2018 | 18 | 2 | 34-68
Article title


Title variants
Languages of publication
The purpose of this study was to compare the attitude of Iranian and non-Iranian English language students’ attitudes towards Computer-Assisted Language Learning (CALL). Furthermore, the relations of gender, education level, and age to their attitude are investigated. A convergent mixed methods design was used for analyzing both quantitative and qualitative data. In the data collection procedure, an online 44-item web-based questionnaire was applied in order to collect data from 415 students. In the data analysis phase, both descriptive and non-parametric analyses were performed. The findings of the study revealed that there is no difference between the attitudes of Iranian and non-Iranian towards CALL. Finally, pedagogical implications and recommendations for further research are presented.
Physical description
  • University of Córdoba
  • University of Córdoba
  • AbuSeileek, A. F. & Abu Sa’aleek, A. O. (2012). Computer assisted language learning: Merits and demerits. Language in India, 12(4), 23-36.
  • Almahboub, S. F. (2000). Attitudes toward Computer Use and Gender Differences among Kuwaiti Sixth-Grade Students. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas, Denton.
  • Barson, J. & Debski, R. (1996). Calling back CALL: technology in the service of foreign language learning based on creativity, contingency, and goal-oriented activity. In M. Warschauer (Ed.), Telecollaboration in Foreign Language Learning (pp. 49-68). Honolulu: University of Hawaii, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
  • Baylor, A. L. & Ritchie, D. (2002). What factors facilitate teacher skill, teacher morale, and perceived student learning in technology-using classrooms? Computers and Education, 39, 395-414.
  • Belz, J. A. (2002). Social dimensions of telecollaborative foreign language study. Language Learning & Technology, 6(1), 60-81. Retrieved September 24, 2003, from
  • Belz, J. A. & Thorne, S. L. (2006). Internet-Mediated Intercultural Foreign Language Education. Boston: Thomson Heinle.
  • Breckler, S. J. (1984). Empirical validation of affect, behavior, and cognition as distinct components of attitude. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 47, 1191-1205.
  • Breckler, S. J. & Berman, J. S. (1991). Affective responses to attitude objects: Measurement and validation. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6, 529-544.
  • Breckler, S. J. & Wiggins, E. C. (1989). Affect versus evaluation in the structure of attitudes. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 253-271.
  • Breckler, S. J. & Wiggins, E. C. (1991). Cognitive responses in persuasion: Affective and evaluative determinants. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 180-200.
  • Cabrini Simões, L. (2007). An overview on the use of new technologies in English language teaching. Acta Scientiarum. Human and Social Sciences, 29(1), 31-34.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer Applications in Second Language Acquisition: Foundations for Teaching, Testing, and Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2003). English Language Learning and Technology. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
  • Chapelle, C. A. (2008). Computer Assisted Language Learning. In B. Spolsky & F. M. Hult (Eds.), The Handbook of Educational Linguistics (pp. 585-595). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
  • Chapelle, C. & Jamieson, J. (1986). Computer-Assisted Language Learning as a predictor of success in acquiring English as a second language. TESOL Quarterly, 20, 27-41.
  • Chen, X.-B. (2013). Tablets for informal language learning: Student usage and attitudes. Language Learning & Technology, 17(1), 20-36.
  • Chirimbu, C. S. & Tafazoli, D. (2013). Technology & media: Applications in language classrooms (TEFL, TESL & TEOL). Professional Communication & Translation Studies, 6(1/2), 187-194.
  • Corrêa, D. M. (2001). New technologies in teaching and learning English. In M. B. M. Fortkamp & R. P. Xavier (Eds.), EFL Teaching and Learning in Brazil: Theory and Practice (pp. 211-222). Florianópolis: Insular.
  • Creswell, J. W. & Plano Clark, V. L. (2011). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  • Davis, F. (1993). User acceptance of information technology: System characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, 38, 475–487.
  • Department of Education and Early Childhood Development (DEECD). (2010). Teaching and learning with Web 2.0 technologies. State of Victoria. Retrieved from
  • Donato, R., Antonek, J. & Tucker, G. R. (1994). A multiple perspective analysis of a Japanese FLES program. Foreign Language Annals, 27, 365-377.
