PL EN


2011 | 4/2011 (34) t.1 | 7-25
Article title

Krytyczna wizja kultury organizacyjnej

Content
Title variants
EN
A critical vision of organizational culture
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
Przedstawiona w tym artykule analiza koncentruje się na problemach podnoszonych przez reprezentantów nurtu krytycznego w zarządzaniu zasobami ludzkimi, dotyczących instrumentalnej i opresyjnej roli kultury organizacyjnej. Kultura organizacyjna była przedmiotem kontrowersji od początku powstania samego pojęcia. Zatem refleksja krytyczna nie jest oczywiście wyłącznie prowadzona na gruncie nurtu krytycznego zarządzania (Critical Management Studies). Niemniej jednak przedstawiciele nurtu krytycznego proponują najbardziej radykalne oraz refleksyjne podejście, które syntezuje szereg wątków pojawiających się we wcześniejszych krytykach.
EN
The analysis presented in this article focuses on the problems raised by representatives of the critical approach in human resource management and concerns the instrumental and oppressive role of organizational culture. Organizational culture has been the subject of controversy since the inception of the concept. Thus, critical reflection is of course not only conducted on the basis of Critical Management Studies (CMS). Nevertheless, representatives of CMS propose the most radical and reflexive approach that synthesizes a number of topics that appear in earlier criticism.
Keywords
Year
Pages
7-25
Physical description
Dates
published
2011-11-30
Contributors
References
  • Alvesson, M. 2002. Understanding Organizational Culture, London: Sage.
  • Alvesson, M. i H. Willmott 1992a. Critical Management Studies, London: Sage.
  • Alvesson, M. i H. Willmott 1992b. On the Idea of Emancipation in Management and Organization Studies. Academy of Management Review, nr 3 (17), s. 432–464.
  • Alvesson, M. i H. Willmott 1996. Making Sense of Management: A Critical Introduction, London: Sage.
  • Alvesson, M. i S. Deetz 2000. Doing Critical Management Research, London: Sage.
  • Bourdieu, P. 1987. Espace social et pouvoir symbolique. Choses dites, Paris: Minuit.
  • Bourdieu, P. 2009. Rozum praktyczny: o teorii działania, Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.
  • Bourdieu, P. i J.-C. Passeron 1970. A Reproduction. Eléments pour une théorie du système d’enseignement, Paris: Les Éditions de Minuit Collection Sens Commun.
  • Boxall, P., Purcell, J. i P. Wright 2007. The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, Oxford.
  • Brewis, J. i J. Gavin 2009. Culture: Broadening the Critical Repertoire, w: M. Alvesson,
  • T. Bridgman, H. Willmott (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, s. 234–235. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Brief, A.P. 2000. Still Servants of Power. Journal of Management Inquiry, nr 4 (9).
  • Brownlie, D., Saren, M., Wensley, R. i R. Whittington (red.) 1999. Rethinking Marketing: Towards Critical Marketing Acccountings, London: Sage.
  • Chan, A. 2001. Toward a Genealogy of Organizational Culture. The Perspectives of Foucault, Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins Publishing Company,
  • Chiapello, E. i N. Fairclough 2008. Nowa ideologia zarządzania. Podejście transdyscy- plinarne krytycznej analizy dyskursu i nowej socjologii kapitalizmu, w: A. Duszak i N. Fairclough (red.) Krytyczna analiza dyskursu. Interdyscyplinarne podejście do komunikacji społecznej, Kraków: UNIVERSITAS.
  • Chomsky, N. 2006. Powers and Prospects: Reflections on Human Nature and the Social
  • Order, Boston: South End Press.
  • Chomsky, N. 2010. Making the Future: The Unipolar Imperial Moment, City Lights Pub- lishers.
  • Contu, A. 2009. Critical Management Education, w: M. Alvesson, T. Bridgman i H. Will- mott (red.) The Oxford Handbook of Critical Management Studies, chapter 27, s. 536–550. Oxford–New York: Oxford University Press.
  • Czarniawska, B. i P. Gagliardi (red.) Management Education and Humanities, Cheltenham, Northampton: Edward Elgar. Deetz, S.A. 1992. Democracy in an Age of Corporate Colonization, New York: State University of New York Press.
  • Duberley, J. i P. Johnson 2003. Understanding Management Research: An Introduction to Epistemology, London: Sage.
  • Erdoğan, İ. 2006. Recommendations on Media and Ethics, Proceedings “International Symposium on Media and Ethics”, 3–4.11.2006, http://www.siyasaliletisim.org/pdf/medyaveetikkongrebildirileri.pdf.
  • Goffman, E. 1975. Charakterystyka instytucji totalnych, w: Elementy Teorii Socjologicznych, Warszawa: PWN.
  • Grey, C. i H.C. Willmott 2005. Critical Management Studies: A Reader, Oxford University Press.
  • Harding, N. 2003. The Social Construction of Management, London: Routledge.
  • Hart, J. 2009. Loyal Subjects? Consumer Surveillance in the Personal Information Economy, Library and Archives Canada.
