Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2013 | 3(123) | 37–59

Article title

Szacowanie efektu nauczyciela na osiągnięcia edukacyjne uczniów z wykorzystaniem hierarchicznego modelowania liniowego

Title variants

EN
Estimating teacher effect using hierarchical linear modelling

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

PL
Nauczyciele, różniąc się efektywnością pracy, wpływają na wyniki uczniów. Analizowano dane z ogólnopolskiego badania przeprowadzonego w gimnazjach w 2012 r. Analizy objęły 3883 uczniów z 246 oddziałów, z 137 szkół i 202 nauczycieli matematyki oraz 4119 uczniów z 260 oddziałów, z 143 szkół i 215 nauczycieli języka polskiego. Wariancja wyników egzaminów przypisana nauczycielom wyniosła 12% (matematyka) i 8% (kompetencje językowe). W modelu uwzględniającym m.in.: wcześniejsze osiągnięcia, inteligencję, zmienne statusowe rodziny ucznia, efekt nauczyciela wyjaśnił 5% (matematyka) i 4% (kompetencje językowe) wariancji wyników egzaminu. Do tej pory nie było jasne, za pomocą jakich cech nauczycieli i stylu nauczania można wyczerpująco wyjaśnić zróżnicowanie efektywności ich pracy. Skala „autorytet nauczyciela/utrzymanie dyscypliny” wyjaśniła 91% efektu nauczyciela w nauczaniu matematyki i 81% w nauczaniu języka polskiego, przy kontroli wcześniejszych osiągnięć edukacyjnych, inteligencji, zmiennych statusowych rodziny ucznia i lokalizacji gimnazjum.
EN
This paper reports a study addressing how teacher effectiveness influences student outcomes in Polish Lower Secondary schools. Data from a Polish nationwide lower secondary school study were analysed. Data included 3883 pupils in 246 classes, in 137 schools with 202 maths teachers and 4119 pupils in 260 classes, in 143 schools with 215 language teachers. Variance of exam scores explained by teacher effect was 12% (maths) and 8% (language skills). Controlling for prior achievement, intelligence and student family background, teacher effects were 5% (maths) and 4% (language skills). Until now there has been no consensus about which teacher characteristics could explain variance in their effectiveness. The scale of “teacher authority/classroom management” explains 91% of exam scores in maths and 81% in language skills, when controlling for prior student achievement, intelligence, student family background and school location.

