The Defense of Monopoly as a Determinant of the Process of Transformation of State-owned Infrastructure Sectors in Poland

• Authors: Krystyna Bobińska
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper aims to prove that during the transformation process in Poland of the sectors of general economic interests due to specific economic characteristics of those sectors and the fact that interests of three groups participating in the decision making in this process: government, management and employees turned out being non controversial prevented loosing the monopoly status they initially enjoyed. The method used was the analysis of the stages of negotiation illustrated by subsequent documents of official strategies chosen for three sectors: railway, electricity and the final result illustrated by the structure of the market. Preventing the monopoly status permitted those groups seeking the rent, the monopoly status created or even demand that rent in the form of subsidy from the public authorities budgets by the threat of the strike which is the grave threat in the sectors delivering the service of general economic interest.

Keywords

EN

infrastructure; public capital; public service; obligations

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Warszawski. Wydawnictwo Naukowe Wydziału Zarządzania
• Journal: Yearbook of Antitrust and Regulatory Studies
• Year: 2008
• Volume: 1(1)
• Pages: 131-150

Dates

published

2008-12-01

Contributors

author

Krystyna Bobińska

• Institute of Economic Science, Polish Academy of Sciences

References

• Bobińska K., “Ekonomiczna racjonalność finansowania usług użyteczności publicznej” [“Economic rationlisation of financing services of general interests”] (2005) 4 Studia Ekonomiczne.
• Bobińska K., Prywatyzacja infrastruktury [Privatisation of instrastructure] Zeszyty TEP, No. 9, May 2005.
• Gadowska K., Zjawisko klientelizmu polityczno – ekonomicznego [Phenomenon of economicpolitical clientelism], Kraków 2002.
• Gadawski J., Gilejko L., Siewierski J., Towalski R., Socjologia gospodarki [Sociology of economy],Warszawa 2005.
• Giddens A., Socjologia [Sociology], Poznań 1998.
• Jasiński P., Skoczny T. (eds.), Elektroenergetyka [Energy industry], Warszawa 1996.
• Krueger A.O., “The political economy of the rent-seeking” (1974) 91 American Economic Review.
• Kruger A.O., “Government Failures in Development” (1990) 3 Journal of Economic Perspectives.
• Mączyńska E., Restrukturyzacja przedsiębiorstw w procesie transformacji gospodarki polskiej [Restructurisation of enterprises in a process of transformation of Polish economy] Vol. I,Warszawa 2001.
• Niskanen W.A., Bureaucracy and Representative Government, Chicago 1971.
• Raczyński M. (and others), W pogoni za rentą [Chasing for a rent], Warszawa 1998.
• Straume O. R., “Rent-seeking in a unionized monopoly” (2002) 3 Economics of Governance 2002.
• Rowley Ch. The Political Economy of Rent-Seeking, London 1989.
• Szablewski A., Mechanizmy rynkowe w energetyce i telekomunikacji [Market mechanisms in energy industry and telecommunications] Monografie, No. 8, INE PAN, Warszawa 1996.
• Tullock G., “The welfare costs of tariffs, monopolies, and theft” (1967) 5 Western Economic Journal.