  • Hatch, M.J. i M. Schultz 1996. Living With Multiple Paradigms: The Case of Paradigm Interplay in Organizational Culture Studies. Academy of Management Review, nr 2 (21), s. 529–557.
  • Höpfl, H. 1992. The Making of the Corporate Acolyte: Some Thoughts on Charismatic Leadership and the Reality of Organizational Commitment. Journal of Management Studies, nr 1 (29), s. 23–33.
  • Klein, N. 2004. No Logo, Izabelin: Świat Literacki.
  • Knights, D.H. i C. Willmott 1987. Organizational Culture as Management Strategy: A Critique and Illustration from the Financial Services Industry. International Studies of Management & Organization, nr 3, s. 40–63.
  • Koch, R. i I. Godden 1996. Managing without Management: A Post-Management Manifesto for Business Simplicity, London: Nicholas Brealey.
  • Kunda, G. 1992. Engineering Culture. Control and Commitment in a High-Tech Corporation, Philadelphia: Temple University Press.
  • Lace, S. 2005. The Glass Consumer: Life in a Surveillance Society, National Consumer Council, Policy Press.
  • Lyon, D. 2003. Surveillance as Social Sorting: Privacy, Risk, and Digital Discrimination, Routledge.
  • Lyon, D. 2006. Theorizing Surveillance: The Panopticon and Beyond – Reference, Information and Interdisciplinary Subjects Series, Willan Publishing.
  • Marcuse, H. 1991. One-dimensional Man: Studies in Ideology of Advanced Industrial Society, London: Routledge. Micklethwait, J. i A. Wooldridge 2000. The World Tomorrow: The Essentials of Globalization, New York: Times Books.
  • Milgram, S. 1974. Obedience to Authority, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Monin, N. 2004. Management Theory. A Critical and Reflective Reading, London–New York: Routledge.
  • Morgan, G. (red.) 1983. Beyond Method: Strategies for Social Research, Beverly Hills: Sage. OECD 2004. Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, OECD Publis- hing.
  • Olson, G.A. 2002. Justifying Belief: Stanley Fish and the Work of Rhetoric, Albany: State University of New York Press.
  • Parker, M. 2002. Against Management: Organization in the Age of Managerialism, Wiley– –Blackwell.
  • Perriton, L. i M. Reynolds 2004. Critical Management Education: From Pedagogy of Possibility to Pedagogy of Refusal? Management Learning, nr 1 (35), s. 61–77.
  • Peters, T.J. i R.H. Waterman, Jr. 1982. In Search of Excellence: Lessons From America’s Best-Run Companies, New York: Harper & Row.
  • Potterfield, T. 1999. The Business of Employee Empowerment: Democracy and Ideology in the Workplace, Quorum Books.
  • Ravitch, D. 2003. The Language Police: How Pressure Groups Restrict What Students Learn, Knopf.
  • Schwartz, H.S. 2010. Society against Itself: Political Correctness and Organizational Self- Destruction, London: Karnac Books,
  • Smircich, L. 1989. Koncepcje kultury a analiza organizacyjna, w: A. Marcinkowski i J B. Sobczak (red.) Wybrane zagadnienia socjologii organizacji. Część II: Perspektywa kulturowa w badaniach organizacji, s. 37–60. Kraków: Uniwersytet Jagielloński.
  • Sułkowski, Ł. 2003. Groźne oblicze organizacji – dehumanizacja w zarządzaniu personelem, w: J. Stankiewicz (red.) Współczesne problemy i koncepcje zarządzania, s. 125–130. Zielona Góra: Uniwersytet Zielonogórski.
  • Sułkowski, Ł. 2007a. Application des techniques d’empowerment dans les projects d’emamcipation dirige vers les groupes defavorise, w : C. Martin (red.) L’Europe et le developpement regional. Politiques communautaires, entrepreneuriat et mobilisation de la societe civile, Lisboa: PGV/AESIC ISLA.
  • Sułkowski, Ł. 2007b. Empowerment Methods in Social Projects Managements. Intercultural
  • Management Studies, nr 18.
  • Tinker, T. 1985. Paper Prophets: A Social Critique of Accounting, New York: Praeger.
  • Willmott, H. 1993. Strength is Ignorance; Slavery is Freedom: Managing Culture in Modern Organizations. Journal of Management Studies, nr 4 (30), s. 515-552.
  • Willmott, H. 1995. What Has Been Happening in Organization Theory and Does it Matter? Personnel Review, nr 9 (24), s. 33–53.
  • Willmott, H. 2003. Renewing Strength: Corporate Culture Revisited. Management, nr 3 (6), s. 73–87.
  • Zawadzki, M. 2010. Autorytet symboliczny jako wyzwanie dla edukacji menedżerskiej i nauk o zarządzaniu, w: L. Witkowski i M. Jaworska-Witkowska (red.) Pedagogika i zarządzanie edukacją i rozwojem. W perspektywie troski o uniwersytet i kulturę humanistyczną, seria: „Przebudzenia Humanistyczne. Kolokwia”, tom I, s. 222–248. Toruń: Wydawnictwo Adam Marszałek.
  • Zimbardo, P.G., Maslach, C. i C. Haney 2000. Reflections on the Stanford Prison Exper- iment: Genesis, transformations, consequences, w: T. Blass, Obedience to Authority: Current Perspectives on the Milgram Paradigm, s. 193–237. Mahwah: Erlbaum.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1644-9584
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-f6e1b470-d82e-40f8-9dda-06a56b0e97b3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.