  • Donato, R., Antonek, J. & Tucker, G. R. (1996). Monitoring and assessing a Japanese FLES program: Ambiance and achievement. Language Learning, 46, 497-528.
  • Doughty, C. J. & Long, M. H. (2003). Optimal psycholinguistic environments for distance foreign language learning. Language Learning & Technology, 7(3), 50-80.
  • Dudeney, G., Hockly, N. & Pegrum, M. (2013). Digital Literacies. London: Pearson Education.
  • Eagly, A. H. & Chaiken, S. (1998). Attitude, Structure and Function. In D. T. Gilbert, T. S. Fisk, & G. Lindsey (Eds.), Handbook of Social Psychology (pp. 269–322). New York: McGowan-Hill.
  • Fang, X. & Warschauer, M. (2004). Technology and curricular reform in China: A case study. TESOL Quarterly, 38(2), 301-321.
  • Field, A. (2005). Discovering Statistics Using SPSS (2nd ed.). London: SAGE.
  • Fishbein, M. & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction in Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
  • Gillespie, H. (2006). Unlocking Learning and Teaching with ICT: Identifying and Overcoming Barriers. London: David Fulton.
  • Godwin-Jones, R. (2006). Tag clouds in the blogosphere: Electronic literacy and social networking. Language Learning & Technology, 10(2), 8-15.
  • Hall, I. & Higgins, S. (2005). Primary school students’ perception of interactive whiteboards. Journal of Computer Assisted Language Learning, 21(2), 102-117.
  • Han, W. (2008). Benefits and barriers of computer assisted language learning and teaching. US-China Foreign Language, 6(9), 40-43.
  • Hope, G. R., Taylor, H. F. & Pusack, J. P. (1984). Using Computers in Teaching Foreign Languages. New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
  • Ismail, A. & Almekhlafi, A. G. (2010). Teachers’ perceptions of the use of technology in teaching languages in United Arab Emirates’ schools. International Journal for Research in Education, 27, 37-56.
  • Jacobsen, D. M. & Lock, J. V. (2005). Technology and teacher education for a knowledge era: Mentoring for student futures, not our past. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 12(1), 75-87.
  • Kaiser, H. F. & Rice. J. (1974). Little jiffy, mark iv. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 34(1), 111–117.
  • Kiesler, C. A., Collins, B. E. & Miller, N. (1969). Attitude Change: A Critical Analysis of Theoretical Approaches. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
  • Lacina, J. (2004). Promoting language acquisitions: Technology and English language learners. Childhood Education, 81, 113-115.
  • Lee, K.-W. (2000). English teacher’s barrier to the use of computer-assisted language learning. The Internet TESL Journal, VI (12). Retrieved from
  • Levy, M. (1997). CALL: Context and Conceptualization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Liaw, S. S. (2002). An Internet survey for perceptions of computers, and the World Wide Web: Relationship, prediction, and difference. Computers in Human Behavior, 18(1), 17–35.
  • Loyd, B. H. & Gressard, C. (1984). The effects of sex, age, and computer experience on computer attitudes. AEDS Journal, 18, 67-77.
  • Mantle-Bromley, C. (1995). Positive attitudes and realistic beliefs: Links to proficiency. The Modern Language Journal, 79, 371-386.
  • Mantle-Bromley, C. & Miller, R. B. (1991). Effect of multicultural lessons on attitudes of students of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 75, 418-425.
  • Matsumoto, D. & Yoo, S.H. (2006). Toward a new generation of cross-cultural research. Perspectives on Psychological Science,1(3), 234-250.
  • Maushak, N. & Simonson, N. (2001). Instructional technology and attitude change. In D.H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of Research for Educational Communications and Technology (pp. 327-374). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
  • McGrail, E. (2005). Teachers, technology, and change: English teachers' perspectives. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(1), 5-14.
