Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2019 | 14 | 167-176

Article title

Photogrammetric documentation of archaeological artefacts: The current state of the art and future prospects

Content

Title variants

Languages of publication

EN

Abstracts

EN
Photogrammetry has been a part of the curriculum of archaeologists since the early days of photography. This method of obtaining reliable information from non-contact imaging for the purpose of recording, measuring, analyzing and representation of archaeological artefacts is, due to recent advances in imaging techniques and computer technology, going through a renaissance. The history of the method in general terms is discussed in this paper. The authors present new perspectives on current areas of research, including workflows, the use of different hardware and software, and “guerrilla photogrammetry”. Furthermore, the authors propose future directions for the development of the field, like using Smartphones, immersive images, truly virtual museums, and public engagement.

Journal

Year

Volume

14

Pages

167-176

Physical description

Contributors

  • Departament Dziedzictwa Kulturowego Za Granicą i Strat Wojennych, Ministerstwo Kultury i Dziedzictwa Narodowego
  • Instytut Archeologii, Uniwersytet Kardynała Stefana Wyszyńskiego

References

  • Abate D., David M. 2015. Out of Archaeologist’s desk drawer: communicating archaeological data online. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 08.2015, 1-7.
  • Adamia A., Ballettib C., Fassi F., Fregonese L., Guerra F., Taffurelli L., Vernier P. 2015. The Bust of Francesco II Gonzaga: from digital documentation to 3D printing. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 08.2015, 9-15.
  • Albarelli A., Rodolà E., Torsello A. 2010. Robust Camera Calibration using Inaccurate Targets. In: F. Labrosse, R. Zwiggelaar, Y. Liu, B. Tiddeman (eds.), Proceedings of the British Machine Vision Conference. Durham: BMVA Press, 16.1-16.10.
  • Albertz J., A. Wiedemann. 1996. From Analogue To Digital Close-Range Photogrammetry. In: O. Altan, L. Gründig (eds.), Proceedings of the First Turkish-German Joint Geodetic Days, Istanbul, Turkey, September 27-29, 1995. Istambuł, 245-253.
  • Alsadik B., Gerke M., Vosselman G. 2014. Minimal Camera Networks for 3D Image Based Modeling of Cultural Heritage Objects. Sensors 14, 5785-5804.
  • Alsadik B., Gerke M., Vosselman G. 2015. Efficient use of video for 3D modelling of cultural heritage. ISPRS Annals of Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 03.2015, 1-8.
  • Angell I.O., Main P.L. 1982. A Construction of Three-Dimensional Views from the Silhouette Data of Pottery. In: S. Laflin (eds.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1982. Conference Proceedings. Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 117-127.
  • Astorqui, A. 1999. Studying the Archaeological Record from Photogrammetry. In: J. A. Barceló, I. Briz, A. Vila (eds.), New Techniques for Old Times. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1998. Proceedings of the 26th Conference, Barcelona. Oxford: Archaeopress, 77-80.
  • Bakuła, K., Flaśiński A. 2013. Capabilities of a Smartphone for georeferenced 3D model creation: an evaluation. In: Conference Proceedings of 13th International Multidisciplinary Scientific Geoconference SGEM 2013, Albena, Bulgaria. Sofia: SGEM, 85-92.
  • Balletti, C., Guerra, F., Tsioukas V., Vernier P. 2014. Calibration of Action Cameras for Photogrammetric Purposes. Sensors 14, 17471-17490.
  • Biek, L. 1986. Comparology and Stereovideo. In: E. Webb (eds.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985. Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. Institute of Archaeology. London: University of London, 1-35.
