The Invisible Immigrant Child in the Norwegian Classroom: Losing Sight of Polish Children’s Immigrant Status Through Unarticulated Differences and Behind Good Intentions

• Authors: Wærdahl Randi
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Poles are today the largest group of family immigrants to Norway. Since Polish immigration is an intra-European movement of labour, there are no specific laws or regulations, apart from labour regulations, pertaining to the introduction of Polish families to Norway and their settlement there. Consequently, there are few guidelines in schools and local authorities on dealing with Polish children in school. They receive the same introduction to school as immigrants from any other background, with no consideration of the specific characteristics of Poles. Equally, their parents are not eligible for the orientation courses and language classes that are offered to adult asylum seekers or refugees. As these are expensive, many Polish parents postpone language classes until they can afford them or find alternative ways of learning language and culture. In this article, I explore the inclusion of Polish children in Norwegian schools through the voices of teachers receiving Polish children in their classrooms and Polish mothers of children attending school in Norway. Interviews with both teachers and mothers reveal inadequate understandings of each other’s conceptions of school, education and the roles of home and school in the education of children. They also demonstrate a limited understanding of culturally bound interpretations of each other’s actions. Although both sides are committed to the idea of effective integration, we risk overlooking the social and academic challenges that Polish children face in Norwegian schools unless conceptions and expectations of school and education are articulated and actions are explained and contextualised. There is also a risk that cultural differences will be perceived as individual problems, while real individual problems may be overlooked due to poor communication between schools and families. The data is drawn from an extended case study including classroom observations, interviews with teachers and Polish mothers in Norway, and focus groups of educators and researchers in the field of social work.

Keywords

EN

school integration; home–school collaboration; egalitarianism; Polish–Norwegian migration; invisibility

• Publisher: Ośrodek Badań nad Migracjami Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego oraz Polska Akademia Nauk
• Journal: Central and Eastern European Migration Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 5
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 93-108

Contributors

author

Wærdahl Randi

References

• Bodine A. (2003). School Uniforms and Discourses on Childhood. Childhood 10(1): 43–63.
• Creswell J. W. (2013). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Los Angeles, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington DC: Sage Publications.
• Douglas M. (1996). Thought Styles. London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi: Sage Publications.
• Erickson C. (1972). Invisible Immigrants: the Adaptation of English and Scottish Immigrants in Nineteenth-century America. Coral Gables, FL: University of Miami Press.
• Friberg J. H. (2013). The Polish Worker in Norway: Emerging Patterns of Migration, Employment and Incorporation After EU’s Eastern Enlargement. PhD thesis. University of Oslo.
• Froestad J., Ravneberg B. (2006). Education Policy, the Norwegian Unitary School and the Social Construction of Disability. Scandinavian Journal of History 31(2): 119–143.
• Frønes I. (1995). Among Peers: On the Meaning of Peers in the Process of Socialization. Oslo, Stockholm, Copenhagen, Boston: Scandinavian University Press.
• Hagelund A. (2002). Problematizing Culture: Discourses on Integration in Norway. Journal of International Migration and Integration 3(3): 401–415.
• Leinonen J., Toivanen M. (2014). Researching In/Visibility in the Nordic Context: Theoretical and Empirical Views. Nordic Journal of Migration Research 4(4): 161–167.
• Muchacka B. (2014). Expert Report on the Characteristics of Polish Primary Education. TRANSFAM report. Online: http://www.transfam.socjologia.uj.edu.pl/documents/32445283/1b4b6f7f-23d... (accessed: 12 January 2016).
• NDET (Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training) (2006). The National Curriculum for Knowledge Promotion in Primary and Secondary Education and Training. Oslo: Norwegian Directorate of Education and Training.
• Swidler A. (1986). Culture in Action: Symbols and Strategies. American Sociological Review 51(2): 273–286.
• Wachowiak A. (2010). Polska socjologia rodziny w zmienionej przestrzeni społecznej minionego XX-lecia. Rocznik Lubuski 36(2): 104–113.
• Wærdahl R. (2003). Learning by Consuming. Consumer Culture as a Condition for Socialization and Everyday Life at the Age of 12. Avhandling for Dr. Polit. Rapport 4:2003. Institutt for sosiologi og samfunnsgeografi, Universitetet i Oslo.
• Wærdahl R. (2005). Small Distinctions. Socialization of (In-)Difference in Seemingly Homogenous Peer Groups. Sosiologisk Årbok 2(1): 119–134.
• Wærdahl R., Haldar M. (2013). Socializing Relations in the Everyday Lives of Children. Comparing Domestic Texts from Norway and China. Childhood 21(1): 115–130.