PL EN


2016 | 6(954) | 111-129
Article title

Badania naukowe w zarządzaniu strategicznym - refleksje nad wielowymiarowością konstruktów, pluralizmem metod i badaniami wielopoziomowymi

Title variants
EN
Research in Strategic Management – Reflections on Multidimensional Constructs, Mixed Methods Research and Multi-level Research
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
Celem artykułu jest pogłębienie wiedzy w zakresie kierunków rozwoju metodyki badań w zarządzaniu strategicznym. Osiągnięcie celu umożliwiły ekstensywne studia literatury i badań w renomowanych czasopismach (głównie: „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, „Organisational Research Methods”, „Business Research Quarterly”, „Academy of Management Journal”, „Strategic Organization”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Strategic Management Journal”, „Journal of Management”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Organization” oraz innych zawierających wysoce referencyjne opracowania z danej dziedziny), podejmujących problematykę metod badawczych w teorii zarządzania, a w szczególności w obszarze zarządzania strategicznego, w latach 2010–2016. Pierwsza część artykułu przedstawia w sposób ogólny problematykę (ograniczenia i wyzwania) prowadzenia badań w zarządzaniu strategicznym. Następnie omówiono zagadnienia związane z konceptualizacją konstruktów (w tym konstruktów wielowymiarowych). Kolejne punkty dotyczą mixed methods research i badań wielopoziomowych. W końcowej części artykułu sformułowano wnioski i rekomendacje dotyczące prowadzenia badań naukowych w zarządzaniu strategicznym.
EN
The aim of the article is to extend knowledge on the directions of developing research methodology in strategic management. That aim is realised through extensive study of the literature, mainly in the following foreign journals: „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, „Organisational Research Methods”, „Business Research Quarterly”, „Academy of Management Journal”, „Strategic Organization”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Strategic Management Journal”, „Journal of Management”, „Academy of Management Review”, „Organization”. Each of these journals dealt in some capacity with the problems of research methods in management science (including strategic management) in the years 2010–2016. The paper has five parts. The first presents general aspects of conducting research in strategic management, including the limitations and challenges. The issues connected with conceptualising constructs, especially multidimensional ones, are highlighted in the second part. The next two sections examine mixed methods research and the multi-level approach. The final section offers conclusions and recommendations on conducting research in strategic management.
Contributors
  • Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu, Katedra Strategii i Metod Zarządzania, ul. Komandorska 118/120, 53-345 Wrocław, Poland, katarzyna.piorkowska@ue.wroc.pl
References
  • Adcock R., Collier D. [2001], Measurement Validity: A Shared Standard for Qualitative and Quantitative Research, „American Political Science Review”, vol. 95(3), https://doi.org/10.1017/s0003055401003100.
  • Aguinis H., Boyd B.K., Pierce Ch.A., Short J.C. [2011], Walking New Avenues in Management Research Methods and Theories: Bridging Micro and Macro Domains, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), March, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310382456.
  • Aguinis H., Pierce Ch.A., Bosco F.A., Muslin I.S. [2009], First Decade of Organizational Research Methods: Trends in Design, Measurement, and Data-analysis Topics, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 12(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108322641.
  • Bauer D.J. [2003], Estimating Multilevel Linear Models as Structural Equation Models, „Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics”, vol. 28(2), https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986028002135.
  • Bergman M.M. [2010], On Concepts and Paradigms in Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810376950.
  • Bergman M.M. [2011a], The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly in Mixed Methods Research and Design, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811433236.
  • Bergman M.M. [2011b], The Politics, Fashions, and Conventions of Research Methods, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811408318.
  • Berson Y., Avolio B.J., Kahai S. [2003], Level Specification: Using Triangulation in a Grounded Theory Approach to Construct Building [w:] Annual Review: Multi-level Issues in Organizational Behavior and Strategy, eds F.J. Yammarino, F. Dansereau, vol. 2, Elsevier Science, Oxford.
