Militaryzm – ujęcie teoretyczne

• Authors: Olszanecka Natalia
• Languages of publication: PL

Abstracts

EN

While an increasing number of researchers develop an interest in security studies, the problem of militarism is systematically overlooked in scientific publications. In the Polish discourse, this phenomenon is most often identified with ideology or the military build-ups. However, these are not the only existing theoretical approaches of the militarism phenomenon. This article aims to fill a certain gap in theoretical considerations on this subject and to present the most important theoretical perspectives of militarism and also its typology. The main research problem is to find an answer to the question: how is militarism understood today?

Keywords

PL

militaryzm; ideologia; wyścig zbrojeń

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu. Wydawnictwo UMK
• Journal: Historia i Polityka
• Year: 2018
• Issue: 25 (32)
• Pages: 39-50

Contributors

author

Olszanecka Natalia

• Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika, Wydział Politologii i Studiów Międzynarodowych, Toruń

References

• Bäcker, R. (2010). Autorytaryzm. Historia i Polityka, 2/3 (s. 21–25). DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/HiP.2010.002.
• Burak, B. (2011). The Anatomy of Militarism and an Overview of Civil-Military Relations. Pobrane z: https://thegwpost.com/2011/10/20/the-anatomy-of-militarism-and-an-overview-of-civil-military-relations/.
• Chalmers, J. (2004). The Sorrows of Empire: Militarism, Secrecy, and the End of the Republic. New York: Metropolitan Books.
• Heidelberg Institute for International Conflict Research. (2016). Conflict Barometer. Heidelberg: HIIK.
• Klare, M. (1978). Militarism: The Issues Today. Bulletin of Peace Proposals, 9(2), 121–128.
• Mabee, B., Vucetic, S. (2017). Varieties of Militarism: Towards a Typology. Pobrane z: osf.io/preprints/socarxiv/ezdqr.
• Mann, M. (1996). Authoritarian and Liberal Militarism: A Contribution from Comparative and Historical Sociology. W: S. Smith, K. Booth, M. Zalewski (red.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (s. 221–239). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Mann, M. (2003). Incoherent Empire. London: Verso.
• Mutschler, M.M. (2017). Global Militarization Index 2017. Bonn: Bonn International Center for Conversion.
• Olszanecka, N. (2018). Armia jako grupa interesu, problem stosunków cywilno-wojskowych. Athenaeum. Polskie Studia Politologiczne, 57, 170–181. DOI: 10.15804/athena.2018.57.10.
• Shaw, M. (2011). Twenty-First Century Militarism: A Historical-Sociological Framework. Pobrane z: https://historicalsociology.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/shaw-twenty-first-century-militarism-a-historical-sociological-framework.pdf.
• SIPRI. (2016). Military Expenditure by Region in Constant US Dollars, 1988–1996. Pobrane z: https://www.sipri.org/sites/default/files/Milex-regional-totals.pdf.
• Skopin, W. (1959). Militaryzm. Warszawa: Wyd. MON.
• Stavrianakis, A., Selby, J. (red.). (2013). Militarism and International Relations: Political Economy, Security and Theory. London: Routledge.
• Tanter, R. (1991). Intelligence Agencies and Third World Militarization: A Case Study of Indonesia, 1966–1989, with Special Reference to South Korea, 1961–1989. Pobrane z: http://nautilus.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/12/Revised-opening-3.pdf.
• Vagts, A. (1937). A History of Militarism: Romance and Reality of a Profession. New York: W.W. Norton & Co.
• Wittner, L. (2016). Militarism Run Amok: Russians and Americans Get Their Kids Ready for War. Pobrane z: https://www.huffingtonpost.com/lawrence-wittner/militarism-run-amok-russians-and-americans-get-their-kids-ready-for-war_b_8062364.html.

Identifiers

DOI

10.12775/HiP.2018.021