Zasada „3 P” — o czym milczą rodziny w powieści pozytywizmu?

• Authors: Budrewicz Tadeusz

Title variants

EN

A “3 P” Principle: What Is Silenced by Families in the Novel of Positivism?

• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

The article raises the problem of avoiding certain topics in family conversations, which images were written by Polish novel of the second half of the 19th century. Documentary materials were taken from the works of the following authors: Stanisław Grudziński, Natalia Korwin–Szymanowska, Waleria Marrené–Morzkowska, Eliza Orzeszkowa, Bolesław Prus, and Henryk Sienkiewicz. Among there are very acknowledged authors as well as the secondary and forgotten. Due to such selection of sources, the phenomenon described in the article can be considered as an objective state of affairs. The nineteenth century novel was subjected to rigours of censorship, forcing authors to cipher (Aesop’s speech). The author proves that more important in the regulation of the topics of conversation was a moral taboo, which excluded speaking on some of them. The article justifies a thesis that it hindered dialogues within the family circle. This concerned mainly three areas: politics, money, and sexes (3 P in Polish). These areas of social life were dependent on legal regulations, which treated preferentially men. The absence of these topics in the conversations proves that the marriage did not have the democratic status of a partnership.

Keywords

PL

powieść drugiej połowy XIX wieku; Pozytywizm; rodzina; przemilczenie

EN

novel of second half of the 19th century; positivism; family; concealment

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski / Instytut Badań Literackich PAN
• Journal: Napis. Pismo poświęcone literaturze okolicznościowej i użytkowej
• Year: 2012
• Issue: 18
• Pages: 121-137

Contributors

author

Budrewicz Tadeusz

• Uniwersytet Pedagogiczny im. KEN