Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2016 | 2 | 12(17) | 6.9-6.18

Article title

Determining the Impact of Residential Neighbourhood Crime on Housing Investment Using Logistic Regression

Content

Title variants

RU
Определение влияния уровня преступности жилого микрорайона на инвестиции в жилищное строительство с использованием логистической регрессии

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
This paper discusses the impact of criminal activities on residential property value. With regard to criminal activities, the paper emphasizes on the contribution of each component of property crime. One thousand (1000) sets of structured questionnaire were administered on the residents of residential estates within the South Western States of Nigeria out of which 467 were considered useable after the data screening. Purposive and systematic sampling techniques were used while logistic regression was used to determine the impact of each of the components of residential property crime on housing investment. The results showed the P-Values of 0.000, 0.322, 0.335, 0.545 and 0.992 for violent crime, incivilities and street crime, burglary and theft, vandalism and robbery respectively. However, the R2 which represents the generalisation of the impact of neighbourhood crime on housing investment was 44 % and aggregate P-value was 0.000. Using the Hosmer and Lemeshow (H-L) test of goodness of fit, the model had approximately 89% predictive probability which is considered excellent. This indicates that the alternative hypothesis is upheld that residential neighbourhood crime is capable of impacting on residential property value. The policy implication of this result is that no effort should be spared in combating residential neighbourhood crime in order to boost and encourage housing investment.
RU
В данной статье рассматривается влияние преступной деятельности на стоимость жилой недвижимости. Что касается преступной деятельности, в работе подчеркивается вклад каждого компонента имущественных преступлений. Одна тысяча (1000) комплектов структурированного вопросника были предложены жителям жилых комплексов в южно-западных штатах Нигерии, из которых 467 были признаны полезными после скрининга данных. Использовались целенаправленные и систематические методы выборки, в то время как логистическая регрессия была использована для определения влияния каждого из компонентов преступной деятельности, связанной с жилой недвижимостью на инвестиции в жилье. Результаты показали, P-Values 0,000, 0,322, 0,335, 0,545 и 0,992 для насильственных преступлений, неучтивости и уличной преступности, взломов и краж, вандализма и грабежа соответственно. Тем не менее, R2, который представляет собой обобщение влияния преступности на инвестиции в жилищное строительство, составил 44 %, а совокупное P-значение составило 0,000. С помощью теста Хосмера и Лемешова (H-L), теста на эффективность и достоверность, модель имела примерно 89% прогностической вероятности, что считается отличным результатом. Это указывает на то, что поддерживается альтернативная гипотеза, о том, что преступность жилого района способна воздействовать на стоимость жилой недвижимости. Политическое значение этого результата состоит в том, что никаких усилий не следует жалеть в борьбе с преступностью жилого микрорайона с целью увеличения и поощрения инвестиций в жилищное строительство.

Journal

Year

Volume

2

Issue

Pages

6.9-6.18

Physical description

Dates

published
2016-12-25

Contributors

  • University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia
author
  • University Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia

