Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


Journal

2014 | 155 | 259-294

Article title

Konflikt jako zjawisko wyzwalające procesy uczenia się w administracji samorządowej. W poszukiwaniu modelu teoretycznego

Content

Title variants

EN
Conflict Triggers learning in local public administration: The Case of Community Conflict over Wastewater Treatment

Languages of publication

PL

Abstracts

EN
The authors analyze changes in the patterns of local public administration through organizational learning and neoinstitutional perspectives. The authors build a theoretical model of the social and institutional conditions of learning in the face of public dispute. This theory is based on a case study of a community conflict over wastewater treatment.

Contributors

  • Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, ul. Jagiellońska 57/59, 03-301 Warszawa
  • Akademia Leona Koźmińskiego, ul. Jagiellońska 57/59, 03-301 Warszawa

References

  • Argyris C., Schon D. 1978. Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective, Addison-Wesley: Reading.
  • Barzelay M. 2007. Learning from second-hand experience: Methodology for extrapolation-oriented case research, „Governance”, 20: 521–543.
  • Bevir M. 2011. Introduction, [w:] M. Bevir (red.), Sage handbook of governance, Sage: London.
  • Bouty I. and Gomez, M. L. 2010. Dishing up individual and collective dimensions in organizational knowing, „Management Learning”, nr 41: 545–559.
  • Boudon R. 2008. Efekt odwrócenia, Oficyna Naukowa: Warszawa.
  • Browne A., Wildavsky, A. 1983. Implementation as exploration. Implementation: How great expectations in Washington are dashed in Oakland, J. L. Pressman and A. Wildavsky (eds), University of California: Berkeley.
  • Bober J., Hausner J., Izdebski H., Lachiewicz W., Mazur S., Nelicki A., Nowotarski B., Puzyna W., Surówka K., Zachariasz I., Zawicki M. 2013. Narastające dysfunkcje, zasadnicze dylematy, konieczne działania. Raport o stanie samorządności terytorialnej w Polsce, UE Kraków, MSAP: Kraków.
  • Boxenbaum E., Jonsson, S. 2008. Isomorphism, Diffusion and Decoupling, [w:] Royston Greenwood, Christine Oliver, Kerstin Sahlin, Roy Suddaby (eds), The Sage Handbook of Organizational Institutionalism, Sage Publications: London.
  • Burawoy M. 1998. The Extended Case Method, „Sociological Theory”, 16(1): 5–32.
  • Bryson J.M. 2012. Strategic Planning and Management, [w:] B.G. Peters and J. Pierre (eds), The SAGE Handbook of Public Administration, SAGE: Los Angeles.
  • Bryson J. M., Berry F. S., Yang K. 2010. State of public strategic management research: A selective literature review and set of future directions, „The American Review of Public Administration”, 40: 495–521.
  • Bryson J. M., Freeman R. E., Roering W. D. 1986. Strategic planning in the public sector: Approaches and directions, [w:] B. Checkoway (ed.), Strategic perspectives on planning practice, 65–85, Lexington Books: Lexington, MA.
  • Crossan M. M., Lane H. W., White R. E. 1999. An organizational learning framework: From intuition to institution, „Academy of Management Review”, 24: 522–37.
  • Coleman J. S. 1990. Foundations of Social Theory, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press: Cambridge, MA.
  • Dalton R. 2006. Citizen politics: Public opinion and political parties in advanced industrial democracies, Washington: CQ Press.
  • DeLeon L. 2007. Public management, democracy and politics, [w:] E. Ferlie, L. E. Lynn, C. Pollit (eds), The Oxford handbook of public management, Oxford University Press: New York.
  • Denters B. 2011. Local governance, [w:] M. Bevir (ed.), Sage handbook of governance, 313–329, Sage: London.
  • Denters B., Rose L. E. 2005. Towards local governance?, [w:] B. Denters, L. E. Rose (eds), Comparing local governance. Trends and developments, Palgrave McMillan: London.
  • Denters B., Rose, I. 2005. Towards Local Governance?, [w:] Denters, B. Rose, I. (eds), Comparing Local Governance. Trends and Developments, Palgrave: Haundmills.
  • DiMaggio P., Powell W. 1983. The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collectiva rationality in organizational fields, „American Sociological Review”, 48: 147–160.
  • Dingwerth K. 2008. Private transnational governance and the developing world: A comparative perspective, „International Studies Quarterly”, 52, 3: 607–34.
  • Fligstein N., McAdam D. 2011. Toward a general theory of strategic action fields, „Sociological Theory”, 29: 1–26.
  • Flyvbjerg B., Landman T., Schram, S. (eds). 2012. Real social science. Applied phronesis, Cambridge University: New York.
  • Forester J. 2012. On the theory and practice of critical pragmatism: Deliberative practice and creative negotiations, „Planning Theory”, 1–18, http://plt.sagepub.com/content/early/2012/06/06/1473095212448750 [dostęp: 04.22.2013].