  • Berthod O., Grothe-Hammer M., Sydow J. [2016], Network Ethnography: A Mixed-method Approach for the Study of Practices in Interorganizational Settings, „Organizational Research Methods”, March, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116633872.
  • Bliese P.D. [2000], Within-group Agreement, Non-independence, and Reliability: Implications for Data Aggregation and Analyses [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Bliese P.D., Hanges P.J. [2004], Being Both Too Liberal and Too Conservative: The Perils of Treating Grouped Data as Though They Were Independent, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 7(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428104268542.
  • Burstein L., Linn R.L., Capell F.J. [1978], Analyzing Multilevel Data in the Presence of Heterogeneous Within-class Regressions, „Journal of Educational Statistics”, vol. 3(4), https://doi.org/10.2307/1164777.
  • Castro S.L. [2002], Data Analytic Methods for the Analysis of Multilevel Questions: A Comparison of Intraclass Correlation Coefficients, rwg(j), Hierarchical Linear Modeling, Within- and Between-analysis, and Random Group Resampling, „The Leadership Quarterly”, vol. 13, https://doi.org/10.1016/s1048-9843(01)00105-9.
  • Castro F.G., Kellison J.G., Boyd S.J., Kopak A. [2010], A Methodology for Conducting Integrative Mixed Methods Research and Data Analyses, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810382916.
  • Certo S.T., Sirmon D.G, Brymer R.A. [2010], Competition and Scholarly Productivity in Management: Investigating Changes in Scholarship from 1988 to 2008, „Academy of Management Learning and Education”, vol. 9(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amle.2010.56659878.
  • Chen G., Bliese P.D., Mathieu J.E. [2005], Conceptual Framework and Statistical Procedures for Delineating and Testing Multilevel Theories of Homology, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428105280056.
  • Cording M., Christmann P., Weigelt C. [2010], Measuring Theoretically Complex Constructs: The Case of Acquisition Performance, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127009355892.
  • Crede E., Borrego M. [2013], From Ethnography to Items: A Mixed Methods Approach to Developing a Survey to Examine Graduate Engineering Student Retention, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 7(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812451792.
  • Daigneault P.-M., Jacob S. [2014], Unexpected but Most Welcome: Mixed Methods for the Validation and Revision of the Participatory Evaluation Measurement Instrument, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 8(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813486190.
  • Dalton D.R., Dalton C.M. [2011], Integration of Micro and Macro Studies in Governance Research: CEO Duality, Board Composition, and Financial Performance, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310373399.
  • Dansereau F., Yammarino F. [2000], Within and Between Analysis: The Varient Paradigm as an Underlying Approach to Theory Building and Testing [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Denzin N.K. [2012], Triangulation 2.0, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437186.
  • Durand R. [2012], Advancing Strategy and Organization Research in Concert: Towards an Integrated Model?, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 10(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012453290.
  • Dyer N.G., Hanges P.J., Hall R.J. [2005], Applying Multilevel Confirmatory Factor Analysis Techniques to the Study of Leadership, „The Leadership Quarterly”, vol. 16, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2004.09.009.
  • Edmondson A.C., McManus S.E. [2007], Methodological Fit in Management Field Research, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 32(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.26586086.
  • Evans B.C., Coon D.W., Ume E. [2011], Use of Theoretical Frameworks as a Pragmatic Guide for Mixed Methods Studies: A Methodological Necessity?, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689811412972.
  • Flick U. [1992], Triangulation Revisited: Strategy of Validation or Alternative?, „Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour”, vol. 22(2), https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1992.tb00215.x.
  • Flick U. [1998], An Introduction to Qualitative Research, Sage, Thousand Oaks, London–New Delhi.
  • Flick U., Garms-Homolová V., Herrmann W.J., Kuck J., Röhnsch G. [2012], “I Can’t Prescribe Something Just Because Someone Asks for It…”: Using Mixed Methods in the Framework of Triangulation, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437183.
