Neoawangarda; wprowadzenie do sztuki współczesnej

• Authors: Dziamski Grzegorz

Title variants

EN

Neo-Avant-Guard Art as an Introduction to Postmodern Art

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

Grzegorz Dziamski analyzes two concepts of neo-avant-guard theoreticians: by Frank Popper and Jerzy Ludwiński. They both shared a belief in avantguard’s theology. They believed that avant-guard had a goal: it aimed, more or less consciously, to some purpose or—to put it slightly differently—that it was subordinated to some historic logic which we can identify and describe. They tried to reveal logic in the changes of the neoavant- guard and they assumed that there was a meta-narrative in the conversion of neo-avant-guard which would explain the changes. When neo-avant-guard achieved its goal, its history came to an end and thus it lost its explanatory metanarrative. Here we encounter a wellknown figure by Hegel: neo-avant-guard art contributed to the formation of the goal in art thus art became self-aware. Ludwiński said that ‘art knows that anything can be art’, therefore it can use different forms, styles, languages, media and it does not have to make every effort to distinguish itself from non- art. There is one common feature of the two avant-guard theories: both theories are formed ex post, from the out-side point of view, assumed when the process came to its end. Popper and Ludwiński’s theories can be cosidered as post-modern theories because they both analyzed avantgaurd from external position and they formed the distance to the avantguard and its narrativ. Also, they belive that all neo-avant-guard categories of description and criteria of evaluation of art have lost their meaning.

• Publisher: Akademia Sztuk Pięknych im. Eugeniusza Gepperta we Wrocławiu
• Journal: DYSKURS: Pismo Naukowo-Artystyczne ASP we Wrocławiu
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 17
• Pages: 28-47

Dates

published

2014

Contributors

author

Dziamski Grzegorz

References

• F. Popper, Art – Action and Participation, London 1975, s. 281.
• J. Cage, On Robert Rauschenberg, Artist and His Work, [w:] Silence, Middletown 1961, s. 105.
• W. Welsch, Stając się sobą, [w:] Problemy ponowoczesnej pluralizacji kultury. Wokół koncepcji Wolfganga Welscha. Część I (red. A. Zeidler- Janiszewska), Poznań 1998.
• S. Home, Gwałt na kulturze (przekł. E. Mikina), Warszawa 1993, s. 68.
• J. Baudrillard, Kool Killer, or the Insurection of Signs, [w:] Symbolic Exchange and Death, London 1993.
• D. Davis, Art and the Future, New York 1973, s. 76.
• W. Grasskamp, Art in the City. An Italian- German Tale, [w:] Public Art. A Reader (ed. F. Matzner), Ostfildern-Ruit 2004.
• B. Kowalska, Polska awangarda malarska 1945–1970, Warszawa 1975, s. 132.
• J. Ludwiński, Sztuka po, [w:] Pokaz poznański ‘85, Galeria Studio, Warszawa 1985. Art AFTER, [w:] Notes from the Future of Art, dz. cyt.
• E. Lucie-Smith, Movements in Art Since 1945, London 1969, s. 11.
• B. Groys, The Artist as an Exemplary Art Consumer, [w:] XIV International Congress of Aesthetics, Ljubljana 1998, „Filozofski Vestnik”, 1999, no 2, s. 89.
• J. Ludwiński, Strefa ciszy (1998), [w:] Sztuka w epoce postartystycznej i inne teksty (red. J. Kozłowski), Poznań – Wrocław 2010, s. 209.
• J. Baudrillard, Cool Memories, London 1990, s. 203.
• J. Baudrillard, After the Orgy, [w:] The Transparency of Evil. Essays on Extreme Phenomena, London – New York 1993, s. 8.
• B. Malinowski, A Scientific Theory of Culture (1944). Cyt. Za: Naukowa teoria kultury, [w:] Kultura i jej przemiany (przekł. A. Bydłoń, A. Mach), Warszawa 2000, s. 95.
• Z. Bauman, Płynna nowoczesność, Kraków 2006; Z. Bauman, Płynne czasy; życie w epoce niepewności, Warszawa 2007. Zob. również A. Kępińska, Sztuka w kulturze płynności, Poznań 2003.