  • Boochs, F., Eckhardt S., Fischer B. 2016. A PC-Based Stereoscopic Measurement System for the Generation of Digital Object Models. In: G. Burenhult, J. Arvidsson (eds.), Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Gotland, April 2001. BAR International Series 1016. Oxford: Archaeopress, 371-378.
  • Bonacchi C., Bevan A., Keinan-Schoonbaert A., Pett D., Wexler J. 2014. Crowd-sourced Archaeological Research: The MicroPasts Project. Archaeology International 17, 61-68.
  • Brewster, D. 1856. The Stereoscope. Its history, theory and construction with it’s application to the fine and useful arts and education. London: J. Murray.
  • Campana. S. 2014. 3D modelling in archaeology and cultural heritage – theory and best practice. In: S. Campana, F. Remondino (eds.), 3D Recording and Modelling in Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Theory and best practices. Oxford: British Archaeological Reports, 7-12.
  • Carboni N., Bruseker. G., Guillem A., Bellido Castañeda D., Coughenour C., Domajnko M., de Kramer M., Ramos Calles. M.M., Stathopoulou E.K., Suma R. 2016. Data Provenance in Photogrammetry trough documentation protocols. ISPRS Annals of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 06.2016, 57-64.
  • Chamberlain M.P., Haigh, J.B.G. 1982. A Microcomputer System for Practical Photogrammetry. In: S. Laflin (eds.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1982. Conference Proceedings. Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 142-149.
  • Cignoni, P., Callieri, M., Corsini, M., Dellepiane, M., Ganovelli, F., Ranzuglia, G. 2008. MeshLab: an Open-Source Mesh Processing Tool. In: V. Scarano, R. De Chiara, U. Erra (eds.), Sixth Eurographics Italian Chapter conference: Salerno, Italy, July 2nd–4th, 2008. Aire-la-Ville: Eurographics Association, 129-136.
  • Costa, E., Balletti C., Beltrame C., Guerra F., Vernier P. 2016. Digital Survey techniques for the Documentation of wooden Shipwrecks. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLI-B5, 237- 242.
  • Darrah W. C. 1977. The World of Stereographs. Gettysburg, PA: Land Yacht Press.
  • Duffy S. M. 2013. Multi-light Imaging for Heritage Applications. Swindon: English Heritage Publishing.
  • Eiteljorg H. 1999. Archiving Archaeological Data. In: L. Dingwall, S. Exon, V. Gaffney, S. Laflin, M. van Leusen (eds.), Archaeology in the Age of the Internet. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 25th Anniversary Conference, University of Birmingham, April 1997 (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 750). Oxford: Archaeopress, 117-120.
  • Evin A., Souter T., Hulme-Beaman A., Ameen C., Allen R., Viacava P., Larson G., Cucchi T., Dobney K. 2016. The use of close-range photogrammetry in zooarchaeology: Creating accurate 3D models of wolf crania to study dog domestication. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 9, 87-93.
  • Faigenbaum S., Sober B., Shaus A., Moinester M., Piasetzky E., Bearman G., Cordonsky M., Finkelstein I. 2012. Multispectral images of ostraca: acquisition and analysis. Journal of Archaeological Science 39, 3581-3590.
  • Falkingham P. L. 2012. Acquisition of high resolution 3D models using free, open-source, photogrammetric software. Palaeontologia Electronica 15.1, 1T:15p. palaeo-electronica. org/content/93-issue-1-2012-technical-articles/92-3dphotogrammetry (dostęp: 20.08.2019).
  • Gianolio S., Mermati F., Genovese G. 2014. Image-based 3D modeling for the knowledge and the representation of archaeological dig and pottery: Sant’Omobono and Sarno project’s strategies. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XL-5, 243-250.
  • Gordon S. 1991. How Safe Is Your Data? In: S. Rahtz, K. Lockyear (eds.), Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology 1990 (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 565). Oxford: Tempus Reparatum, 74-79.
  • Guidi G. 2014. Acquisition and modelling in Cultural Heritage: Evolution and Perspectives. Talk presented at Indiana University, Bloomington (IN) USA, 21.11.2014.
