Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2008 | 1(3) | 91-107

Article title

Budżetowanie wynikowe. Reformowanie złożonych systemów adaptacyjnych

Content

Title variants

EN
Performance Budgeting. Reforming a Complex Adaptive System

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Artykuł prezentuje uwarunkowania wdrażania budżetowania wynikowego w jednostkach sektora publicznego. Problematyka ta analizowana jest w odniesieniu do założeń nowego zarządzania publicznego. Prezentowane są związki budżetowania wynikowego z planowaniem strategicznym i determinacją kadry zarządzającej. W tekście analizowane są różnego typu bariery budżetowania wynikowego. Autorzy analizują problemy związane z systemem pomiaru wyników działań podejmowanych w sektorze publicznym, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem konsekwencji istnienia złożonych układów adaptacyjnych. Istotna rola w procesie budżetowania wynikowego przypisywana jest kierownictwu szczebla operacyjnego.
EN
The article discusses the determinants inherent in the implementation of performance budgeting in public sector administration. Relevant issues are analysed against the background of the principles of the new public management and the links between performance budgeting, strategic planning and management determination. The paper reviews various obstacles to performance budgeting. The Authors discuss the issues related to the system of performance measurement of public sector activity with a special focus on the ramifications of complex adaptive systems. A vital role in the process of performance budgeting is attributed to management at the operational level.

Contributors

  • Binghamton University
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny Kraków
  • Binghamton University