Journal

Year

Issue

Pages

37–59

Physical description

Dates

issued
2013-09-30

Contributors

  • Instytut Badań Edukacyjnych

References

  • Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K. i Scribner, J. P. (2007). Teacher quality, opportunity gap, and national achievement in 46 countries. Educational Researcher, 36(7), 369–387.
  • Anderson, C. S. (1982). The search for school climate – a review of the research. Review of Educational Research, 52(3), 368–420.
  • Armour, D. T. (1976). Analysis of the school preferred reading program in selected Los Angeles minority schools. Santa Monica, CA: Rand Corporation.
  • Ashton, P. i Crocker, L. (1987). Systematic study of planned variations – the essential focus of teacher – education reform. Journal of Teacher Education, 38(3), 2–8.
  • Blau, P. M. i Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  • Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of social capital. W: J. Richardson (red.) Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (s. 241–258). New York, NY: Greenwood Press.
  • Bourdieu, P. i Passeron, J. C. (1990). Reprodukcja: elementy teorii systemu nauczania. Warszawa: PWN.
  • Bowles, S. S. i Levin, H. M. (1968). More on multicollinearity and the effectiveness of schools. The Journal of Human Resources, 3(3), 393–400.
  • Brookover, W. B. (1982). Creating effective schools: an in-service program for enhancing school learning climate and achievement. Holmes Beach, FL: Learning Publications.
  • Brown, C., Smith, M. i Stein. M. (1996). Linking teacher support to enhanced classroom instruction. Referat wygłoszony na konferencji American Educational Research Association, New York, NY.
  • Brown, D. F. (2001). The value of advisory sessions for urban young adolescents. Middle School Journal, 32(4), 14–22.
  • Bryk, A. S., i Raudenbush S. (1992). Hierarchical linear models in social and behavioral research: applications and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Byrne, B., Coventry, W. L., Olson, R. K., Wadsworth, S. J., Samuelsson, S., Petrill, S. A., Willcutt, E. G. i Corley, R. (2010). „Teacher effects” in early literacy development: evidence from a study of twins. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(1), 32–42.
  • Byrne, C. (1983). Teacher knowledge and teacher effectiveness: a literature review, theoretical analysis and discussion of research strategy. Referat wygłoszony na konferencji Northwestern Educational Research Association, Ellenville, NY.
  • Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (wyd. 2.). Hillsdale, NJ: L. Erlbaum.
  • Coleman, J. S., Campbell, E. Q., Hobson, C. J., McPartland, J., Mood, A. B., Weinfeld, F. D., i York, R. L. (1966). Equality of educational opportunity. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office.
  • Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). Teacher quality and student achievement: a review of state policy evidence. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 8(1), 1–44.
  • Dolata, R. (2008), Szkoła – segregacje – nierówności. Warszawa: Wydawnictwa Uniwersytetu Warszawskiego.
  • Domański, H. i Pokropek, A. (2011). Podziały terytorialne, globalizacja a nierówności społeczne, Wprowadzenie do modeli wielopoziomowych, Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN.
  • Domański, H., Karpiński, Z., Pokropek, A., Przybysz, D., Sawiński, Z., Słomczyński, K. M. i Trzciński, R. (2012). Metodologia badań nad stratyfikacją społeczną. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.
  • Edmonds, R. (1979). Effective schools for urban poor. Educational Leadership, 37(1), 15–24.
  • Ehrenberg, R. G. i Brewer., D. J. (1995). Did teachers’ verbal ability and race matter in the 1960's? Coleman revisted. Economics of Education Review, 14(1), 1–21.
  • Evertson, C. M., Hawley, W. D. i Zlotnik, M. (1985). Making A difference in educational quality through teacher – education. Journal of Teacher Education, 36(3), 2–12.
  • Ferguson, R. F. i Ladd, H. L. (1996). How and why money matters: an analysis of Alabama schools. W: H. F. Ladd (red.). Holdine schools accountable. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution.
  • Forero, C. G., Maydeu-Olivares, A., i Gallardo-Pujol, D. (2009). Factor analysis with ordinal indicators: a Monte Carlo study comparing DWLS and ULS estimation. Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal, 16(4), 625–641.
  • Freiberg, H. J. (red.). (1999). School climate: measuring, improving and sustaining healthy learning environments. Philadelphia, PA: Falmer Press.
  • Goldhaber, D. D. i Brewer, D. J. (1997). Why don't schools and teachers seem to matter? Assessing the impact of unobservables on educational productivity. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 505–523.
  • Goldhaber, D. D. i Brewer, D. J. (2000). Does teacher certification matter? High school teacher certification status and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 22(2), 129–145.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1971). Teacher characteristics and gains in student achievement – estimation using micro data. American Economic Review, 61(2), 280–288.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1986). The economics of schooling production and efficiency in public schools. Journal of Economic Literature, 24(3), 1141–1177.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1989). The impact of differential expenditures on school performance. Educational Researcher, 18(4), 45–62.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1992). The trade-off between child quantity and quality. Journal of Political Economy, 100(1), 84–117.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1996). A more complete picture of school resource policies. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 397–409.
  • Hanushek, E. A. (1997). Assessing the effects of school resources on student performance: an update. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 19(2), 141–164.
  • Hart, S. A., Petrill, S. A. i Thompson, L. A. (2009). A factorial analysis of timed and untimed measures of mathematics and reading abilities in school aged twins. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(2), 63–69.
  • Hattie, J. A. C. (2009). Visible learning. A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. London, New York: Routledge.
  • Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., i Greenwald, R. (1994a). Does Money Matter? A Meta-analysis of studies of the effects of differential school inputs on student outcomes. Educational Researcher, 23(3), 5–14.
  • Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., i Greenwald, R. (1994b). Money does matter somewhere: a response to Hanushek. Educational Researcher, 23(4), 9–10.
  • Hedges, L. V., Laine, R. D., i Greenwald, R. (1996). The Effect of school resources on student achievement. Review of Educational Research, 66(3), 361–396.