  • Guidi G., Gonizzi Barsanti S., Loredana Micoli L., Russo M. 2015. Massive 3D Digitization of Museum Contents. In: L. Toniolo, M. Boriani, G. Guidi (eds.), Built Heritage: Monitoring Conservation Management. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 335-346.
  • Van Haaften J. 1980. Egypt and the Holy Land in Historic Photographs: Seventy-seven Views by Francis Frith. Dover: Dover Publications.
  • Hall N. S., Laflin S. 1984. A Computer Aided Design Technique for Pottery Profiles. In: S. Laflin (ed.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1984. Conference Proceedings. Centre for Computing and Computer Science. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 178-188.
  • Hannavy J. 2008. Encyclopaedia of Nineteenth Century Photography. New York: Routledge.
  • Happa J., Mudge M., Debattista K., Artusi A., Gonçalves A., Chalmers A. 2009. Illuminating the Past – State of the Art, The 10th International Symposium on Virtual Reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage. Virtual Reality 14.3, 155-182.
  • Hassett B. R., Lewis-Bale T. 2016. Comparison of 3D Landmark and 3D Dense Cloud Approaches to Hominin Mandible Morphometrics Using Structure‐From‐Motion. Archeometry 59.1, 191-203.
  • Hameeuw H. 2015. 3D via the Multilight Photometric Stereo Approach: the Portable Light Dome solution. Talk presented at Beyond 3D Digitisation: Applications of 3D Technology in Cultural Heritage Royal Museums of Art and History, 12-13.03.2015.
  • Hermon S., Pilides D., Iannone G., Georgiou R., Amico N., Ronzino P. 2012. Ancient Vase 3D Reconstruction and 3D Visualization. In: M. Zhou, I. Romanowska, Z. Wu, P. Xu, P. Verhagen (eds.), Revive the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 39th International Conference, Beijing, April 12-16.2011. Amsterdam: Pallas Publications, 59-64.
  • Hörr C., Lindinger E., Brunnett G. 2011. Considerations on Technical Sketch Generation from 3D Scanned Cultural Heritage. In: E. Jerem, F. Redő, V. Szeverényi (eds.), On the Road to Reconstructing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2-6, 2008. Budapest: Archeaeolingua, 258-267.
  • Joannidis C., Verykokou S., Kontogianni G. 2014. 3D Visualization via Augmented Reality: The Case of the Middle Stoa in the Ancient Agora of Athens. In: M. Ioannides, N. Magnenat-Thalmann, E. Fink, R. Žarnić, A.Y. Yen, E. Quak (eds.), Digital Heritage. Progress in Cultural Heritage: Documentation, Preservation, and Protection. EuroMed 2014 (= Lecture Notes in Computer Science 8740). Cham: Springer International Publishing, 279-289.
  • Kadambi A., Taamazyan V., Shi B., Raskar R. 2015. Polarized 3D: High-Quality Depth Sensing with Polarization Cues. In: ICCV ‘15 Proceedings of the 2015 IEEE International Conference on Computer Vision (ICCV). Washington: IEEE Computer Society, 3370-3378.
  • Kampel M., Sablatnig R., Mara H., Lettner M. 2007. 3D Acquisition of Archaeological Ceramics and Web-based 3D Data Storage. In: J.T. Clark, E.M. Hagemeister (eds.), Digital Discovery. Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 549-553.
  • Kampffmeyer U. 1986. ARCOS – A Video-Computer-Documentation System for the Use in Archaeology and Historic Sciences. In: S. Laflin (ed.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1986. Conference Proceedings. Centre for Computing and Computer Science, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 91-147.
  • Karasik A., Mara H., Sablatnig R., Sharon I., Smilansky U. 2007. Measuring Deformations of Wheel-Produced Ceramics Using High Resolution 3D Reconstructions. In: A. Figueiredo, G. Leite Velho (eds.), The world is in your eyes. CAA 2005. Computer Applications and uantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 33rd Conference, Tomar, March 2005. Tomar: CAA Portugal, 11-14.
