PL EN


2013 | 21 | 4(123) | 86-109
Article title

What Determines State Capture in Poland?

Content
Title variants
Languages of publication
EN
Abstracts
EN
Purpose: This study examines the determinants of ex-ante state capture in Poland. Methodology: In order to establish the determinants of ex-ante state capture a logistic regression is estimated. Findings: The study shows that in Poland the majority of legal acts were passed with the aim to satisfy the interest of particular groups. Furthermore, the regression analysis shows that the likelihood of state capture increases during the period of higher economic growth and local elections. The likelihood of state capture, however, declines during presidential elections. The results we attribute to different interests of political parties in the period of local and presidential elections. Finally, we fi nd that the state capture increased over the years in Poland. Additionally, we show that the EU accession did not prevent state capture in Poland. In contrast, the fi nancial crisis of 2007 resulted in a wake-up effect and the likelihood of state capture declined in Poland. Research limitations: In the study we employ proxies for state capture, yet we assume that corruption is a widespread phenomenon in Poland. However, due to its nature corruption is very diffi cult to assess and measure. Originality: The study uses a unique dataset on ex-ante state capture that was identifi ed in the legal acts that have been passed in the period 1990–2011 in Poland.
Year
Volume
21
Issue
Pages
86-109
Physical description
Contributors
author
References
  • Alesina, A., Perotti, R. and Tavares, J. (1998). The Political Economy of Fiscal Adjustments. Brookings Paper, 28(1): 197–248.
  • Alesina, A. (2000). The Political Economy of the Budget Surplus in the United States. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14: 3–19.
  • Alwasiak, S., Lewandowska-Kalina, M., Kalina, L., Kowalewski, O., Rybinski, K.I. and Mozdzen, M., (2012). Report on the role of interest groups in in the legislative process. Warsaw: Mediaworksprint.
  • Dallago, B. (1997), The Economic System, Transition and Opportunities for Entrepreneurship. In Entrepreneurship and SMEs in Transition Economies, The Visegrad Conference. Paris: OECD, Paris.
  • Estache, A. and Martimort, D. (1999). Politics, transaction costs, and the design of regulatory institutions. Policy Research Working Paper Series 2073, The World Bank.
  • Frye, T. and Shleifer, A. (1997). The Invisible Hand and the Grabbing Hand. American Economic Review, 87: 354–358.
  • Goetz, K.H. and Zubek R. (2007). Government, Parliament and Lawmaking in Poland. Journal of Legislative Studies, 13(4): 517–538.
  • Guardiancich, I. (2004). Welfare State Retrenchment in Central and Eastern Europe: The Case of Pension Reforms in Poland and Slovenia. Managing Global Transitions, 2(1): 41–64.
  • Hellman, J.S., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2000), Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2444, The World Bank.
  • Hellman, J. and Kaufmann, D. (2001). Confronting the Challenge of State Capture in Transition Countries, Finance and Development, 38(3).
  • Hellman, J., Jones, G. and Kaufmann, D. (2000). Seize the State, Seize the Day: State Capture, Corruption and Influence in Transition, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2444, The World Bank.
  • Hellman, J., Jones, G., Kaufmann, D. and Schankerman, M. (2000). Measuring Governance, Corruption, and State Capture: How Firms and Bureaucrats Shape the Business Environment in Transition Economies, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 2312, The World Bank.
  • Hellman, J. and Schankerman, M. (2000). Intervention, Corruption and Capture. Economics of Transition, 8(3): 545–576.
  • Jasiecki, K. (2007). Regulating Lobbying in Poland: Background, Scope and Expectations, mimeo.
  • Johnson, S., Kaufmann, D. and Shleifer, A. (1998). The Unofficial Economy in Transition, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2: 159–239.
  • Kowalewski, O. and Rybinski, K. (2011). The hidden transformation: the changing role of the state after the collapse of communism in Central and Eastern Europe. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 27(4): 634–657.
  • Martimort, D. (1999). The Life Cycle of Regulatory Agencies: Dynamic Capture and Transaction Costs. Review of Economic Studies, 66(4): 929–947.
  • Rajan, R.G. and Zingales, L. (2003). The Great Reversals: The Politics of Financial Development in the Twentieth Century, Journal of Financial Economics, 69(1): 5–50.
  • Roberts, K. and Tholen, J. (1998). Young Entrepreneurs in East-Central Europe and the Former Soviet Union, IDS Bulletin, 29(3): 59–64.
  • Rogoff, K. (1990). Equilibrium political budget cycles. American Economic Review, 80: 21–36.
  • Rutland, P. (1999) Mission Impossible? The IMF and the Failure. Review of International Studies, 25(5): 183–200.
  • Sachs, J. (1994). Poland’s jump to market economy: Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
  • Scase, R. (2000). Entrepreneurship and Proprietorship in Transition: Policy Implications for the Small- and Medium-size Enterprise Sector. Helsinki: United Nations University World Institute for Development Economics Research.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1999). The Grabbing Hand. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  • Shleifer, A. (1996). Origins of Bad Policies: Control, Corruption, and Confusion. Rivista di Politica Economica, 86(6): 103–124.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1994). Politicians and Firms, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 109(4): 995–1025.
  • Shleifer, A. and Vishny, R. (1993). Corruption. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3): 599–617.
  • Smallbone, D. and Welter, F. (2001). The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies. Small Business Economics, 16: 249–262.
  • Stigler, G. (1971). The Economic Theory of Regulation. Bell Journal of Economics, II: 3–21.
  • Soto de, H. (1989). The Other Path. New York: Basic Books.
  • Zubek, R. (2008). Parties, Rules and Government Legislative Control in Central Europe: the Case of Poland. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 41(2): 147–161.
  • Vachudova, M.A. (2005). Europe Undivided: Democracy, Leverage, and Integration After Communism. Oxford: Oxford University Press
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-f936bb1a-2f97-429c-accb-237e555a3e4e
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.