Menschliche Sprachfähigkeit und ihre neurobiologischen Korrelate. Reflexionen aus glottodidaktischer Sicht

• Authors: Sadownik Barbara

Title variants

EN

A glottodidactic perspective on human language faculty and its neurobiological correlates

• Languages of publication: DE

Abstracts

EN

The focus in the present contribution is on glottodidactics researchers’ attempts at working out a coherent model of foreign language acquisition in its both cognitive and neurobiological aspects. It is argued that the latest developments in cognitive linguistics as well as in psycholinguistics do offer an elaborate account of the nature and the structure of human language capacity, and, as such, they can constitute a source of inspiration for glottodidactics research. By contrast, despite significant achievements over the last decades, our knowledge of the language-mind interface is still elementary, speculative, and does not prove to be significantly relevant for glottodidactics.

Keywords

EN

Glottodidactics; Foreign Language Acquisition Theory; Human Language Faculty Universal Grammar; Cognitive Neurosciences Neuroimaging

• Publisher: Instytut Komunikacji Specjalistycznej i Interkulturowej
• Journal: Applied Linguistics Papers
• Year: 2019
• Issue: 26/1
• Pages: 155-168

Dates

published

2019-03-25

Contributors

author

Sadownik Barbara

• Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie

References

• Aarts, B. (2001), Corpus linguistics, Chomsky and fuzzy tree fragments. In: Ch. Mair/ M. Hundt (Hrsg.), Corpus linguistics and linguistic theory. Amsterdam, 5–13.
• Bennett, M./ P. Hacker/ J.R. Searle/ D. Dennett (2010), Neurowissenschaft und Philosophie: Gehirn, Geist und Sprache. Frankfurt/ M.
• Berwick, R.C./ N. Chomsky (2011), The Biolinguistic Program: The Current State of its Development. In: A.M. Di Sciullo/ C. Boeckx (Hrsg.), Biolinguistic Investigations. Oxford, 19– 41.
• Berwick, R.C./ P. Pietroski/ B. Yankama/ N. Chomsky (2011), Poverty of the Stimulus Revisited. In: „Cognitive Science”, 35, 1207–1242.
• Berwick, R.C./ A.D. Friederici/ N. Chomsky/ J.J. Bolhuis (2013), Evolution, brain, and the nature of language. In: „Trends in Cognitive Science” 17, 89–98.
• Berwick, R.C./ N. Chomsky (2016), Why Only Us. Cambridge.
• Bolhuis, J.J./ I. Tattersall/ N. Chomsky/ R.C. Berwick (2014), How could language have evolved?. In: „PLOS Biology” 12 (8): e1001934.
• Bolhuis, J.J./ I. Tattersall/ N. Chomsky/ R.C. Berwick (2015), Language: UG or Not to Be, That Is the Question. In: „PLOS Biology”13 (2): e1002063.
• Chomsky, N. (1981), Lectures on Government and Binding. The Pisa Lectures. Dordrecht.
• Chomsky, N. (1982), The generative enterprise A discussion with Riny Huybregts and Henk van Riemsdijk. Dordrecht.
• Chomsky, N. (1984), Modular approaches to the study of the mind. San Diego.
• Chomsky, N. (1986), Knowledge of Language: its Nature, Origin and Use. New York.
• Chomsky, N. (1988), Language and Problems of Knowledge. The Managua Lectures. Cambridge, Mass.
• Chomsky, N. (1995), The Minimalist Program. MA/London, Cambridge Mass.
• Chomsky, N. (1996). Powers and Prospects. Reflections on Human Nature and the Social Order. London.
• Chomsky, N. (2000a), New Horizons in the Study of Language and Mind. Cambridge.
• Chomsky, N. (2000b), The Architecture of Language. Oxford.
• Chomsky, N. (2000c), Minimalist inquiries: The framework. In: R. Martin/ D. Michaels/ J. Uriagereka (Hrsg.) Step by step: Essays on minimalist syntax in honor of Howard Lasnik. Cambridge, 89–155.
• Chomsky, N. (2002), On Nature and Language. Cambridge.
• Chomsky, N. (2005), Three factors in language design. In: „Linguistic Inquiry”, 36 (1), 1–22.
• Chomsky, N. (2006), Approaching UG from below, (in: U. Sauerland/ H.-M. Gärtner, (Hrsg.), Interfaces + recursion = language? Chomsky’s minimalism and the view from syntax-semantics. Berlin/ New York. 1–29.
• Chomsky, N. (2011), Language and other cognitive systems: What is special about language?, (in): „Language Learning and Development”, 7(4), 263–278.
• Chomsky, N. (2013), Problems of projection. „Lingua” 130, 33–49.
• Chomsky, N. (2016), Was für Lebewesen sind wir?, Berlin.
• Conrad S. (2010), What can a corpus tell us about grammar?. In: A. O’Keeffe/ M. McCarthy (Hrsg.), The Routledge handbook of corpus linguistics (Routledge Handbooks in Applied Linguistics). London/New York. 227–240.
• De Groot, A.M.B./ P. Hagoort (2018), Research methods in psycholinguistics and the neurobiology of language: A practical guide. Oxford.
• Evans, N./ S.C. Levinson (2009), The myth of language universals: Language diversity and its importance for cognitive science, „Behavioural and Brain Sciences” 32, 429–492.
