Women Writing Science in the Eighteenth Century: A Preliminary Approach to Their Language in Use

• Authors: Crespo Begoña
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Female authors of scientific works were few in the eighteenth century in comparison with the increasing production of male writers. Their limited presence in the scientific panorama of the period could, therefore, account for the lack of research on how these women wrote or the sort of linguistic strategies they were familiar with from a present-day perspective. Some external considerations should be also reckoned as of paramount importance: on the one hand, science as such was an underdeveloped concept at the moment. Male writers were busy in an attempt to set the grounds of science and to determine the best linguistic choices to convey scientific knowledge. On the other, it was not socially accepted that women somehow involved themselves in matters other than those such as the family or the household, or similar matters. The results obtained from the linguistic analysis point to a predominant use of modality indicating prediction and necessity in contrast to hypothetical constructions and recognizable verbs of persuasion. It follows from this that it is a modulated discourse constrained to a certain extent by the social norms of the period.

Keywords

EN

women; scientific works; female authors; The Coruña Corpus; linguistic strategies

• Publisher: Institute of English Studies, University of Warsaw
• Journal: Anglica. An International Journal of English Studies
• Year: 2015
• Issue: 24/2
• Pages: 103-127

Contributors

author

Crespo Begoña

• Universidade da Coruña

References

• Baayen, Harald R. 2001. Word Frequency Distributions. D ordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Barker-Benfield, G. J. 1992. The Culture of Sensibility: Sex and Society in Eighteenth-Century Britain. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Biber, Douglas. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Biber Douglas. 1995. Dimensions of Register Variation: A Cross-linguistic Comparison. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
• Biber, Douglas, and Susan Conrad. 2009. Register, Genre and Style. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Colby, Frank Moore, and Talcott Williams. 1930. The New International Encyclopædia. New York: Dodd, Mead and Co.
• Crespo, Begoña, and Isabel Moskowich. 2010. “CETA in the Context of the Coruña Corpus.” Literary and Linguistic Computing, 25/2: 153–164.
• Garzone, Giulia. 2004. “Annual Company Reports and CEOs’ Letters: Discoursal Features and Cultural Markedness.” Intercultural Aspects of Specialized Communication. Ed. Christopher Candlin, and Maurizio Gotti. Bern: Peter Lang. 311–342.
• Halliday, Michael Alexander Kirkwood. 2013. Introduction to Functional Grammar. London: Routledge.
• Jacob, Margaret C. 2003. “The Scientific Revolution and the Industrial Revolution. The Cultural Origins of the First Industrial Revolution.” The Scientific Revolution. Ed. Marcus Hellyer. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd. 194–215.
• McEnery, Tony, and Andrew Hardie. 2011. Corpus Linguistics: Method, Theory and Practice. Cambridge: CUP.
• Moskowich, Isabel. 2013. “Eighteenth-Century Female Authors: Women and Science in the Coruña Corpus of English Scientific Writing.” Australian Journal of Linguisitics, 33/4: 467–487.
• Moskowich, Isabel, Begoña Crespo, Camiña Gonzalo, and Inés Lareo. 2012. Corpus of English Texts on Astronomy, CETA. Amsterdam/Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Moskowich, Isabel, and Begoña Crespo. 2007. “Presenting the Coruña Corpus: A Collection of Samples for the Historical Study of English Scientific Writing.” ‘Of Varying Language and Opposing Creed’: New Insights into Late Modern English. Ed. Javier Pérez Guerra et al. Bern: Peter Lang. 341–357.
• Nikiforidou, Kiki, and Demetra Katis. 2000. “Subjectivity and Conditionality: The Marking of Speaker Involvement in Modern Greek.” Constructions in Cognitive Linguistics: Selected Papers from the International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, Amsterdam, 1997. Ed. Ad Foolen, and Frederike van der Leek. Amsterdam: John Benjamins. 217–238.
• Olmsted, Denison. 1841. Letters on Astronomy, Addressed to a Lady in which the Elements of the Science are Familiarly Explained in Connexion with its Literary History. With numerous engravings. Boston: Marsh, Capen, Lyon and Webb.
• Oxford English Dicionary. 1989. (2nd edition online version) November 2010. http://www.oed.com Accessed 15 December 2013.
• Reppen, Randi, Susan M. Fitzmaurice, and Douglas Biber, eds. 2002. Using Corpora to Explore Linguistic Variation. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. Amsterdam and Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company.
• Robinson, Mary. 1799. A Letter to the Women of England, on the Injustice of Mental Subordination. <http://www.rc.umd.edu/editions/robinson/mrletterfrst.htm Mary Robinson’s>. Accessed 9 December 2014.
• Sokól, Malgorzata. 2006. “Discoursal Construction Of Academic Identity In Cyberspace O n The Example Of An E-Seminar.” Doctoral dissertation written in The Department of English, Szczecin University, Szczecin.
• Solsona i Pairó, Nuria. 1997. Mujeres científicas de todos los tiempos. Madrid: Talasa Ediciones.
• Von Fintel, Kai and, Sabine Iatridou. 2006. “How to Say Ought in Foreign: The Composition of Weak Necessity Modals.” Paper presented at CUNY linguistics colloquium in May 2006, and at the 6th Workshop on Formal Linguistics in Florianopolis, Brazil.
• Vassileva, Irena. 2000. Who is the Author? A Contrastive Analysis of Authorial Presence in English, German, French, Russian and Bulgarian Academic Discourse. Sankt Augustin: Asgard.