2018 | 3 (47) | 537-552
Article title

Amnesties: conditio sine qua non for a Lasting Peace Solution or Ticking Time Bomb for Peacebuilding?

Title variants
Languages of publication
The author attempts to define amnesty and describe conditions that must be met for amnesties to be in accordance with international law. This in turn involves an analysis of legality of amnesties. The paper also examines motivation for granting amnesty and desirability as well as the future of granting amnesties. In the end a nuanced approach is adopted highlighting the fact that amnesties are neither conditio sine qua non for a lasting peace solution nor ticking time-bombs for peacebuilding. This reflects the idea of this paper that justice is not an absolute and sometimes it might be necessary to let go and combine judicial and non-judicial mechanisms (including the disclosure of truth and reparations for the victims) in order to achieve sustainable peace.
Physical description
  • Nicolaus Copernicus University in Toruń (Poland)
  • Additional Protocol II (1977). Retrieved from:
  • Almonacid-Arellano v. Chile (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment 2006). Retrieved from:
  • Aksenova, M. (2017). Achieving Justice Through Restorative Means in Colombia: New Developments in Implementing the Peace Deal. Retrieved from:
  • Barnett, M., Kim, H., O’Donnell, M., Sitea, L. (2007). “Peacebuilding: What Is in a Name?”. Global Governance 13, p. 35 – 58.
  • Barrios Altos v. Peru (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment 2001). Retrieved from:
  • Boutros-Ghali B. (1992). An Agenda for Peace. Retrieved from:
  • Close 1, J. (2016). The International Legal Status of Amnesties Granted for Serious Crimes: Historical and Contemporary Perspectives, Middlesex: PhD thesis.
  • Close 2, J. (2016). Meeting International Standards: Amnesty in the Colombian Peace Deal. Retrieved from:
  • Colombia referendum: Voters reject Farc peace deal (2016). Retrieved from:
  • Diaz, F.A., Robledo, V.M. (2016). Uncertainty, Peace Agreements, and Public Participation in Colombia. Retrieved from:
  • Engle, K. (2016). “A Genealogy of the Criminal Turn in Human Rights”. In Engle, K., Miller, Z., Davis D.M. (eds), Anti-Impunity and the Human Rights Agenda (p. 24 – 67). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • “Final Accord for the Termination of the Conflict and the Construction of a Stable and Lasting Peace in Colombia signed on 24 November 2016”. Retrieved from:
  • Freeman, M. (2009). Necessary Evils: Amnesties and the Search for Justice, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Gelman v. Uruguay (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment 2011, Merits and Reparations). Retrieved from:
  • Gomes Lund et al. v. Brazil (Inter-American Court of Human Rights, Judgment 2010). Retrieved from:
  • Huyse, L. (2003). “Justice”. In Bloomfield, D., Barnes, T., Huyse, L. (eds), Reconciliation After Violent Conflict. A Handbook (p. 97 – 121), Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
  • Huyse, L., Salter M. (eds) (2008). Traditional Justice and Reconciliation after Violent Conflict. Learning from African Experiences, Stockholm: International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance.
  • ICC Statute (1998). Retrieved from:
  • Igreja, V. (2015). “Amnesty Law, Political Struggles for Legitimacy and Violence in Mozambique”. Interna­tional Journal of Transitional Justice 9 (2), p. 239 – 258.
  • Komosa, M. (2014). Komisja prawdy. Mechanizm odpowiedzialności za naruszenie praw człowieka, Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • “Law on the Establishment of the Extraordinary Chambers”. Retrieved from:
  • Mali coup leader charged with murder (2013). Retrieved from:
  • Mallinder, L. (2016). “The End of Amnesty Regional Overreach? Interpreting the Erosion of South Africa’s Amnesty Laws”. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 3, p. 645 – 680.
  • Marguš v. Croatia (European Court of Human Righjts, Judgment 2014). Retrieved from: (accessed 01.06.2017).
  • Mullenbach, M.J. (2006). “Reconstructing strife-torn societies. Third-party peacebuilding in intrastate disputes”. In Mason, T. D., Meernik, J. D. (eds), Conflict Prevention and Peacebuilding in Post-War Societies. Sustaining the Peace (p. 53 – 80). New Jork-London: Routledge Taylor & Francis Group.
  • Negotiating Justice? Human Rights and Peace Agreements (2006), International Council on Human Rights Policy. Retrieved from:
  • Ntoubandi, F.Z. (2009). Amnesty for Crimes against Humanity under International Law, Leiden: Brill.
  • O’Shea, A. (2004) Amnesty for Crimes in International Law and Practice, The Hague.
  • Poroshenko signs long-awaited law on amnesty for Ukraine soldiers with minor offences (2017). Retrieved from:
  • Peace First, Justice Later. Traditional Justice in Northern Uganda (2005). Retrieved from:,-justice-later-traditional-justice-in-northern-uganda.html.
  • “Prosecutor v. Allieu Kondewa (Decision on Preliminary Motion on the Invalidity of the Agreement between the United Nations and the Government of Sierra Leone on the Establishment of the Special Court) (2004), separate opinion of Justice Robertson. Retrieved from:
  • “Report of the Secretary General of the United Nations. The rule of law and transitional justice in societies that suffer or have suffered from conflict” (2004). Retrieved from:
  • Sánchez, C.F. (2016). “Manipulating Truths: Media Coverage, Democracy, and the Colombian Referendum”. Retrieved from:
  • Scharf, M.P. (1999). “The Amnesty Exception to the Jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court”. Cornell International Law Journal 32, p. 507 – 527.
  • “Special Court for Sierra Leone Statute”. Retrieved from:
  • “Special Tribunal for Lebanon”. Retrieved from:
  • Summary of Colombia’s Agreement to End Conflict and Build Peace (2016). Retrieved from:­
  • Šimonović, I. (2003). “Post-Conflict Peace Building: The New Trends”. International Journal of Legal Information 31, p. 251 – 263.
  • The Belfast Guidelines on Amnesty and Accountability with Explanatory Guidance (2013). Transitional Justice Institute at the University of Ulster. Retrieved from:
  • “The Massacres of El Mozote and Nearby Places v. El Salvador (Judgment 2012, Merits, reparations and costs)”. Retrieved from:
  • Van Zyl, P. (2005). “Promoting Transitional Justice in Post-Conflict Societies”. In Bryden, A., Hänggi, H. (Eds.), Security Governance in Post-Conflict Peacebuilding (p. 23 – 43), Geneva: Geneva Centre for the Democratic Control of Armed Forces.
  • Vásquez, J.G. (2016). “Just like the Brexit vote, the Colombian referendum was corrupted by lies”. Retrieved from:
  • Wiatr, K. (2009). “Komisja Prawdy i Pojednania oraz amnestii w RPA – moralne i prawne problem a szanse na pojednanie”. In Żelichowski R. (ed), Świat i Polska wobec globalnych wyzwań. Wybrane zagadnienia, Warsaw: Oficyna Wydawniczo-Poligraficzna Konika.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.