  • Jakubowski, M., Pokropek, A. (2009). Badając egzaminy. Podejście ilościowe w badaniach edukacyjnych. Warszawa: CKE.
  • Jordan, H. R., Mendro, R., Weerasinghe, D. (1997). Teacher effects on longitudinal student achievement: a preliminary report on research on teacher effectiveness. Referat wygłoszony w National Evaluation Institute, Indianapolis, IN.
  • Klitgaard, R. E. i Hall, G. R. (1975). Are there unusually effective schools? Journal of Human Resources, 10(1), 90–106.
  • Koniewski, M. (2012). Szacowanie wpływu liczebności klasy na osiągnięcia edukacyjne uczniów z wykorzystaniem eksperymentu ex post facto. Edukacja, 117(1), 23–43.
  • Kovas, Y., Haworth, C. M. A., Petrill, S. A. i Plomin, R. (2007). Mathematical ability of 10-year-old boys and girls: genetic and environmental etiology of typical and low performance. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 40(6), 554–568.
  • Kreft, I. i Leeuw, J. de (1998). Introducing multilevel modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  • Lee, V. E. i Bryk, A. S. (1989). A multilevel model of the social distribution of high school achievement. Sociology of Education, 62(3), 172–192.
  • Marzano, R. J., Marzano, J. S. i Pickering, D. J. (2003). Classroom management that works. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
  • McDonald, R. P., Ho, M-H. (2002). Principles and Practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological methods, 7(1), 64–82.
  • McGue, M., Keyes, M., Sharma, A., Elkins, I., Legrand, L., Johnson, W. i Iacono, W. G. (2007). The environments of adopted and non-adopted youth: evidence on range restriction from the Sibling Interaction and Behavior Study (SIBS). Behavior Genetics, 37(3), 449–462.
  • Mosteller, F. i Moynihan, D. P. (1972). On equality of educational opportunity. New York: Random House.
  • Mullen, B. i Copper, C. (1994). The Relation between group cohesiveness and performance – an integration. Psychological Bulletin, 115(2), 210–227.
  • Murnane, R. J. (1985). Do effective teachers have common characteristics: interpreting the quantitative research evidence. Referat wygłoszony na National Research Council Conference on Teacher Quality in Science and Mathematics, Washington, D.C.
  • Murnane, R. J. i Phillips, B. R. (1981). What Do Effective Teachers of Inner-city Children Have In Common. Social Science Research, 10(1), 83–100.
  • Nestler, S. (2012). A Monte Carlo study comparing PIV, ULS and DWLS in the estimation of dichotomous confirmatory factor analysis. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 66(1), 127–143.
  • Nye, B., Konstantopoulos, S. i Hedges, L. V. (2004). How large are teacher effects? Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 26(3), 237–257.
  • Oliver, B., Harlaar, N., Hayiou, T., Hayiou, M. E., Kovas, Y., Walker, S. O., Petrill, S. A., Spinath, F. M., Dale, P. S. i Plomin, R. (2004). A twin study of teacher – reported mathematics performance and low performance in 7-year-olds. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96(3), 504–517.
  • Plowden, B. (1967). Children and their primary schools. London: HMSO.
  • Pokropek, A. (2009). Metody statystyczne wykorzystywane w szacowaniu trzyletnich wskaźników egzaminacyjnych. W: B. Niemierko i M. K. Szmigel (red.), Badania międzynarodowe i wzory zagraniczne w diagnostyce edukacyjnej (s. 137–153). Kraków: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Edukacyjnej.
  • Pokropek, A. (2013). Efekt rówieśników w nauczaniu szkolnym. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo IBE.
  • Pokropek, A. i Żółtak, T. (2012). Nowe modele jednorocznej EWD. W: B. Niemierko i M. K. Szmigel (red.), Regionalne i lokalne diagnozy edukacyjne (s.178–187). Kraków: Polskie Towarzystwo Diagnostyki Edukacyjnej.
  • Raudenbush, S. W. i Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical Linear Models (wyd. 2). Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Rice, J. M. (1902), Educational research: a test in arithmetic. The Forum, October, 281–297.
  • Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A. i Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417–458.
  • Robinson, G. E. (1990). Synthesis of research on the effects of class size. Educational Leadership, 47(7), 80–90.
  • Rosenholtz, S. J. (1986). Organizational conditions of teacher learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 2(2), 91–104.
  • Rowan, B., Chiang, F. S. i Miller, R. J. (1997). Using research on employees’ performance to study the effects of teachers on students’ achievement. Sociology of Education, 70(4), 256–284.
  • Rowan, B., Correnti, R. i Miller, R. J. (2002). What large-scale, survey research tells us about teacher effects on student achievement: insights from the prospects study of elementary schools. Teachers College Record, 104(8), 1525–1567.
  • Samejima, F. (1969). Estimation of latent ability using a response pattern of graded scores. (Psychometric Monograph No. 17). Richmond, VA: Psychometric Society.
  • Sanders, W. L., i Rivers J. (1996). Cumulative and residual effects of teachers on future student academic achievement. Research progress report. Knoxville, TN: University of Tennessee Value-Added Research and Assessment Center.
  • Scheerens, J., i Bosker, R. (1997). The foundations of educational effectiveness. New York: Pergamon.
  • Taylor, J., Roehrig, A. D., Hensler, B. S., Connor, C. M. i Schatschneider, C. (2010). Teacher quality moderates the genetic effects on early reading. Science, 328(5977), 512–514.
  • Wade, R. K. (1984). What makes a difference in inservice teacher education? A meta-analysis of research. Educational Leadership, 42(4), 48–54.
  • Wayne, A. J. i Youngs, P. (2003). Teacher characteristics and student achievement gains: a review. Review of Educational Research, 73(1), 89–122.
  • Wiley, D. E. i Yoon, B. (1995). Teacher reports on opportunity to learn-analyses of the 1993 California Learning Assessment System (CLAS). Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17(3), 355–370.
  • Wilkinson, I. A. G. (2002). Introduction: peer influences on learning: where are they? International Journal of Educational Research, 37(5), 395–401.
  • Woods, C. M. (2002). Factor analysis of scales composed of binary items: illustration with the Maudsley Obsessional Compulsive Inventory. Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment, 24(4), 215–223.
  • Wright, P. S., Horn. S. P. i Sanders. W. L. (1997). Teacher and classroom context effects on student achievement: implications for teacher evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 11(1), 57–67.

Notes

http://www.edukacja.ibe.edu.pl/images/numery/2013/3-3-koniewski-szacowanie-wplywu-nauczyciela.pdf

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
0239-6858

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-fcd71ffd-0240-4a5f-acd6-22f5837d0c95
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.