The Constitutional Limits on the Federal Government according to the Constitution’s Framers

• Authors: Mazurak Zbigniew
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The U.S. Constitution, as understood by the men who wrote it – the Framers – authorized only a limited form of federal government: limited in what it is allowed to do. That power, in turn, can only legitimately come from the People, who created the Federal Government. The said government is merely their creature. The objects on which it may legislate and spend money are strictly limited by its text, most notably Article I of the Constitution and the Tenth Amendment. The so‑called Interstate Commerce, General Welfare, and Necessary and Proper clauses, sometimes invoked in the contemporary news media as giving the Federal Government broad powers, are actually limited in scope and do not give it any broad powers. This is clearly demonstrated by the writings of the men who wrote the Constitution – the Framers, chiefly James Madison and Alexander Hamilton. Their writings, particularly the Federalist Papers, explain what exact objects the Federal Government’s authority is limited to, and why the claims of those who interpret the Constitution as giving the central government sweeping powers are wrong. The Necessary and Proper clause only gives the Congress the power to execute powers already granted, and does not give it any new substantive authority. The General Welfare clause (part of Clause 1 of Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution) is a general statement immediately limited and qualified by Clauses 3‑16; and in the Framers’ times, “welfare” meant only exemption from any unusual calamity and enjoyment of the ordinary blessings of society. The Interstate Commerce Clause only authorizes Congress to prevent the states from inhibiting interstate commerce – the free transportation and sale of goods and services across state borders – with barriers such as interstate tolls. Thus, the Federal Government the Framers envisaged – and created with the Constitution – was one of strictly limited, enumerated powers. This article starts from the premise that the men who wrote the Constitution knew it best and are the most credible authority on its genuine meaning. This is confirmed further by the writings of constitutional law scholars and by rulings of the Supreme Court in the Marshall era – rulings which, to this day, greatly influence American jurisprudence, and whose authors looked to the Federalist Papers for the correct interpretation of the Constitution.

Keywords

EN

the U.S. Constitution; the Framers of the Constitution

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 6(32)
• Pages: 183-202

Contributors

author

Mazurak Zbigniew

• University of Silesia in Katowice

References

• Arthur J., Words That Bind. Judicial Review and the Grounds of Modern Constitutional Theory, Boulder 1995.
• ‘Board of Visitors Minutes, March 4th, 1825’, University of Virginia Library, at <http://xtf.lib.virginia.edu/xtf/view?docId=2006_04/uvaGenText/tei/bov_18250304.xml&query=true>.
• Chernow R., Alexander Hamilton, New York 2004.
• Farrand M. (ed.), The Records of the Federal Convention of 1787, Vol. 1‑2, New Haven 1911, The Online Library of Liberty, at <http://oll.libertyfund.org/?option=com_staticxt&staticfile-=show.php%3Ftitle=1786&chapter=96058&layout=html&Itemid=27>.
• Furtwangler A., The Authority of Publius. A Reading of the Federalist Papers, Ithaca 1984.
• Gibbons v. Ogden, 22 U.S. 1 (1824), Oyez, IIT Chicago‑Kent College of Law, at <http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792‑1850/1824/1824_0>.
• Healy G., Lynch T., The Power Surge. The Constitutional Record of George W. Bush, Washington 2006.
• Helvidius [ J. Madison], ‘Letters of Helvidius, No. II’ in The Letters of Pacificus and Helvidius (1845) with the Letters of Americanus, Delmar 1976.
• Lambert v. Yellowley, 272 U.S. 581 (1926).
• Lodge H.C. (ed.), The Federalist, a Commentary on the Constitution of the United States: Being a Collection of Essays Written in Support of the Constitution Agreed Upon September 17, 1787, by the Federal Convention, New York–London 1902.
• Martin v. Hunter’s Lessee, 14. U.S. 304 (1816), Oyez, IIT Chicago‑Kent College of Law, at<http://www.oyez.org/cases/1792‑1850/1816/1816_0#sort=ideology>.
• McCulloch v. Maryland, 17 U.S. 316 (1819), Cornell University School of Law, Legal Information Institute, at <http://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/17/316>.
• Morris R.B., The Forging of the Union (1781‑1789), New York 1987 (New American Nation Series).
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Duration in Office of the Executive’, The New York Packet, 18 March 1788, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/ fed71.htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Executive Department Further Considered’, Independent Journal, 15 March 1788, The Constitution Society, at <http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa 70.htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Judiciary Department’, Independent Journal, 14 June 1788, The Constitution Society, at <http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa78.htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Real Character of the Executive’, The New York Packet, 14 March 1788, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed69. htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Same Subject Continued (Concerning the General Powers of Taxation)’, The Daily Advertiser, 3 January 1788, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers. info/federalistpapers/fed33.htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Same Subject Continued (Other Present Defects of the Confederation)’, The New York Packet, 14 December 1787, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers. info/federalistpapers/fed22.htm>.
• Publius [A. Hamilton], ‘The Treaty‑Making Power of the Executive’, Independent Journal, 26 March 1788, The Constitution Society, at <http://www.constitution.org/fed/federa75. htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘The Alleged Danger From the Powers of the Union to the State Governments Considered’, The Independent Journal, date of original publication unknown, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed45.htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘The Conformity of the Plan to Republican Principles’, The Independent Journal, date of original publication unknown, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed39.htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘General View of the Powers Conferred by The Constitution’, The Independent Journal, date of original publication unknown, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed41.htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘Objections to the Proposed Constitution From Extent of Territory Answered’, The New York Packet, 30 November 1787, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed14.htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘The Powers Conferred by the Constitution Further Considered’, The New York Packet, 22 January 1788, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed42.htm>.
• Publius [ J. Madison], ‘Restrictions on the Authority of the Several States’, The New York Packet, 25 January 1788, Founding Fathers, at <http://www.foundingfathers.info/federalistpapers/fed44.htm>.
• Stewart D., The Summer of 1787. The Men Who Invented the Constitution, New York 2008.
• Story J., Commentaries on the Constitution of the United States. With a Preliminary Review of the Constitutional History of the Colonies and States, Before the Adoption of the Constitution, Boston 1833 (19th‑Century Legal Treatises).
• Watkins W.J., Reclaiming the American Revolution. The Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions and their Legacy, New York 2004.
• Wills G., Explaining America. The Federalist, Garden City 1981.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.11.2014.32.11