• Fitch, T.W./ M.D. Hauser/ N. Chomsky (2005), The evolution of the language faculty: Clarifications and implications. In: „Cognition” 97, 179–210.
• Friederici A.D. (2011), The brain basis of language processing: From structure to function. In: „Physiological Reviews” 91, 1357–1392.
• Friederici A.D. (2012), The cortical language circuit: From auditory perception to sentence comprehension. In: „Trends in Cognitive Sciences” 16, 262–268.
• Friederici A. (2018), Language in Our Brain. The Origins of a Uniquely Human Capacity. Vorwort von Noam Chomsky. Cambridge.
• Friederici A.D./ R.C. Berwick/ N. Chomsky/ J.J. Bolhuis (2013), Evolution, brain and the nature of lang,uage. In: „Trends in Cognitive Sciences”17, 89–98.
• Friederici A.D./ S.M. Gierhan,(2013), The language network. In: „Current Opinion in Neurobiology” 23 (2), 250–254.
• Geschwind, N. (1970), The organization of language and the brain. In: „Science” 170, 940–944.
• Geschwind, N. (1972), Language and the brain, „Scientific Americian” 226, 76–83.
• Grewendorf, G. (1994), Interview with Noam Chomsky: Notes on linguistics and politics. In: „Linguistische Berichte” 153, 386 –392.
• Grucza, F. (2002), Zu den Forschungsgegenständen der Linguistik und der Glottodidaktik. Zum Wesen menschlicher Sprachen und zu ihren Funktionen. In: H. Barkowski/ R. Faistauer (Hrsg.), in Sachen Deutsch als Fremdsprache. Baltmannsweiler, 231–244.
• Grucza, F. (2006), Glottodydaktyka: nauka – praca naukowa – wiedza. In: „Glottodydaktyka”, 20,19–40.
• Grucza, F. (2010), Główne tezy antropocentrycznej teorii języków. In: „Lingwistyka Stosowana/Applied Linguistics/Angewandte Linguistik” 2. 41–68.
• Grucza, F./ H.J. Krumm/ B. Grucza (1993), Beiträge zur wissenschaftlichen Fundierung der Ausbildung von Fremdsprachenlehrern. Warszawa.
• Hacker, P. (2017), The Passions: A study of Human Nature. Oxford.
• Hagoort, P. (2017), The core and beyond in the language-ready brain . In: ”Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews” 81, 194–204.
• Haxler, F. (2013), Neuromythologie. Eine Streitschrift gegen die Deutungsmacht der Hirnforschung,3. Ausg., Bielefeld.
• Hüsing B./ L. Jäncke/ B. Tag (2006), Impact Assessment of Neuroimaging. Zürich.
• Jäncke, L. (2005), Methoden der Bildgebung in der Psychologie und den kognitiven Neurowissenschaften. Stuttgart.
• Kara, S. Universalgrammatik: "Ich denke, dass er denkt, dass ...". In: ZEIT ONLINE. https://www.zeit.de/2018/18 [abgerufen am 2. Mai 2018]
• Konopka, M. (2018), Korpuslingustik, Grammatiktheorie, GrammatikographieI. In: A. Wöllstein/ P. Gallmann/ M. Habermann /M. Krifka (Hrsg.) Grammatiktheorie und Empirie in der germanistischen Linguistik. Berlin, 151–185.
• Langacker, R. (1987), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Theoretical prerequisites. Bd. 1 Stanford.
• Langacker, R. (1991), Foundations of Cognitive Grammar. Bd 2. Stanford.
• Meisel J./ Ch. Schwarz (2002), Romanistische und theoretische Linguistik. Das Besondere und das Allgemeine. In: „Romanische Forschungen” 114, 423–444.
• Müller, H. M. (2013), Psycholinguistik - Neurolinguistik. München.
• Müller S. (2016), Grammatical theory: From transformational grammar to constraintbased approaches. Berlin.
• Sadownik, B. (1997), Glottodidiaktische und psycholinguistische Aspekte des Fremdsprachenerwerbs Lernerperspektive. Lublin.
• Sadownik, B. (2010), Modulare Architektur der menschlichen Sprachfähigkeit – kognitive und neurobiologische Dimensionen, Lublin.
• Sadownik, B. (2012), Möglichkeiten und Grenzen des Einsatzes bildgebender Verfahren bei der Erforschung neurobiologischer Grundlagen der Sprache. Eine Spezifizierung aus glottodidaktischer Perspektive. In: M. Olpińska-Szkiełko/ S. Grucza/ Z. Berdychowska/ J. Żmudzki (Hrsg.), Der Mensch und seine Sprachen. Frankfurt a.M., 500–514.
• Schuerman, W.L., et al., (2017), Mapping the speech code: Cortical responses linking the perception and production of vowels, „Frontiers in Human Neuroscience” 11, 161–183.
• Tomasello, M. (2003), Constructing a Language: A Usage-Based Theory of Language Acquisition. Cambridge.
• Tomasello, M. (2004), What kind of evidence could refute the UG hypothesis?. In: „Studies in Language” 28, 642–644.
• Tomasello, M. (2006), Die kulturelle Entwicklung des menschlichen Denkens. Zur Evolution der Kognition. Frankfurt a. M.
• Tomasello, M. (2009), Universal Grammar is dead. In: „Behavioral and Brain Sciences” 32(5), 470–471.
• Tomasello, M. (2011), Ursprünge der menschlichen Kommunikation. Frankfurt.
• Tomasello, M. (2014), Eine Naturgeschichte des menschlichen Denkens. Berlin.
• Trettenbrein, P.C., (2015), The “grammar” in Universal Grammar: A biolinguistic clarification „Questions and Answers in Linguistics” 2 (1), 1–10.

Identifiers

ISSN

2544-9354