, Statement by Zhou Xiaochuan at the 27th Meeting of the IMFC in 2013. Accessed 10 May 2014. http://www.imf.org/External/spring/2013/imfc/statement/eng/chn.pdf. 10. IMF, Statement by Yi Gang at the 29th Meeting of the IMFC in 2014. Accessed 10 May 2014. http://www.imf.org/External/spring/2014/imfc/statement/eng/chn.pdf. 11. Jacobson, Harold K. and Michel Oksenberg. China’s Participation in the IMF, the World Bank, and GATT: Toward a Global Economic Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 1990. 12. Johnston, Alastair Iain, and Robert S. Ross. Engaging China: the Management of An Emerging Power. London: Routledge, 1999. 13. Johnston, Alastair. Iain. “Meiguo XueZhe Guanyu Zhongguo yu Guojizuzhi Guanxi Yanjiugaishu” (A General Review on American Scholars’ Study on the Relationship between China and International Organizations). Shijie Jijing yu Zhengzhi(World Economics and Politics) 8(2001):48-50. 14. Kegley, Charles W., JR. World Politics, Trend and Transformation. CA: Wadsworth / Cengage Learning, 2009. 15. Keohane, Robert O. International Institutions and State Power. US: Westview Press􀋈 1989. 16. Keohane, Robert. After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the World Political Economy. Princeton. N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1985. 17. Kim, Samuel. China and the World: Chinese Foreign Policy Faces the New Millennium. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998. 18. Lardy, Nicholas. China in the World Economy. Washington, DC: Institute for International Economics, 1994. 19. Martin, Lisa, and Beth Simmons. “Theories and Empirical Studies of International Institutions.” International Organization 52 (1998): 729- 757. 20. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of PRC, Policy Planning Department. China’s Foreign Affairs. Beijing: World Knowledge Press, 2003-2013. 21. Ni, Shixiong. Contemporary Western International Relations Theory. Shanghai: press of university of FUDAN, 2001. 22. Onuf, Nicholas. World of Our Making: Rules and Rule in Social Theory and International Relations. Columbia SC: University of South Carolina Press, 1989. 23. Pearson, Margaret M. “The Major Multilateral Economic Institutions Engage China.” In Engaging China: The Management of a Rising Power, edited by Alastair Iain Johnston and Robert S. Ross, 207-34. London: Routledge Press, 1999. 24. Pu, Xiaoyu. “China and International Order Revisited: A Political Sociology Perspective.” World Economics and Politics 1(2010): 23-36. 25. Qu, Bo. “Dynamic Engagement: China’s Preference to the international Monetary Cooperation”. University of Princeton, 2010. 26. Russett, Bruce, and Harvey Starr, David Kinsella. World Politics: the Menu For Choice. MA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2010. 27. Sutter, Robert G. Chinese Foreign Relations: Powers and Policy Since the Cold War. US: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 2008. 28. Shi, Jianxun. “What is meant by re-apportioning China’s IMF voting rights to 3rd”. People’s Daily Online. Accessed May 20, 2014. http://english.peopledaily.com.cn/90001/90780/91421/717000.html 29. Song, Wei. “The Recent Reform of IMF Decision-making Structure and its Influence on China from 2006 to 2012.” International Economics and Trade Research, 29 (2013): 94-106. 30. Waltz, Kenneth. Theory of International Politics, translated by Xin Qiang, Shanghai: Shanghai People’s Publishing House, 2008. 31. Wendt, Alexander. “Anarchy is What States Make of It: The Social Construction of Power Politics”. International Organization 2(1992): 46- 50. 32. Xin, Zhiming. “China gains more say in World Bank.” China Daily. Accessed May 20, 2014. 33. http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/business/2010-04/27/content_9778666.htm. 34. George Wei, and Lowell Dittmer, 10-19. Lexington, Ky.: University of Kentucky, 2009. 35. Zhao, Suisheng. Chinese Foreign Policy: Pragmatism and Strategic Behavior. US: M.E. Sharpe Charles Horner, 2004. 36. Zheng, Yongnian. Da Guo Ze Ren. Beijing: Ba Fang Wen Hua Chuang Zuo Shi, 2004.