References

  • Agunbiade, M. E. (2012). Land Administration for Housing Production (Doctoral thesis, University of Melbourne). Retrieved from http://csdila.unimelb.edu.au/publication/journals/ts05b_agunbiade_rajabifard_et_al_4809.pdf
  • Austin, J. T., Yaffee, R. A., & Hinkle, D. E. (1992). Logistic regression for research in higher education. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 8, 379–410.
  • Boggess, L. N., Greenbaumb, R. T., & Tita, G. E. (2013). Does crime drive housing sales? Evidence from Los Angeles. Journal of Crime and Justice, 36(3), 299-318. doi: 10.1080/0735648X.2013.812976
  • Buonanno, P., Montolio, D., & Raya-Vílchez, J. M. (2013). Housing Prices and Crime Perception, Empirical Economics, 45(1), 305-321. doi: 10.1007/s00181-012-0624-y
  • Cabrera, A. F. (1994). Logistic regression analysis in higher education: An applied perspective. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, 10, 225-256.
  • Shapiro R., & Hassett, K. (2012). The Economic Benefits of Reducing Violent Crime. Retrieved from https://cdn.americanprogress.org/wp-content/uploads/issues/2012/06/pdf/violent_crime.pdf
  • Chuang, H. L. (1997). High school youth’s dropout and re-enrollment behavior. Economics of Education Review, 16(2), 171-186. doi: 10.1016/S0272-7757(96)00058-1
  • Cox, D. R., & Snell, E. J. (1989). The analysis of binary data (2nd ed.). London: Chapman and Hall.
  • Cozens, P. (2014). Think crime! Using evidence, theory and crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) for planning safer cities. Quinns Rocks: Paxis Education.
  • Cozens, P., & Love, T. (2015). A review and current status of crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED). Journal of Planning Literature, 30(4), 393–412. doi: 10.1177/0885412215595440
  • Cozens, P., & Melenhorst, P. (2015). Exploring community perceptions of crime and crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) in Botswana. In Papers from the British Criminology Conference (Vol. 14, pp. 65–83). Retrieved from http://britsoccrim.org/new/volume14/pbcc_2014_cozens.pdf
  • Crowe, T. D., National Crime Prevention Institute (University of Louisville). (1991). Crime prevention through environmental design: Applications of architectural design and space management concepts. Boston: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Eck, J. E. (1993). The threat of crime displacement. Criminal Justice Abstracts, 25(3), 527-546. Retrieved from http://www.popcenter.org/library/psq/1993/Summer_1993_Vol_6_No_3.pdf
  • Ekblom, P., Armitage, R., Monchuk, L., & Castell, B. (2013). Crime prevention through environmental design in the United Arab Emirates: a suitable case for reorientation? Built Environment, 39(1), 92-113. doi: 10.2148/benv.39.1.92
  • Frischtak, C., & Mandel, B. R. (2012, January 1). Crime, House Prices, and Inequality: The Effect of UPPs in Rio. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.1995795
  • Gibbons, S. (2004). The Costs of Urban Property Crime*. The Economic Journal, 114(499), F441-F463. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-0297.2004.00254.x
  • Grabosky, P. (1995). Burglary prevention. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 49. Retrieved from http://aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi049.pdf
  • Greenbaum, R. T., & Tita, G. E. (2004). The impact of violence surges on neighbourhood business activity. Urban Studies, 41(13), 2495-2514. doi: 10.1080/0042098042000294538
  • Hastings, R. (2008). Prévenir le crime : réduire la criminalité et accroître la sécurité dans un Canada ouvert à tous [Achieving Crime Prevention: Reducing Crime and increasing Security in an inclusive Canada]. Ottawa: University of Ottawa (in French).
  • Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Introduction to the logistic regression model. In Applied Logistic Regression (2nd ed.) (pp. 1-30). doi: 10.1002/9781118548387.ch1
  • Ihlanfeldt, K., & Mayock, T. (2010). Crime and housing prices. In B. Benson, P. Zimmerman, Handbook on the economics of crime (pp. 303-327). Cheltenham Glos: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  • Lei, P.-W., & Koehly, L. M. (2003). Linear discriminant analysis versus logistic regression: A comparison of classification errors in the Two-Group Case. The Journal of Experimental Education, 72(1), 25–49. doi: 10.1080/00220970309600878
  • Long, J. S. (1997). Regression models for categorical and limited dependent variables. London: Sage.
  • Linden, L., & Rockoff, J. E. (2008). Estimates of the impact of crime risk on property values from Megan's laws. The American Economic Review, 98(3), 1103-1127. doi: 10.1257/aer.98.3.1103
  • Lynch, A. K., & Rasmussen, D. W. (2001). Measuring the impact of crime on house prices. Applied Economics, 33(15), 1981–1989. doi: 10.1080/00036840110021735
  • Maximino, M. (2014, March 12). The impact of crime on property values: Research roundup. Retrieved from https://journalistsresource.org/studies/economics/real-estate/the-impact-of-crime-on-property-values-research-roundup
  • Menard, S. (2000). Coefficients of determination for multiple logistic regression analysis. The American Statistician, 54(1), 17–24. doi: 10.2307/2685605
  • Moreto, W. (2010). Risk factors of urban residential burglary. RTM Insights, 4, 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.rutgerscps.org/uploads/2/7/3/7/27370595/burglaryrisks.pdf
  • Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. Biometrika, 78(3), 691–692. doi: 10.2307/2337038
  • Olajide, S, E. & Lizam, M. (2016). Residential neighbourhood Security challenges: Assessing crime prevention concepts and Techniques. International Journal of Academic Research and Development, 1(9), 7–15.
  • Olajide, S. E., Lizam, M., & Adewole, A. (2015). Towards a crime-Free Housing: CPTED versus CPSD. Journal of Environment and Earth Science, 5(18), 53–63. Retrieved from http://www.iiste.org/Journals/index.php/JEES/article/view/26022/26570
  • Owusu, G., Wrigley-Asante, C., Oteng-Ababio, M., & Owusu, A. Y. (2015). Crime prevention through environmental design (CPTED) and built-environmental manifestations in Accra and Kumasi, Ghana. Crime Prevention & Community Safety, 17(4), 249-269. doi: 10.1057/cpcs.2015.8
  • Pallant, J. (2011). SPSS Survival Manual. A step by step guide to data analysis using the SPSS program (4th ed.). Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
  • Peng, C. J. & Lee, K. L. & Ingersoll, G. M. (2002). An Introduction to Logistic Regression Analysis and Reporting. The Journal of Educational Research, 96(1), 3–14. doi: 10.1080/00220670209598786.
  • Ratcliffe, J. (2001). Policing urban burglary. Trends & Issues in Crime and Criminal Justice, 213. Retrieved from http://www.aic.gov.au/media_library/publications/tandi_pdf/tandi213.pdf
  • Sutton, A., Cherney, A., & White, R. (2013). Crime prevention: principles, perspectives and practices. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2001). Using multivariate statistics (4th ed.). Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
  • Tita, G. E., Petras, T. L., & Greenbaum, R. T. (2006). Crime and Residential Choice: A Neighborhood Level Analysis of the Impact of Crime on Housing Prices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22(4), 299–317. doi: 10.1007/s10940-006-9013-z
  • Tolman, R. M., & Weisz, A. (1995). Coordinated community intervention for domestic violence: The effects of arrest and prosecution on recidivism of woman abuse perpetrators. Crime and Delinquency, 41(4), 481–495. doi: 10.1177/0011128795041004007
  • The John Howard Society of Alberta. (1995). Crime Prevention through Social Development: A Literature Review. Retrieved from http://www.johnhoward.ab.ca/pub/old/pdf/C6.pdf
  • Troy, A., & Grove, J. M. (2008). Property values, parks, and crime: A hedonic analysis in Baltimore, MD. Landscape and urban planning, 87(3), 233–245. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2008.06.005
  • Waller, I., & Weiler, D. (1985). Crime prevention through social development. Ottawa: Canadian Council on Social Development. Retrieved from https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/103113NCJRS.pdf

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-f19825db-b8b2-47d3-b6a3-1e8feaadbb2a
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.