Journal

Article title

Title variants

Languages of publication

Abstracts

Keywords

Publisher

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

48–62

Physical description

Dates

published

2015-09-30

Contributors

author

- Educational Research Institute

author

- Educational Research Institute

author

- Educational Research Institute

author

- Educational Research Institute

References

- Angoff, W. A. and Schrader, W. B. (1981). A study of alternative methods for equating rights scores to formula scores (ETS RR-81-8). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
- Arnett, J. (1992). Reckless behavior in adolescence: a developmental perspective. Developmental Review, 12, 339–373.
- Ben-Shakhar, G. and Sinai, Y. (1991). Gender differences in multiple-choice tests: the role of differential guessing tendencies. Journal of Educational Measurement, 28(1), 23–25.
- Bielinski, J. and Davison, M. L. (2001). A sex difference by item difficulty interaction in multiple-choice mathematics items administered to national probability samples. Journal of Educational Measurement, 38(1), 51–77.
- Birnbaum, A. (1968). Some latent trait models and their use in inferring an examinee’s ability. In F. M. Lord and M. R. Novick (eds.), Statistical theories of mental test scores (pp. 17–20). Reading: Addison-Wesley.
- Boughton, K. A. and Yamamoto, K. (2007). A hybrid model for test speededness. In M. von Davier and C. H. Carstensen (eds.), Multivariate and mixture distribution Rasch models (pp. 147–156). New York: Springer.
- Byrnes, J. P. (1998). The nature and development of decision-making: a self-regulation model. Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Byrnes, J. P., Miller, D. C. and Schafer, W. D. (1999). Gender differences in risk taking: a meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 125(3), 367–383.
- Cohen, J. (1992). A power primer. Psychological Bulletin, 112(1), 155–159.
- Coombs, C. H., and Lehner, P. E. (1981). Evaluation of two alternative models of a theory of risk: I. Are moments of distributions useful in assessing risk? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7(1), 1110–1123.
- DeMars, C. E., Bashkov, B. M. and Socha, A. B. (2013). The role of gender in test-taking motivation under low-stakes conditions. Research & Practice in Assessment, 8(2), 69–82.
- Finch, W. H. and French, B. F. (2014). The impact of group pseudo-guessing parameter differences on the detection of uniform and nonuniform DIF. Psychological Test and Assessment Modeling, 56(1), 25–44.
- Hambleton, R. K., Swaminathan, H. and Rogers, H. J. (1991). Fundamentals of item response theory. Newbury Park: Sage.
- Han, K. T. (2012). Fixing the c parameter in the three-parameter logistic model. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 17(1), 1–24.
- Hilbe, J. M. (2011). Negative binomial regression (2nd ed.). Cambridge–New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Holland, P. W. (1990). The Dutch identity: a new tool for the study of item response models. Psychometrika, 55(1), 5–18.
- Kahneman, D., and Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
- Kelling, G. W., Zirkes, R. and Myerowitz, D. (1976). Risk as value: a switch of set hypothesis. Psychological Reports, 38, 655–658.
- Kolen, M. (1981). Comparison of traditional and item response theory methods for equating tests. Journal of Educational Measurement, 18(1), 1–11.
- Long, J. S. (2001). Regression models for categorical dependent variables using Stata. College Station: Stata Press.
- Lopes, L. L. (1987). Between hope and fear: the psychology of risk. In L. Berkowitz (ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (vol. 20, pp. 255–295). New York: Academic Press.
- Lord, F. M. (1974). Estimation of latent ability and item parameters when there are omitted responses. Psychometrika, 39(2), 247–264.
- Lord, F. M. (1975). Evaluation with artificial data of a procedure for estimating ability and item characteristic curve parameters. (Research Bulletin RB-75-33). Princeton: Educational Testing Service.
- Lord, F. M. (1980). Applications of item response theory to practical testing problems. London Routledge.
- Maris, G. and Bechger, T. (2009). On interpreting the model parameters for the three parameter logistic model. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 7(2), 75–88.
- Meijer, R. R. (guest ed.). (1996a). Person fit research: theory and applications. Applied Measurement In Education [Special Issue], 9(1).
- Meijer, R. R. (1996b). Person-fit research: an introduction. Applied Measurement in Education, 9(1), 3–8.
- Pekkarinen, T. (2014). Gender differences in strategic behaviour under competitive pressure: evidence on omission patterns in university entrance examinations. IZA Discussion Paper No. 8018. Retrieved from http://ftp.iza.org/dp8018.pdf
- Penner, A. (2003). International gender X item difficulty interactions in mathematics and science achievement tests. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(3), 650–655.
- Rao, C. R. (1973). Linear statistical inference and its applications (2nd ed). New York: John Wiley and Sons.
- San Martin, E. Pino, G. del and De Boeck, P. (2006). IRT models for ability-based guessing. Applied Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 183–203.
- Slakter, M. J. (1967). Risk taking on objective examinations. American Educational Research Journal, 4(1), 31–43.
- Slakter, M. J. (1968a). The effect of guessing strategy on objective test scores. Journal of Educational Measurment, 5(3), 217–221.
- Slakter, M. J. (1968b). The penalty for not guessing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 5(3), 141–144.
- Slakter, M. J., Koehler, R. A., Hampton, S. H. and Grennell, R. L. (1971). Sex, grade level, and risk taking on objective examinations. The Journal of Experimental Educational, 39(3), 65–68.
- Swineford, F. (1941). Analysis of a personality trait. Journal of Educational Psychology, 32(6), 438–444.
- Teresi, J. A., Ocepek-Welikson, K., Kleinman, M., Cook, K. F., Crane, P. K., Gibbons, L. E., Morales, L. S., Orlando-Edelen, M. and Cell, D. (2007). Evaluating measurement equivalence using the item response theory log-likelihood ratio (IRTLR) method to assess differential item functioning (DIF): applications (with illustrations) to measures of physical functioning ability and general distress. Quality of Life Research, 16(Supplement 1), 43–68.
- Thissen, D. (2001). IRTLRDIF v2.0b: software for the computation of the statistics involved in item response theory likelihood-ratio tests for differential item functioning. 2.0b ed. Chapel Hill: L.L. Thurstone Psychometric Laboratory, University of North Carolina.
- Thissen, D., Steinber, L. and Wainer, H. (1988). Use of item response theory in the study of group difference in trace lines. In H. Wainer and H. Braun (eds.), Test Validity (pp. 147–170). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
- Von Schrader, S. and Ansley, T. (2006). Sex differences in the tendency to omit items on multiple-choice tests: 1980–2000. Applied Measurement in Education, 19(1), 41–65.
- Wald, A. (1943). Tests of statistical hypothesis concerning several parameters when the number of observations is large. Transactions of the American Mathematical Society, 54, 426–482.
- Wilson, M. and Daly, M. (1985), Competitiveness, risk taking and violence: the young male syndrome, Ethology and Sociology, 6(1), 59–73.
- Zhu, D. and Thompson, T. D. (1995). Gender and ethnic differences in tendencies to omit responses on multiple-choice tests using number-right scoring. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 382 689). Retrieved from http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED382689.pdf
- Ziller, R. C. (1957a). A measure of gambling response-set in objective tests. Psychometrika, 22(3), 289–292.
- Ziller, R. C. (1957b). Vocational choice and utility for risk. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 4(1), 61–64.
- Zuckerman, M. (1991). Psychobiology of personality. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Notes

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2015/3-3-swist-i-in-sex-differences.pdf

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN

0239-6858

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-fb0d6989-4e16-4935-bcab-6b3ca38552f0