  • Khorasaninejad M., Ting Chen W., Devlin R. C., Oh J., Zhu A.Y., Capasso F. 2016. Metalenses at visible wavelengths: Diffraction-limited focusing and subwavelength resolution imaging. Science 352 (6290), 1190-1194.
  • Kimball J.J.K. 2016. 3D Delineation: A modernisation of drawing methodology for field archaeology. Oxford: Archaeopress.
  • Koller D. 2011. Protected Sharing of 3D models of Cultural Heritage and Archaeological Artifacts. In: E. Jerem, F. Redő, V. Szeverényi (eds.), On the Road to Reconstructing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2-6, 2008. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 384-389.
  • Konecny G. 2014. Geoinformation: Remote Sensing, Photogrammetry and Geographic Information Systems. London: CRC Press.
  • Kozan J.M., Kozan, I.B. 2007. White Water Shaker Village: Exploring Historical Photographs as Data Sources for Virtual Reconstructions. In: J.T. Clark, E.M. Hagemeister (eds.), Digital Discovery. Exploring New Frontiers in Human Heritage. CAA2006. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 34th Conference, Fargo, United States, April 2006. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 573-578.
  • Lambers K., Remondino, F. 2008. Optical 3D Measurement Techniques in Archaeology: Recent Developments and Applications. In: A. Posluschny, K. Lambers, I. Herzog (eds.), Layers of Perception. Proceedings of the 35th International Conference on Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA), Berlin, Germany, April 2–6, 2007. Kolloquien zur Vor- und Frühgeschichte, vol. 10. Bonn: Dr. Rudolf Habelt GmbH, 27-35.
  • Lewis A., Ch’ng E. 2012. A Photogrammetric Analysis of Cuneiform Tablets for the Purpose of Digital Reconstruction. Progress in Cultural Heritage Preservation 1.1, 49-53.
  • Lopez-Romero E. 2014. Out of the box: exploring the 3D modelling potential of ancient image archives. Virtual Archaeology Review 5.10, 107-116.
  • Lowell R. 1999. Matters of Light and Depth. New York: Lower Light Management.
  • Lux J.A., Jarzombek M. 2001. Artistic Secrets of the Kodak. Thresholds 22, 60-63.
  • Malzbender T., Gelb D., Wolters H. 2001. Polynomial Texture Maps. In: L. Pocock (ed.), SIGGRAPH 2001, Proceedings of the 28th annual conference on Computer graphics and interactive techniques. New York: ACM New York, 519-528.
  • Mostern R., Arksey M. 2016. Don’t Just Build It, They Probably Won’t Come: Data Sharing and the Social Life of Data in the Historical Quantitative Social Sciences. International Journal of Humanities and Arts Computing 10.2, 205-224.
  • Mudge M., Malzbender T., Chalmers A., Scopigno R., Davis J., Wang O., Gunawardane P., Ashley M., Doerr M., Proenca A., Barbosa J. 2008. Image-Based Empirical Information Acquisition, Scientific Reliability, and Long-Term Digital Preservation for the Natural Sciences and Cultural Heritage. In: M. Roussou and J. Leigh (eds.), Eurographics 2008, The Eurographics Association.
  • Mudge M., Schroer C., Earl G., Martinez K., Pagi H., Toler-Franklin C., Rusinkiewicz S., Palma G., Wachowiak M., Ashley M., Matthews N., Noble T., Dellepiane M. 2010. Principles and Practices of Robust, Photography-based Digital Imaging Techniques for Museums. In: A. Artusi, M. Joly-Parvex,G. Lucet, A. Ribes, and D. Pitzalis (eds.), The 11th International Symposium on Virtual reality, Archaeology and Cultural Heritage VAST – Short and Project Paper Proceeding. Paris: Eurographics Association, 111-137.
  • Nickel D.R. 2004. Francis Frith in Egypt and Palestine: A Victorian Photographer Abroad. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  • Nicolae C., Bozgan M., Amarie M. 2014. 3D Digitization of Bronze and Gold artefacts from Romanian National History Museum’s Collections. Talk presented at ISPRS Technical Commision V Symposium – Romanian National History Museum, Bucharest.
