Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2025 | 1(186) | 17-30

Article title

Zasadnicze tezy referatów wygłoszonych na konferencji pt. „Regulamin Sejmu w praktyce parlamentarnej” dnia 11 stycznia 2000 r.

Content

Title variants

EN
Main Theses of the Papers Presented at the Conference “The Standing Orders of the Sejm in Parliamentary Practice” on 11 January 2000

Languages of publication

PL EN

Abstracts

EN
The article presents the main theses of the papers presented by Leszek Garlicki, Marcin Kudej, Jerzy Góral and Marek Zubik. The first two speakers referred primarily to the features of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and their place in the Polish legal system. The Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland, adopted as a resolution, express the organisational autonomy of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and, in accordance with the Polish constitutional tradition, remain a uniform, permanent and normative act. The Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland are neither an act of universally binding law nor an act of internal law: they are a special act of a mixed nature. It follows from the Constitution of the Republic of Poland that the Sejm of the Republic of Poland is obliged to enact and maintain its Standing Orders in force as well as to ensure that their scope of regulation corresponds to that specified in Article 112, Article 61(4) and Article 123(2) of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland. In all matters that are excluded from the scope of regulation of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland by virtue of the specific provisions of the Constitution of the Republic of Poland – despite falling, as far as their subject matter is concerned, within the scope of regulation of the Standing Orders – a reference to an Act of Parliament covers only the regulation of specific issues related to the particularities of a given reference, while all other issues may be regulated by the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland. Jerzy Góral and Marek Zubik, on the other hand, focused on the problems related to the structure of the Standing Orders of the Sejm of the Republic of Poland and their specific content, and proposed appropriate amendments.

Year

Issue

Pages

17-30

Physical description

Contributors

  • Prof. dr hab. Krzysztof Wójtowicz Wyższa Szkoła Prawa we Wrocławiu, Polska University of Law in Wrocław, Poland krzysztof.wojtowicz@prawowroclaw.edu.pl, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7897-3011

References

  • Orzeczenie Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 26 stycznia 1993 r., sygn. akt U 10/92, OTK ZU 1993, poz. 2.
  • Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 1 grudnia 1998 r., sygn. akt K 21/98, OTK ZU 1998, nr 7, poz. 116.
  • Wyrok Trybunału Konstytucyjnego z dnia 14 kwietnia 1999 r., sygn. akt K 8/99, OTK ZU 1999, nr 3, poz. 41.
  • Garlicki L., Konstytucja – regulamin Sejmu – ustawa, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2000, nr 2(37).
  • Góral J., Regulamin Sejmu a praktyka, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2000, nr 2(37).
  • Kudej M., Zmiany regulaminu Sejmu na tle Konstytucji RP, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2000, nr 2(37).
  • Sokolewicz W., uwagi do art. 112, [w:] Konstytucja Rzeczypospolitej Polskiej. Komentarz, red. L. Garlicki, t. 1, Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warszawa 1999.
  • Zubik M., O potrzebie uchwalenia nowego regulaminu Sejmu, „Przegląd Sejmowy” 2001, nr 4(45).

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-f8c38318-ad50-4c89-8f3f-1977e9560df2
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.