From black hole to the pearl of the Mediterranean: a new idea of nation for independent Montenegro

• Authors: Violante Antonio
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

After the separation from Serbia following a referendum in 2006, the Republic of Montenegro started rebuilding its international image by reinventing its past and present. In fact, through an extensive campaign in both foreign and domestic media, the government attempted to change the perception of Montenegro’s history, focusing especially on the difference between Serbs and Montenegrins. This is understandable considering the minimal numeric superiority of those in favour of the independence, where the national factor was the main determinant. The image of the new Montenegrins, also in light of Montenegro’s route to joining the EU, must be detached from Serbia’s problems (– such as Kosovo) and must divert attention from the ever‑growing problem of international criminal traffic. One of the most emblematic examples of such recreation of virtue are the commercials for Montenegrin tourism, inviting to explore ancient forests, enjoy traditional food and experience “Montenegrin hospitality”: the aim is to send a positive message of non‑nationalistic, Europe‑friendly ethnicity. The purpose is also for Montenegro to be perceived as serene, as opposed to the ex‑partner country, seen largely as wildly nationalistic and ethnically obsessed: therefore, a new form of “soft” ethno‑cultural image has been introduced, incorporating only the best and cleverly minimizing the “non‑acceptable” aspects of its culture and history.

Keywords

EN

Nationalism; identity; nation; tourism; ethnicity

• Publisher: Księgarnia Akademicka
• Journal: Politeja : Pismo Wydziału Studiów Miedzynarodowych i Politycznych Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 1(31/2)
• Pages: 81-92

Contributors

author

Violante Antonio

• University of Milan

References

• Cattaruzza A., Territoire et nationalisme au Montenegro. Les voies de l’indépendance, Paris 2012 (Géographie et Cultures. Culture et Politique).
• ‘Country Profile (Montenegro)’, European Environment Agency, 26 November 2010, at .
• ‘Declaration concerning the ecological state of Montenegro’, ESE, at .
• Esman M.J., An Introduction to Ethnic Conflict, Cambridge 2004.
• Gilić J., Montenegro, corsa agli immobili, Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, 12 December 2006, at .
• Čolović I., The Politics of Symbol in Serbia. Essays on Political Anthropology, trans. by C. Hawkesworth, London 2002.
• Lješkovic Mitrović S., ECO Lodge koncept u Crnoj Gori. ECO Lodge concept in Montenegro, Podgorica 2007.
• Pavičić J., ‘Mediterraneo: camera senza vista’, Lettera Internazionale, Vol. 114 (2012).
• Perica V., Balkan Idols. Religion and Nationalism in Yugoslav States, Oxford–New York 2002 (Religion and Global Politics).
• ‘Q&A: Monteregno Referendum’, BBC News, 22 May 2006, at .
• ‘Skandal u Crnoj Gori dobija epilog: zatvoreno Kadijino etno selo’, Vestinet, 1 August 2012, at .
• Todorova M., Balkan Identities. Nation and Memory, London 2004.
• Todorova M., Imagining the Balkans, New York–Oxford 1997.
• Volcic Z., Serbian Spaces of Identity. Narratives of Belonging by the last “Yugo” Generation, New York 2011.
• Zanoni L., Salvare Budva dalla speculazione edilizia, Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, 22 August 2011, at .
• Zanoni L., Le sfide di Budva: turismo e urbanizzazione, Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso, 4 August 2011, at .

Identifiers

DOI

10.12797/Politeja.12.2015.31_2.06