  • Pamarta A., Guillonb O., Faracic S., Gatteta E., Genevoisd M., Valletb J. M., De Lucaa L. 2017. Multispectral Photogrammetric Data Acquisition And Processing For Wall Paintings Studies. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences XLII-2/W3, 559-566.
  • Payne A., Cole K., Simon K., Goodmaster C., Limp F. 2010. Designing the Next Generation Virtual Museum: Making 3D Artifacts Available for Viewing and Download. In: B. Frischer, J. Webb Crawford, D. Koller (eds.), Making History Interactive. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22-26. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series S2079). Oxford: Archaeopress, 292-297.
  • Pomaska G. 2002. Desktop – Photogrammetry and Its Link to Web Publishing. In: G. Burenhult, J. Arvidsson (eds.), Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope. CAA2001. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Gotland, April 2001. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1016). Oxford: Archaeopress, 301-308.
  • Porter S.T., Missal K., Pawłowicz L. 2016. A Comparison of Methods for creating 3D models of obsidian artifacts. Niepublikowany referat wygłoszony podczas konferencji Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA) 2016 w Oslo. http://www.stporter.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/04/A_Comparison_of_Methods_for_Creating_3D.pdf (dostęp: 20.08.2019)
  • Porter S.T., Huberb N., Hoyerb C., Flossb H. 2016. Portable and low-cost solutions to the imaging of Paleolithic art objects: A comparison of photogrammetry and reflectance transformation imaging. Journal of Archaeological Science: Reports 10, 859–863.
  • Porter S.T., Roussel M., Soressi M. 2016. A Simple Photogrammetry Rig for the Reliable Creation of 3D Artifact Models in the Field. Lithic Examples from the Early Upper Paleolithic Sequence of Les Cottés (France). Advances in Archaeological Practice 4.1, 71–86.
  • Remondino F., Fraser C. 2006. Digital camera calibration methods: Considerations and comparisons. The International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences V.WG V/1, 266-272.
  • Remondino F., El-Hakim S.F., Gruen A., Zhang L. 2008. Turning Images into 3-D Models: Developments and performance analysis of image matching for detailed surface reconstruction of heritage objects. IEEE Signal Processing Magazine 25.4, 55-65.
  • Remondino F. 2011. Heritage Recording and 3D Modeling with Photogrammetry and 3D Scanning. Remote Sensing 3, 1104–1138.
  • Remondino F., Del Pizzo S., Kersten T., Troisi S. 2012. Lowcost and open-source solutions for automated image orientation – a critical overview. Progress in cultural heritage preservation 7616, 40-54.
  • Resco P.A., Barrero J.D.C., Díaz M.F., Serrano P.M.M. 2014. “Fotogrametría Involuntaria”: rescatando información geométrica en 3D de fotografías de archivo. Virtual Archaeology Review 5.10, 11-20.
  • Richards J. 1986. Into the Black Art: Achieving Computer Literacy in Archaeology. In: E. Webb (ed.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985. Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. London: University of London, 121-125.
  • Rizzi A., Voltolini F., Girardi S., Gonzo L., Remondino F. 2007. Digital preservation, documentation and analysis of paintings, monuments and large cultural heritage with infrared technology, digital cameras and range sensors. International Archives of the Photogrammetry, Remote Sensing and Spatial Information Sciences 36, 631-636.
  • Simon C., Schütze R., Boochs F., Marzani F.S. 2012. Asserting the precise position of 3D and multispectral acquisition systems for multisensor registration applied to cultural heritage analysis. In: K. Schoeffmann, B. Merialdo, A.G. Hauptmann, C.W. Ngo, Y. Andreopoulos, C. Breiteneder (eds.), Advances in multimedia modelling. MMM 2012. Lecture Notes in Computer Science 7131. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 597-608.