  • Freeman J.H. [1980], The Unit Problem in Organizational Research [w:] Frontiers in Organization and Management, ed. W.M. Evan, Praeger, New York.
  • Gelo O., Braakmann D., Benetka G. [2008], Quantitative and Qualitative Research: Beyond the Debate, „Integrative Psychological & Behavioral Science”, vol. 42, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12124-008-9078-3.
  • Gibson C.B. [2016], Elaboration, Generalization, Triangulation, and Interpretation: On Enhancing the Value of Mixed Method Research, „Organizational Research Methods”, April, https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428116639133.
  • Goertz G., Mahoney J. [2012], A Tale of Two Cultures: Qualitative and Quantitative Research in the Social Sciences, Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
  • Guerras-Martín L.Á., Madhok A., Montoro-Sánchez Á. [2014], The Evolution of Strategic Management Research: Recent Trends and Current Directions, „Business Research Quarterly”, vol. 17, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.brq.2014.03.001.
  • Guest G. [2012], Describing Mixed Methods Research: An Alternative to Typologies, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research, vol. 7(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812461179.
  • Hambrick D.C. [2004], The Disintegration of Strategic Management: It’s Time to Consolidate Our Gains, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 2(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127004040915.
  • Hambrick D.C. [2007], The Field of Management’s Devotion to Theory: Too Much of a Good Thing?, „Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 50(6), https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166119.
  • Handbook of Mixed Methods in Social & Behavioral Research [2010], eds A. Tashakkori, Ch. Teddlie, 2nd ed., Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Hart L.C., Smith S.Z., Swars S.L., Smith M.E. [2009], An Examination of Research Methods in Mathematics Education (1995–2005), „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 3(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689808325771.
  • Helfat C.E. [2007], Stylized Facts, Empirical Research and Theory Development in Management, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 5(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127007077559.
  • Hill A.D., Kern D.A., White M.A. [2012], Building Understanding in Strategy Research: The Importance of Employing Consistent Terminology and Convergent Measures, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127012445239.
  • Hitt M.A., Beamish P.W., Jackson S.E., Mathieu J.E. [2007], Building Theoretical and Empirical Bridges across Levels: Multilevel Research in Management, „Academy of Management Journal”, vol. 50(6), https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2007.28166219.
  • Hitt M.A., Boyd B.K., Li D. [2004], The State of Strategic Management Research and a Vision of the Future [w:] Research Methodology in Strategy and Management, eds D. Ketchen, D. Bergh, vol. 1, Elsevier, New York.
  • Hofmann D.A. [1997], An Overview of the Logic and Rationale of Hierarchical Linear Models, „Journal of Management”, vol. 23(6), https://doi.org/10.1016/s0149-2063(97)90026-x.
  • House R., Rousseau D.M., Thomas-Hunt M. [1995], The Meso Paradigm: A Framework for the Integration of Micro and Macro Organizational Behawior, „Research in Organizational Behavior”, vol. 17.
  • Howe K.R. [2012], Mixed Methods, Triangulation, and Causal Explanation, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 6(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689812437187.
  • James L.R., Williams L. [2000], The Cross-level Operator in Regression, ANCOVA, and Contextual Analysis [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, And New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Jarzabkowski P., Bednarek R., Lê J.K. [2014], Producing Persuasive Findings: Demystifying Ethnographic Textwork in Strategy and Organization Research, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554575.
  • Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J. [2014], Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm Whose Time Has Come, „Educational Researcher”, vol. 33(7).
  • Johnson R.B., Onwuegbuzie A.J., Turner L.A. [2007], Toward a Definition of Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 1(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689806298224.
  • Kelle U. [2001], Sociological Explanations between Micro and Macro and the Integration of Qualitative and Quantitative Methods [43 Paragraphs], „Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research”, vol. 2(1), art. 5, http://nbnresolving.de/urn:nbn:de:0114fqs010159.
  • Klein K.J., Cannella A., Tosi H. [1999], Multilevel Theory: Challenges and Contributions, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 24.