  • Murphy, C. (2006). The impact of ICT on primary science. In P. Warwick, E. Wilson & M. Winterbottom (Eds.), Teaching and Learning Primary Science with ICT (pp. 13-32). Berkshire, England: Open University Press.
  • Murray, L. & Hourigan, T. (2007). Blog writing integration for academic language learning purposes: towards an assessment framework. Iberica, 14, 9-32. Retrieved from
  • O’Dowd, R. (2003). Understanding the ''other side": Intercultural learning in a Spanish-English e-mail exchange. Language Learning & Technology, 7(2), 118-144. Retrieved August 26, 2003, from
  • Plana, M. G. & Ballester, E. P. (2009). Beyond technology in computer assisted language learning: Learners’ experiences. English Language Teaching, 2(4), 3-12.
  • Prensky, M. (2007). Digital Game Based Learning. St. Paul, MN: Paragon House.
  • Reinking, D. (1994). Electronic literacy. Retrieved online from
  • Riasati, M. J., Allahyar, N. & Tan, K.-E. (2012). Technology in language education: Benefits and barriers. Journal of Education and Practice, 3(5), 25-30.
  • Saeedi, Z. (2013). Care with CALL. In D. Tafazoli & S. C. Chirimbu (Eds.), Language & Technology: Computer Assisted Language Learning (pp. 40-47). Tehran, Iran: Khate Sefid Press.
  • Saettler, P. (1990). The Evolution of American Educational Technology. Englewood, CO: Libraries Unlimited.
  • Salaberry, M. R. (2001). The use of technology for second language learning and teaching: A retrospective. The Modern Language Journal, 85 (1), 39-56.
  • Shyamlee, S. D. & Phil, M. (2012). Use of technology in English language teaching and learning: An analysis. Proceedings of the International Conference on Language, Medias and Culture, Singapore, 150-156.
  • Singhal, M. (1997). The internet and foreign language education: Benefits and challenges. The Internet TESL Journal, III (6). Retrieved from
  • Son, J.-B. (2004). Teacher development in e-learning environments. In J.-B. Son (Ed.), Computer-Assisted Language Learning: Concepts, Contexts and Practices (pp. 107-122). Lincoln, NE: iUniverse.
  • Son, J.-B., Robb, T. & Charismiadji, I. (2011). Computer literacy and competency: A survey of Indonesian teachers of English as a foreign language. CALL-EJ, 12(1), 26-42.
  • Song, Y. & Fox, R. (2008) Uses of the PDA for undergraduate students’ incidental vocabulary learning of English. ReCALL, 20(3), 290-314.
  • Stigler, J. & Hiebert, J. (1999). The Teaching Gap. NY, New York: The Free Press.
  • Tafazoli, D., Gómez Parra, M. E. & Huertas Abril, C. A. (2017). Computer literacy: Sine qua non for digital age of language teaching & learning. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 7(9), 716-722.
  • Warschauer, M. (1996). Computer-assisted language learning: An introduction. In S. Fotos (Ed.), Multimedia Language Teaching (pp. 3-20). Tokyo: Logos International.
  • Warschauer, M. (2000). CALL for the 21st Century. Presented paper at the IATEFL and ESADE Conference, July 2000, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Warschauer, M. & Healey, D. (1998). Computers and language learning: An overview. Language Teaching, 31(1), 57-71.
  • Warschauer, M., Knoebel, M. & Stone, L. (2004). Technology and equity in schooling: Deconstructing the digital divide. Educational Policy, 18, 562-588.
  • Warschauer, M., Shetzer, H. & Meloni, C. (2000). Internet for English Teaching. Alexandria, VA: TESOL Publications.
  • Warschauer, M. & Whittaker, P. F. (1997). The Internet for English Teaching: Guidelines for Teachers. The Internet TESL Journal, 3(10). Retrieved from
  • Wenden, A. (1998). Learner Strategies for Learner Autonomy. New York: Prentice Hall.
  • Wood, W. (2000). Attitude change: Persuasion and social influence. Annual Review of Psychology, 51, 539-570.
  • Zimbardo, P. & Leippe, M. (1991). The Psychology of Attitude Change and Social Influence. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.