The Adaptation of the Motivation to Lead Instrument to the Estonian Military Context

• Authors: Antek Kasemaa
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Purpose: This study is a contribution to the validation of the Motivation to Lead (MTL) scale proposed by Chan and Drasgow (2001) in order to measure three types of motivation to be a leader: affective, social-normative and calculative. This research examines the psychometrical properties of the MTL scale in the Estonian context. Methodology: The sample of 517 military and non-military individuals from the Estonian Defence Forces, Estonian Police and students from Tallinn University participated in the study. The original MTL scale was expanded by with the addition of ideological and patriotic dimensions proposed by Amit and colleagues (2007). The factorial structure of the MTL Scale was analysed by using exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis (respectively N = 170 and N = 347). Findings: The results confirmed that both three- and five-component MTL scales are applicable in the Estonian context; the pool of 35 items was reduced into 25 items with good internal reliability. Moreover, the results showed correlations between leadership self-efficacy and MTL components, and differences between leaders’ and non-leaders’ MTL. The results indicate that the MTL scale can be a reliable and useful instrument to measure leadership motivation in the Estonian military context. Originality: This study is the first to adapt the MTL scale to the Estonian context. In addition, it examines the validity of ideological and patriotic MTL as part of the general MTL construct outside of the Israeli samples.

Keywords

EN

motivation to lead;; leadership self-efficacy;; scale validation

• Publisher: Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego
• Journal: Journal of Management and Business Administration. Central Europe
• Year: 2016
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 64-88