  • Scollar I., Huang T.S., Weidner B., Tang G. 1977. An installation for interactive transfer of information from oblique air photos to maps. In: S. Laflin (ed.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1977. Proceedings of the Annual Conference organised at the Computer Centre, University of Birmingham. Birmingham: University of Birmingham, 105-118.
  • Shinoto M., Böröcz Z., Thomas C., Dirksen D., Maran J., von Bally G. 2002. Topometrical measurements in Tiryns, Greece. report on a co-operate project between Physics and Archaeology. In: G. Burenhult, J. Arvidsson (eds.), Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope. CAA2001. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Gotland, April 2001. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1016). Oxford: Archaeopress, 181-190.
  • Schenk T. 2005. Introduction to Photogrammetry. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering and Geodetic Science The Ohio State University. Columbus: The Ohio State University.
  • Tsioukas V., Patias P., Jacobs P., A Novel System for the 3D Reconstruction of Small Objects. In: F. Nicolucci, S. Hermon (eds.), Beyond the Artifact. Digital Interpretation of the Past. Proceedings of CAA2004, Prato 13–17 April 2004. Budapest: Archaeolingua, 388-391.
  • Walczak K., Cellary W., Prinke A. 2010. Interactive Presentation of Archaeological Objects Using Virtual and Augmented Reality. In: E. Jerem, F. Redő, V. Szeverényi (eds.), On the Road to Reconstructing the Past. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 36th International Conference. Budapest, April 2-6, 2008. Budapest: Archeaeolingua, 406-412.
  • Wilcock J.D. A General Survey of Computer Applications in Archaeology. Archaeology and Science 9, 17-21.
  • Wilcock J., Coombes T. 1986. Some Further Developments in Hardware and Software for the Automatic Capture of Artefact Shapes by Television Camera. In: E. Webb (ed.), Computer Applications in Archaeology 1985. Proceedings of the Conference on Quantitative Methods, Institute of Archaeology, London, March 29-30, 1985. London: University of London, 145-151.
  • Wheatstone C. 1838. Contributions to the Physiology of Vision. Part the First. On some remarkable, and hitherto unobserved, Phenomena of Binocular Vision. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London 128, 371-394.
  • Velios A., Harrison J. P. 2002. Capturing 3-D Archaeological Objects: a Comparison of Quality and Practicality. In: G. Burenhult, J. Arvidsson (eds.), Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope. CAA2001. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Gotland, April 2001. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1016). Oxford: Archaeopress, 567-574.
  • Zhou M., Geng G., Wu Z., Shui W. 2010. A Virtual Restoration System for Broken Pottery. In: B. Frischer, J. Webb Crawford, D. Koller (eds.), Making History Interactive. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology (CAA). Proceedings of the 37th International Conference, Williamsburg, Virginia, United States of America, March 22-26. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series S2079). Oxford: Archaeopress, 391-396.
  • Zhukovsky M. 2002. Handling Digital 3-D Record of Archaeological Excavation Data. In: G. Burenhult, J. Arvidsson (eds.), Archaeological Informatics: Pushing The Envelope. CAA2001. Computer Applications and Quantitative Methods in Archaeology. Proceedings of the 29th Conference, Gotland, April 2001. (= British Archaeological Reports. International Series 1016). Oxford: Archaeopress, 431-440.
  • CIPAA. 2017. Global market report. http://www.cipa.jp/stats/report_e.html
  • Levoy M. Lectures on Digital Photography, on-line free photography course. https://sites.google.com/site/marclevoylectures/home

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-fa0cd56a-457f-4df5-a2ba-c6a6f1cbc56c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.