BURAKOCHWASTY I POŚPIECHY NA PLANTACJACH BURAKA CUKROWEGO

• Authors: Katarzyna Marzec , Ewa Moliszewska , Jacek Piszczek

Title variants

EN

Weed beet and bolters on sugar beet plantations

• Languages of publication: PL EN

Abstracts

EN

Sugar beet is one of the more important crop in Poland. Occurrence of bolting plants as an effect of vernalization was previously known but such plants created seeds very rare. Sugar beet seed plants appeared in nineties of XX when seeds produced in Mediterranean Sea area were introduced to practice in Poland. They are a progeny of hybridization between breeding materials and beet wild species beet. The increase of seed plant number in field is a result of growers’ neglect. Monitoring in north west part of Poland shows that the situation in some fields is critical and number of weed beet is so high that it is almost impossible to sow sugar beet there.

Keywords

EN

SUGAR BEET,; WEED BEET,; BOLTER

• Publisher: Centrum Doradztwa Rolniczego w Brwinowie. Oddział w Poznaniu
• Journal: Zagadnienia Doradztwa Rolniczego
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 1(91)
• Pages: 87-93

Contributors

author

Katarzyna Marzec

author

Ewa Moliszewska

author

Jacek Piszczek

• Jacek Piszczek, Instytut Ochrony Roślin- Państwowy Instytut Badawczy, Terenowa Stacja Doświadczalna, ul. Pigwowa 16, 87-100 Toruń, Poland.

References

• 1. ALS Herbicide-tolerant sugarbeet gets a name. (2016): http://www.kws.com/aw/KWS/company-info/Company/investor-relations/News/News/~gwlt/ALS-Herbicide-tolerant-sugarbeet-gets-a/ [Dostęp: 08.06.2016].
• 2. Johnson R., Burtch L. (1959): The problem of wild annual Sugar beets in California. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 4: 311–317.
• 3. Landova M., Hamouzova J., Soukup J., Jursik M., Holec J., Squire G. (2010): Population density and soil seed bank of weed beet as influence by crop sequence and soil tillage. Plant Siol Enviroment 56(11): 541–549.
• 4. Lasa J., Sanz J. (1975): Bolting variability in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.). Anales Aula Dei 13(3/4): 345–356.
• 5. Loel J., Hoffman C. (2014): Importance of growth stage and weather conditions for the winter hardiness of autumn sown sugar beet. Field Crops Research 162: 70–76.
• 6. Longden P. (1989): Effects of increasing weed-beet density on sugar beet yield and quality. Annales of Applied Biology 114: 527–532.
• 7. Longden P., Clarke N., Thomas T. (1994): Why are bolting and flowering important in sugar beet. British Sugar Beet Review 2: 23–26.
• 8. May M. (2000): Weed beet update (one year seeding - years weeding). British Sugar beet Review 4:15–17.
• 9. McFarlane J. (1975): Naturally occurring hybrids between sugarbeet and Beta macrocarpa in the Imperial Valley of California. Journal of the American Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 18: 245–251.
• 10. Moliszewska E. (2016): Burakochwasty i pośpiechy na plantacjach buraka cukrowego, Burak Cukrowy Lato 2016: 4-6.
• 11. Richards C., Brownson M., Mitchell S., Kresovich S., Panella L. (2004): Polymorphic microsatellite markers for inferring diversity in wild and domesticated sugar beet (Beta vulgarius). Molecular Ecology Notes 4: 243–245.
• 12. Sester M., Dürr C., Darmency H., Colbach N. (2007): Modelling the effects of cropping systems on the seed bank dynamics and the emergence of weed beet.
• 13. Ecological Modelling 204: 47–58.
• 14. Stark C., Liepelt S., Dickvoss M., Bartsch D., Ziegenhagen B., Urlich A. (2006): Fast and simple monitoring of introgressive gene flow from wild beet into sugar beet. Journal of Sugar Beet Research 43(3): 145–154.