PL EN


2013 | 22/2 | 113-130
Article title

Can Anything Be Put into Any Container? A Few Remarks on Possible and Impossible Metaphors Involving Synthetic, Analytical and Unique Concepts

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
The article raises important and at the same time very interesting questions about the limits and constraints on metaphors in the light of the conceptions of cognitive linguistics and some well known works like Lakoff – Johnson (1980, 1999), Turner (1990) or Krzeszowski (1997, 2006). It investigates both theoretical and practical aspects of conceptual metaphor, aiming also at identifying the apparently weak points in the reasoning of the quoted authors, especially when it comes to distinguishing between. “oneshot” and. “conventional” or even between. “possible” and. “impossible” metaphors. The author of the article tries to prove that it is very difficult to impose limitations on metaphors and brings into question, among other things, the claim that metaphorization is impossible if synthetic concepts, such as mathematical figures, are involved. In his analysis, the author refers also to the Conduit Metaphor, as seen by Reddy (1979), which seems to be very helpful in understating the processes behind the forming of other metaphorical constructions, although is often criticized by linguists as allegedly being a faulty conception structuring human communication.
Contributors
  • University of Warsaw
References
  • NODE – New Oxford Dictionary of English. (2nd ed. revised). 2005. Oxford University Press.
  • Widawski, Maciej. 2000. Nowy słownik slangu i potocznej angielszczyzny. Gdańsk: Wydawnictwo L&L.
  • Backman, Gunnar. 1991. Meaning by metaphor. An exploration of metaphor with a metaphoric reading of two short stories by Stephen Crane. Doctoral Thesis, Uppsala University. Textgruppen i Uppsala AB.
  • Brugman, Claudia. 1990. “What is the Invariance Hypothesis?”. Cognitive Linguistics 1(2): 257–266.
  • Grice, Paul H. 1975. “Logic and conversation”. In: P. Cole, and J. L. Morgan (eds.), Syntax and semantics: Vol. 3. Speech acts. (New York: Academic Press), 41–58.
  • Hartman, Robert S. 1967. The structure of value. Foundations of scientific axiology. Carbondale and Edwardsville: Southern Illinois University Press. London and Amsterdam: Feffer and Simons, Inc.
  • Johnson, Mark, and George Lakoff. 1982. “Metaphor and communication”. Reproduced by Linguistic Agency University Trier, Series A, Paper No. 97.
  • Kant, Immanuel. [1988]. Logic. Translated by R. S. Hartman and W. Schwarz. Mineola, New York: Courier Dover Publications.
  • Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 1997. “The exculpation of the Conduit Metaphor”. In: Angels and devils in hell. Elements of axiology in semantics. (Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Energeia), 169–176.
  • Krzeszowski, Tomasz P. 2006. “Czy istnieją niemożliwe metafory? – kilka uwag o ograniczeniach metaforyzacji”. [Are there impossible metaphors – a few remarks about constraints on metaphorization] In: G. Habrajska, and J. Ślósarska (eds.), Kognitywizm w poetyce i stylistyce [Cognitivism in poetics and stylistics] (Kraków: Universitas), 37–46.
  • Lakoff, George. 1990. “The contemporary theory of metaphor”. In: A. Ortony (ed.), 202–251.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1980. Metaphors we live by. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 1999. Philosophy in the flesh: the embodied mind and its challenge to Western thought. New York: Basic Books.
  • Lakoff, George, and Mark Turner. 1989. More than cool reason. A field guide to poetic metaphor. Chicago and London: The University of Chicago Press.
  • MacCormac, Earl R. 1985. A cognitive theory of metaphor. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
  • Nasiadka, Mieczysław. 2004. “The Conduit Metaphor in modern poetry”. Kwartalnik Neofilologiczny 51: 57–67.
  • Nasiadka, Mieczysław. 2009a. “The nature of meaning and its relation to the model of communication based on the Conduit Metaphor”. Komunikacja Specjalistyczna 1: 37–52.
  • Nasiadka, Mieczysław. 2009b. “Some arguments provided by Lakoff, Johnson, Turner and Direct Experience in Support of the Conduit Metaphor.” In: J. Wełna (ed.) Explorations in Language (= Anglica 18) (Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego), 109–118.
  • Ortony, Anthony. 1979. “The role of similarity in similes and metaphors”. In: A. Ortony (ed.), Metaphor and thought. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press), 186–201.
  • Ortony, Anthony (ed.). 1990. Metaphor and thought. (2nd ed.) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Reddy, Michael. 1979. “The Conduit Metaphor”. In: A. Ortony (ed.), 284–324.
  • Turner, Mark. 1990. “Aspects of the Invariance Hypothesis”. Cognitive Linguistics 1: 247–255.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-f0812bb9-03fb-4a32-a462-14892ff51dcb
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.