Epistemic Erotetic Search Scenarios

• Authors: Łupkowski Paweł , Majer Ondrej , Peliš Michal , Urbański Mariusz
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The aim of this paper is to introduce erotetic search scenarios known from Inferential Erotetic Logic by using the framework of epistemic erotetic logic. The key notions used in this system are those of askability and epistemic erotetic implication. Scenarios are supposed to represent all rational strategies of an agent solving the problem posed by the initial question where the interaction with an external information source is seen as a series of updates of the agent’s knowledge.

Keywords

EN

questions; Inferential Erotetic Logic (IEL); Dynamic Epistemic Logic (DEL); e-scenarios; agenda

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika (Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń)
• Journal: Logic and Logical Philosophy
• Year: 2018
• Volume: 27
• Issue: 3
• Pages: 301-328

Dates

published

2018-09-15

Contributors

author

Łupkowski Paweł

• Department of Logic and Cognitive Science Institute of Psychology Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań, Poland

author

Majer Ondrej

• Institute of Philosophy Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic Praha, Czech Republic

author

Peliš Michal

• Faculty of Arts Charles University Praha, Czech Republic

author

Urbański Mariusz

• Department of Logic and Cognitive Science Institute of Psychology Adam Mickiewicz University Poznań, Poland

References

• Genot, E.J., “Extensive questions”, pages 131–145 in R. Ramanujam and S. Sarukkai (eds.), Logic and Its Applications, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 5378, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2009. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-92701-3_9
• Ginzburg, J., The Interactive Stance: Meaning for Conversation, Oxford University Press Oxford, 2012. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199697922.001.0001
• Groenendijk, J., and M. Stokhof, “Questions”, pages 1055–1125 in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.), Handbook of Logic and Language, Elsevier, 1997. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/B978-044481714-3/50024-2
• Groenendijk, J., and F. Roelofsen, “Compliance”, pages 161–173 in A. Lecomte and S. Tronçon, editors, Ludics, Dialogue and Interaction, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6505, Springer, Berlinm Heidelberg, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-19211-1_10
• Leszczyńska-Jasion, D., and P. Łupkowski, “Erotetic search scenarios and three-valued logic”, Journal of Logic, Language and Information 25, 1 (2016): 51–76. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10849-015-9233-4
• Łupkowski, P., Test Turinga. Perspektywa sędziego, “Umysł. Prace z filozofii i kognitywistyki”, Wydawnictwo Naukowe UAM, Poznań, 2010.
• Łupkowski, P., “A formal approach to exploring the interrogator’sperspective in the Turing test”, Logic and Logical Philosophy, 20, 1/2 (2011):139–158. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2011.007
• Łupkowski, P., Logic of Questions in the Wild. Inferential Erotetic Logic in Information Seeking Dialogue Modelling, College Publications, London, 2016.
• Łupkowski, P., and D. Leszczyńska-Jasion, “Generating cooperative question-responses by means of erotetic search scenarios”, Logic and Logical Philosophy 24, 1 (2015): 61–78. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/LLP.2014.017
• Łupkowski, P., and A. Wiśniewski, “Turing interrogative games”, Minds and Machines 21, 3 (2011): 435–448. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11023-011-9245-z
• Olsson, E.J., and D. Westlund, “On the role of the research agenda in epistemic change”, Erkenntnis, 65, 2 (2006): 165–183. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-006-9001-6
• Peliš, M., Inferences with Ignorance: Logics of Questions (Inferential Erotetic Logic & Erotetic Epistemic Logic), Karolinum, Praha, 2016.
• Peliš, M., and O. Majer, “Logic of questions and public announcements”, pages 145–157 in N. Bezhanishvili, S. Löbner, K. Schwabe and L. Spada (eds.), Logic, Language, and Computation, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 6618, Springer, 2011. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-22303-7
• Urbański, M., “Synthetic tableaux and erotetic search scenarios: Extension and extraction”, Logique et Analyse 173–174–175 (2001): 69–91.
• Urbański, M., and P. Łupkowski, “Erotetic search scenarios: Revealing interrogator’s hidden agenda”, pages 67–74 in P. Łupkowski and M. Purver (eds.), Aspects of Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue. SemDial 2010, 14th Workshop on the Semantics and Pragmatics of Dialogue, Polish Society for Cognitive Science, Poznań, 2010.
• Urbański, M., K. Paluszkiewicz and J. Urbańska, “Erotetic problem solving: From real data to formal models. An analysis of solutions to erotetic reasoning test task”, pages 33–46 in F. Paglieri, L. Bonetti and S. Felletti (eds.), The Psychology of Argument: Cognitive Approaches to Argumentation and Persuasion, College Publications, London, 2016.
• van Ditmarsch, H., W. van der Hoek and B. Kooi, Dynamic Epistemic Logic, Springer, 2008. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-5839-4
• Wiśniewski, A., The Posing of Questions: Logical Foundations of Erotetic Inferences, Kluwer AP, Dordrecht, Boston, London, 1995.
• Wiśniewski, A., “Questions and inferences”, Logique et Analyse, 173–175 (2001): 5–43.
• Wiśniewski, A., “Erotetic search scenarios”, Synthese 134, 3 (2003): 389–427. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1022983325118
• Wiśniewski, A., Essays in Logical Philosophy, LIT Verlag, Berlin, Münster, Wien, Zürich, London, 2013.
• Wiśniewski, A., Questions, Inferences and Scenarios, volume 46 of Studies in Logic. Logic and Cognitive Systems, College Publications, 2013.
• Wiśniewski, A., “Answering by means of questions in view of Inferential Erotetic Logic”, pages 261–283 in J. Meheus, E. Weber and D. Wouters (eds.), Logic, Reasoning and Rationality, Springer, 2014. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9011-6_14