  • Kozlowski S.W.J., Klein K.J. [2000], A Multi-level Approach to Theory and Research in Organizations: Contextual, Temporal, and Emergent Processes [w:] Multilevel Theory, Research, and Methods in Organizations: Foundations, Extensions, and New Directions, eds K.J. Klein, S.W.J. Kozlowski, Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
  • Kozlowski S.W.J., Chao G.T., Grand J.A., Braun M.T., Kuljanin G. [2013], Advancing Multilevel Research Design: Capturing the Dynamics of Emergence, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 16(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428113493119.
  • Law K.S., Wong, C.S., Mobley W.M. [1998], Toward a Taxonomy of Multidimensional Constructs, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 23(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.1255636.
  • Locke E.A. [2012], Construct Validity vs. Concept Validity, „Human Resource Management Review”, vol. 22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2011.11.008.
  • MacKenzie S.B. [2003], The Dangers of Poor Construct Conceptualization, „Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science”, vol. 31(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070303031003011.
  • MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff P.M., Podsakoff N.P. [2011], Construct Measurement and Validation Procedures in MIS and Behavioral Research: Integrating New and Existing Techniques, „MIS Quarterly”, vol. 35(2).
  • Mathieu J.E., Chen G. [2011], The Etiology of the Multilevel Paradigm in Management Research, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310364663.
  • Mayoh J., Onwuegbuzie A.J. [2015], Toward a Conceptualization of Mixed Methods Phenomenological Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 9(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689813505358.
  • McKinley W. [2007], Managing Knowledge in Organization Studies through Instrumentation, „Organization”, vol. 14(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1350508407071863.
  • Molina-Azorín J.F. [2011], The Use and Added Value of Mixed Methods in Management Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 5(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689810384490.
  • Molina-Azorín J.F. [2012], Mixed Methods Research in Strategic Management: Impact and Applications, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 15(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428110393023.
  • Molina-Azorin J.F., Fetters M.D. [2016], Mixed Methods Research Prevalence Studies: Field-specific Studies on the State of the Art of Mixed Methods Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 10(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689816636707.
  • Molloy J.C., Chadwick C., Ployhart R.E., Golden S.J. [2011], Making Intangibles “Tangible” in Tests of Resource-based Theory: A Multidisciplinary Construct Validation Approach, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(5), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310394185.
  • Mossholder K.W., Bedeian A.G. [1983], Cross-level Inference and Organizational Research: Perspectives on Interpretation and Application, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1983.4284651.
  • Netemeyer R.G., Bearden W.O., Sharma S. [2003], Scaling Procedures: Issues and Applications, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Oxley J.E., Rivkin J.W., Ryall M.D. [2010], The Strategy Research Initiative: Recognizing and Encouraging High-quality Research in Strategy, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 8(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127010387821.
  • Piórkowska K. [2014a], Behavioral Strategies as Micro-foundations in Strategic Management, „Global Business&Economics Anthology”, vol. 2, December.
  • Piórkowska K. [2014b], Micro-foundations w teorii zarządzania strategicznego – czy to tylko retoryka?, Prace Naukowe Wałbrzyskiej Wyższej Szkoły Zarządzania i Przedsiębiorczości, Zarządzanie strategiczne. Rozwój koncepcji i metod, red. K. Krupski, t. 27(2), Wałbrzych.
  • Plano Clark V.L., Anderson N., Wertz J.A., Zhou Y., Schumacher K., Miaskowski Ch. [2015], Conceptualizing Longitudinal Mixed Methods Designs: A Methodological Review of Health Sciences Research, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 9(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689814543563.
  • Ployhart R.E., Vandenberg R.J. [2010], Longitudinal Research: The Theory, Design, and Analysis of Change, „Journal of Management”, vol. 36(1), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206309352110.
  • Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Podsakoff N.P. [2016], Recommendations for Creating Better Concept Definitions in the Organizational, Behavioral, and Social Sciences, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 19(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115624965.