Dates

published

2016-03-15

Contributors

author

Antek Kasemaa

• Tallinn University

References

• Ajzen, I. (1991). The Theory of Planned Behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2): 179–211, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T
• Amit, K., Lisak, A., Popper, M. and Gal, R. (2007). Motivation to Lead: Research on the Motives for Undertaking Leadership Roles in the Israel Defence Forces (IDF). Military Psychology, 19(3): 137–160, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995600701386317
• Amit, K., Popper, M., Gal, R., Mamane-Levy, T. and Lisak, A. (2009). Leadership-shaping experiences: A comparative study of leaders and non-leaders. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 30(4): 302–318, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437730910961658
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The Exercise of Control. New York, NY: Freeman & Company.
• Bass, M.B. and Riggio, E.R. (2006). Transformational Leadership. New Jersey, Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
• Bobbio, A. and Manganelli Rattazzi, A.M. (2006). A Contribution to the Validation of the Motivation to Lead Scale (MTL): A research in the Italian Context. Leadership, 2(1): 117–129, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1742715006057240
• Brown, A.T. (2006). Confirmatory Factor Analysis for Applied Research. New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Byrne, B.M. (1998). Structural Equation Modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic Concepts, applications, and Programming. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Chan, K-Y., Rounds, J. and Drasgow, F. (2000). The Relation between Vocational Interests and the Motivation to Lead. Journal of Vocational Behaviour, 57(2): 226–245, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1728
• Chan, K-Y. and Drasgow, F. (2001). Toward a Theory of Individual Differences and Leadership: Understanding the Motivation to Lead. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(3): 481–498, http://dx.doi.org/10.1006/jvbe.1999.1728
• Chen, G., Gully, S.M. and Eden, D. (2001). Validation of a New General Self-Efficacy Scale, Organizational Research Methods, 4(1): 62–83, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109442810141004
• Clemmons III, A.B. and Fields, D. (2011). Values as Determinants of the Motivation to Lead. Military Psychology, 23(6): 587–600, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08995605.2011.616787
• DeVellis, R.F. (2003). Scale Development: Theory and Applications 2nd ed. California: Sage Publications Inc.
• Fabrigar, R.L., MacCallum, C.R., Wegener, T.D. and Strahan, J.E. (1999). Evaluating the Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research. Psychological Methods, 4(3): 272–299, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.4.3.272
• Feasel, K.E. (1995). Mediating the Relation between Goals and Subjective Well-being: Global and Domain-specific Variants of Self-efficacy. Unpublished Master´s Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, IL.
• Felfe, J. and Schyns, B. (2014). Romance of Leadership and Motivation to Lead. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 29(7): 850–865, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/JMP-03-2012-0076
• Fisbein, M. and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behaviour: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
• Gottfried, A.S., Gottfried, W.A., Reichard, J.R., Guerin, D.W., Oliver, H.P. and Riggio, E.R. (2011).
• Motivational Roots of leadership: A Longitudinal Study from Childhood through Adulthood.The Leadership Quarterly, 22(3): 510–519, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.04.008
• Higgins, E.T. (1998). Promotion and Prevention: Regulatory Focus as a Motivational Principle. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 30: 1–46, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60381-0
• Hong, Y., Catano, V.M. and Liao, H. (2011). Leader Emergence: The Role of Emotional Intelligence and Motivation to Lead. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 32(4): 320–343, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437731111134625
• Hooper, D., Coughlan, J. and Mullen, R.M. (2008). Structural Equation Modelling: Guidelines for Determining Model Fit. Electronic Journal of Business Research Methods, 6(1): 53–60.
• Hu, L. and Bentler, M.P. (1999). Cutoff Criteria for Fit Indexes in Covariance Structure Analysis: Conventional Criteria versus New Alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 6(1): 1–55, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10705519909540118
• Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (2006). LISREL 8.80 for Windows [Computer Software]. Scientific Software International, Inc., Lincolnwood, IL.
• Jöreskog, K.G. and Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8 user´s reference guide. Chicago: Scientific Software International, Inc.
• Judge, T.A., Bono, J.E., Ilies, R and Gerhardt, M.W. (2002). Personality and Leadership: A Qualitative and Quantitative Review. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4): 765–780, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.87.4.765
• Kark, R. and Van Dijk, D. (2007). Motivation to Lead, Motivation to Follow: The Role of the Self-Regulatory Focus in Leadership Process. Academy of Management Review, 32(2), 500–528, http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2007.24351846
• Kelley, K. and Lai, K. (2011). Accuracy in Parameter Estimation for the Root Mean Square Error of Approximation: Sample Size Planning for Narrow Confidence Intervals. Multivariate Behavioural Research, 46(1): 1–32, http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00273171.2011.543027
• Kline, R.B. (2011). Principles and Practice of Structural Equation Modeling (Third Ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
• Knippenberg, van D., Knippenberg, van B., De Cremer, D and Hogg, A.M. (2004). Leadership, Self, and Identity: A Review and Research Agenda. The Leadership Quarterly, 15(6): 825–856, http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.002
• Krishnakumar, S. and Hopkins, K. (2014). The Role of Emotion Perception Ability in Motivation to Lead. Management Research Review, 37(4): 334–347, http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/MRR-07-2012-0161
• McClelland, D.C and Boyatzis, R.E. (1982). Leadership Motive Pattern and Long-Term Success in Management. Journal of Applied Psychology, 67(6): 737–743, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0021-9010.67.6.737
• Morgan, A.G., Leech, L.N., Gloeckner, W.G. and Barrett, C.K. (2012). IBM SPSS for Introductory Statistics: Use and Interpretation (5th Edit.), Taylor & Frances Ltd.
• Noar, M.S. (2003). The Role of Structural Equation Modeling in Scale Development. Structural Equation Modeling, 10(4): 622–647, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15328007SEM1004_8
• Northouse, P.G. (2013). Leadership: Theory and Practice (6th Ed). Los Angeles: SAGE Publication Inc.
• Popper, M., Amit, K., Gal, R., Mishkal-Sinai, M. and Lisak, A. (2004). The Capacity to Lead: Major Psychological Differences between Leaders and Non-leaders. Military Psychology, 16(4): 245–263, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/s15327876mp1604_3
• Schreiber, B.J., Stage, K.F., King, J., Nora, A. and Barlow, A.E. (2006). Reporting Structural Equation Modeling and Confirmatory factor Analysis Results: A Review. Journal of Educational Research, 99(6): 323–337, http://dx.doi.org/10.3200/JOER.99.6.323-338
• Schwartz, S.H. and Bilsky, W. (1990). Toward the Theory of the Universal Content Structure of Values: Extension and Cross-Cultural Replication. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 58(5): 878–891, http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.58.5.878
• Stiehl, S.K., Felfe, J., Elprana, G. and Gatzka, M.B. (2015). The Role of Motivation to Lead for Leadership Training Effectiveness. International Journal of Training and Development, 19(2): 81–97, http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/ijtd.12051
• Streiner, L.D. (2003). Starting at the Beginning: An Introduction to Coefficient Alpha and Internal Consistency. Journal of Personality Assessment, 80(1): 99–103, http://dx.doi.org/10.1207/S15327752JPA8001_18
• Tabachnick, B.G. and Fidell, L.S. (2007). Using Multivariate statistics 5th ed. Pearson Education, Inc.
• Triandis, H.C. (1977). Interpersonal Behaviour. Monterey, CA: Brooks/Cole.
• Waldman, D.A., Galvin, B.M. and Walumbwa, F.O. (2012). The Development of Motivation to Lead and Leader Role Identity. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 20(2): 156–168, http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1548051812457416