References

  • Argyris Ch., Putnam R.,McLain Smith D. (1985). Action Science: Concepts, Methods, and Skills for Research and Intervention. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  • Barrados M., Mayne J. (2003). "Can Public Sector Organizations Learn?", OECD Journal on Budgeting, t. 3, nr 3, s. 87-103.
  • Bowerman M., Ball A., Francis G. (2001). "Benchmarking as a Tool for the Modernisation of Local Government", Financial Accountability and Management, t.17, nr 4, s. 321-329.
  • Boyne G. i in. (2002). "Plans, Performance Information and Accountability: The Case of Best Value", Public Administration, t. 80, nr 4, s. 691-710.
  • Broom Ch.A. (1995). "Performance-Based Government Models: Building a Track Record", Public Budgeting and Finance, zima, s. 3-17.
  • Brorströim B. (1998). "Accrual Accounting, Politics and Politicians", Financial Accountability and Management, 1.14, nr 4, s. 319-333.
  • Brusis M., Dimitrov V. (2001). "Executive Configuration and Fiscal Performance in Post-Communist Central and Eastern Europe", Journal of European Public Policy, t. 8, nr 6, s. 888-910.
  • Burns R.C., Lee Jr. R.D. (2004). "The Ups and Downs of State Budget Process Reform: Experience of Three Decades", Public Budgeting and Finance, s. 1-19.
  • Choo Ch.W. (1998). The knowing organization: How organizations use information to construct meaning, create knowledge, and make decisions. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Cole A., Jones G. (2005). "Reshaping the State: Administrative Reform and New Public Management in France", Governance, 1.18, nr 4, s. 567-588.
  • DiBella AJ. (2003). "Organizations as learning portfolios", w: A. Easterby-Smith, M.A. Lyles (red.), The Blackwell Handbook of Organizational Leaning and Knowledge Management. Maiden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
  • Dixon G. (2005). "Thailand's Quest for Results-Focused Budgeting", International Journal of Public Administration, t. 28, s. 355-370.
  • Franklin A.L, Carberry-George B. (1999). "Analyzing How Local Governments Establish Service Priorities", Public Budgeting and Finance, jesień, s. 31-46.
  • Gargan J.L. (1981). "Consideration of Local Government Capacity", Public Administration Review, listopad-grudzień, s. 649-658.
  • Gilmour J.B., Lewis D.E. (2006). "Does Performance Budgeting Work? An Examination of the Office of Management and Budget's PART Scores", Public Administration Review, wrzesień-październik, s. 742-752.
  • Greenwood D.J., Levin M. (2007). Introduction to Action Research: Social Research for Social Change. wyd. 2, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Groot T., Budding T. (2004). "The Influence of New Public Management Practices on Product Costing and Service Pricing Decisions in Dutch Municipalities", Financial Accountability and Management, t. 20, nr 4, s. 421-443.
  • Hallier J., James Ph. (1997). "Middle Managers and the Employee Psychological Contract: Agency, Protection and Advancement", Journal of Management Studies, t. 34, nr 5, s. 703-728.
  • Hatry H. ( 1999). Performance Measurement: Getting Results. Washington: Urban Institute Press.
  • Heron J. (1996). Co-operative inquiry: Research into the human condition. New York: Sage Publication.
  • Holland J.H. (1995). Hidden order: How adaptation builds complexity. New York: Helix Books.
  • Johnson G., Smith S., Codling B. (2000). "Micro-processes in Institutional Change in the Context of Privatization", Academy of Management Review, t. 25, nr 3, s. 572-580.
  • Kauffman S. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for the laws of self-organization. New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Kelly J.M., Rivenbark W.C. (2003). Performance Budgeting for State and Local Government. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe.
  • Lipsky M. (1980). Street Level Bureaucracy. New York: Rüssel Sage Foundation.
  • Maynard-Moody S., Musheno M. (2000). "State Agent or Citizen Agent: Two Narratives of Discretion", Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 1.10, nr 2, s. 329-358.
  • McElroy M.W. (2003). The new knowledge management: Complexity, learning, and sustainable innovation. New York: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  • Melkers J., Willoughby K. (2005). "Models of Performance-Measurement Use in Local Governments: Understanding Budgeting, Communication, and Lasting Effects", Public Administration Review, t. 65, nr 2, s. 180-190.
  • Mischen P., Sinclair T.A.P. (2QQ7]. Implementation and Action Research (maszynopis niepublikowany).
  • Mischen P. (2007). "Intraorganizational implementation research: Theory and method", Journal of Public Administration Research & Theory, październik, doi: 10.1093/jopart/mul027.
  • Mikesell J.L. (2006). Fiscal Administration: Analysis and Applications for the Public Sector, wyd. 7, Belmont, CA: Thomson.
  • North D.C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  • Osborne D., Gaebler T. (1992). Reinventing Government. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Ostrom E., Gardner R, Walker J. (1994). Rules, Games, &? Common-pool Resources. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press.
  • Poister Т.Н., Streib G. (1989). "Management Tools in Municipal Government: Trends over the Past Decade", Public Administration Review, maj-czerwiec, s. 240-248.
  • Pollitt Ch. (2001). "Clarifying Convergence: Striking Similarities and Durable Differences in Public Management Reform", Public Management Review, t. 4, nr 1, s. 471-492.
  • Posner P. (2006). "Accountability Institutions and the Policy Process: The United States Experience", OECD Journal on Budgeting, t. 5, nr 3, s. 71-96.
  • Pressman J.L., Wildavsky A. (1984). Implementation, wyd. 3. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  • Sanderson I. (2001). "Performance Management, Evaluation and Learning in "Modern" Local Government", Public Administration, t. 79, nr 2, s. 297-313.
  • Schick A. (1990). "Budgeting for Results: Recent Developments in Five Industrialized Countries", Public Administration Review, styczeń-luty, s. 26-34.
  • Schick A. (1998). A Contemporary Approach to Public Expenditure Management. Washington: The World Bank Institute, http://wwwl.worldbank.org/publicsector/pe/PEM_book.pdf.
  • Schultz R. (2002). "Complexity and management: Why does it matter?", w: M.R. Lissack (red.), The interaction of complexity and management, s. 131-138. Wesport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • Tasaka H. (2002). "Twenty-first-century management and the complexity paradigm", w: M.R. Lissack (red.), The interaction of complexity and management, s. 131-138. Wesport, CT: Quorum Books.
  • VanLandingham G., Wellman M., Andrews M. (2005). "Useful, But Not a Panacea: Performance-Based Program Budgeting in Florida", International Journal of Public Administration, nr 28, s. 233-253.
  • Wagenaar H. (2004). ""Knowing" the Rules: Administrative Work as Practice", Public Administration Review, t. 64, nr 6, s. 643-655.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-f50d71ff-9829-4945-82be-9cb4e03fb506
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.