  • Podsakoff N.P., Podsakoff P.M., MacKenzie S.B., Klinger R.L. [2013], Are We Really Measuring What We Say We’re Measuring? Using Video Techniques to Supplement Traditional Construct Validation Procedures, „Journal of Applied Psychology”, vol. 98(1), https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029570.
  • Popper K. [2002], The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Routledge, New York.
  • Powell T.C., Lovallo D., Fox C.R. [2011], Behavioral Strategy, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 32(13), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.968.
  • Ronda-Pupo G.A., Guerras-Martin L.Á. [2012], Dynamics of the Evolution of the Strategy Concept 1962–2008: A Co-Word Analysis, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 33(2), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.948.
  • Rousseau D.M. [1985], Issues of Level in Organizational Research: Multi-level and Cross-level Perspectives, „Research in Organizational Behavior”, vol. 7.
  • Rousseau D.M. [2011], Reinforcing the Micro/Macro Bridge: Organizational Thinking and Pluralistic Vehicles, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310372414.
  • Shepherd D.A. [2011], Multilevel Entrepreneurship Research: Opportunities for Studying Entrepreneurial Decision Making, „Journal of Management”, vol. 37(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206310369940.
  • Short J.C., Ketchen D.J. Jr., Bennett N., du Toit M. [2006], An Examination of Firm, Industry, and Time Effects on Performance using Random Coefficients Modeling, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 9(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428106287572.
  • Stańczyk-Hugiet E., Piórkowska K., Stańczyk S. [2016], Ewolucyjny nurt w naukach o zarządzaniu. Stan wiedzy, „Przegląd Organizacji”, nr 2.
  • Suddaby R. [2010], Editor’s Comments: Construct Clarity in Theories of Management and Organization, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 35(3), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2010.51141319.
  • Tashakkori A., Teddlie C. [1998], Mixed Methodology: Combining Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches, Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA.
  • Tepper B.J., Henle C.A. [2011], A Case for Recognizing Distinctions among Constructs that Capture Interpersonal Mistreatment in Work Organizations, „Journal of Organizational Behavior”, vol. 32(3), https://doi.org/10.1002/job.688.
  • Thietart R.-A. [2016], Strategy Dynamics: Agency, Path Dependency, and Self-organized Emergence, „Strategic Management Journal”, vol. 37(4), https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.2368.
  • Venkatraman N., Grant J.H. [1986], Construct Measurement in Organizational Strategy Research: A Critique and Proposal, „Academy of Management Review”, vol. 11(1), https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1986.4282628.
  • Vesa M., Vaara E. [2014], Strategic Ethnography 2.0: Four Methods for Advancing Strategy Process and Practice Research, „Strategic Organization”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1476127014554745.
  • Waldman D.A., Carter M.Z., Hom P.W. [2015], A Multilevel Investigation of Leadership and Turnover Behavior, „Journal of Management”, vol. 41(6), September, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206312460679.
  • Wheeldon J. [2010], Mapping Mixed Methods Research: Methods, Measures, and Meaning, „Journal of Mixed Methods Research”, vol. 4(2), https://doi.org/10.1177/1558689809358755.
  • Wong Ch.-S., Law K.S., Huang G.-H. [2008], On the Importance of Conducting Construct-Level Analysis for Multidimensional Constructs in Theory Development and Testing, „Journal of Management”, vol. 34(4), August, https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206307312506.
  • Zappa P., Lomi A. [2015], The Analysis of Multilevel Networks in Organizations: Models and Empirical Tests, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 18(3), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428115579225.
  • Zhang Z., Zyphur M.J., Preacher K.J. [2009], Testing Multilevel Mediation Using Hierarchical Linear Models: Problems and Solutions, „Organizational Research Methods”, vol. 12(4), https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428108327450.
Document Type
Publication order reference
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-fc6831ce-73dc-4d34-a64e-951cea1ab3d6
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.