  • Freeman R. 2008. Learning in public policy, [w:] R. Goodin, M. Rein, M. Moran (eds), The Oxford handbook of public policy, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Frączkiewicz-Wronka A. 2009. Zarządzanie publiczne w teorii i praktyce ochrony zdrowia, Wolters Kluwer: Warszawa.
  • Gąciarz B., Bartkowski J. 2012. Samorząd a rozwój. Instytucje – obywatele – podmiotowość, Wydawnictwo IFiS PAN: Warszawa.
  • Gilardi F, Radaelli C. 2013. Governance and Learning, [w:] D. Levi-Faur (ed.), The Oxford handbook of Governance, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Gouldner A. W. 1954. Patterns of industrial bureaucracy, Free Press: Glencoe.
  • Hall P. A. 1993. Policy paradigms, social learning and the state: the case of economic policymaking in Britain, „Comparative Politics”, 25: 275–96.
  • Hallet T., Vetresca M. 2006. Inhabited institutions: Social interactions and organizational forms in Gouldner’s ‘patterns of industrial bureaucracy’, „Theory and Society”, 35: 213–236.
  • Hausner J. 2007. Od idealnej biurokracji do zarządzania publicznego, [w:] Mirosława Marody (red.), Współczesne społeczeństwo polskie, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar: Warszawa.
  • Hausner J. 2008. Zarządzanie publiczne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar: Warszawa.
  • Hummel R. P. 1990. Uncovering validity criteria for stories managers tell, „American Review of Public Administration”, 20: 303–314.
  • Hummel R. P. 1991. Stories managers tell: Why they are as valid as science, „Public Administration Review”, 51: 31–41.
  • Jessop B. 2011. Metagovernance, [w:] M. Bevir (ed.), Sage handbook of governance, Sage: London.
  • Kiser E. 1996. The revival of narrative in historical sociology: What rational choice theory can contribute, „Politics and Society”, 24: 249–271.
  • Koch J. 2011. Inscribed Strategies: Exploring the organisational nature of strategic lock-ins, „Organisation Studies”, 32: 337–363.
  • Kooiman J. 1993. Governance and governability: Using Complexity, dynamics and Diversity, [w:] J. Kooiman (ed.), Modern governance: Authority, steering, and democracy, Oxford University Press: Oxford.
  • Kooiman J. 2003. Governing as governance, Sage: London.
  • Lewenstein B. 2010. Między rządzeniem a współrządzeniem. Obywatelskie modele rozwoju społeczności lokalnych, [w:] J. Schindler, R. Skrzypiec (red.), Partycypacja społeczna w rozwiązywaniu problemów społeczności lokalnej, UW: Warszawa.
  • Lawrence T. B., Suddaby R. 2006. Institutions and institutional work, [w:] Stewart Clegg et. al. (eds), The Sage handbook of organization studies, Sage: London.
  • Lewicka-Strzałecka A. 2006. Opportunities and limitations of CSR in the post-communist countries: Polish case, „Corporate Governance”, 6(4): 440–448.
  • March J. G. 1991. Exploration and exploitation in organisational learning, „Organisation Science”, 2: 71–87.
  • March J. G. 2006. Rationality, foolishness and adaptive intelligence, „Strategic Management Journal”, 27: 201–214.
  • Meyer J., Rowan, B. 2006. Organizacje zinstytucjonalizowane. Struktura formalna jako mit i ceremoniał, [w:] Aleksandra Jasińska-Kania i in., Współczesne teorie socjologiczne, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar: Warszawa.
  • Mayntz R. 2001. Zur Selektivität der steuerungstheoretischen Perspektive, [w:] H. P. Burth, A. Görlitz (eds), Politische Steuerung in Theorie und Praxis, Nomos: Baden-Baden.
  • McLaverty P. 2011. Participation, [w:] M. Bevir (ed.), Sage handbook of governance, Sage: London.
  • Morawski W. 2001. Zmiana instytucjonalna, Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN: Warszawa.
  • Nonaka I., Takeuchi H. 2000. Kreowanie wiedzy w organizacji, Poltext: Warszawa.
  • Offe C. 1975. The theory of the capitalists state and the problem of policy formation, [w:] L.N. Lindberg, R. Alford, C. Crouch, C. Offe (eds), Stress and contradiction in modern capitalism, D.C. Heath: Lexington.
  • Olejniczak K. 2012. Wyzwanie ciągłego uczenia się, [w:] K. Olejniczak (red.), Organizacje uczące się. Model dla administracji publicznej, Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar: Warszawa.
  • Peters G. B. 2011. Institutional theory, [w:] M. Bevir (ed.), Sage handbook of governance, Sage: London.
  • Schatzki T. 1996. Social practices: A Wittgensteinian approach to human activity, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.
  • Schein E. H. 2004. Organizational culture and leadership (3rd ed.), Jossey Bass: San Francisco.
  • Schreyögg G., Sydow J., Holtmann P. 2011. How history matters in organisations: The case of path dependence, „Management & Organizational History”, 6(81): 81–100.
  • Scott W. Richard 2001. Institutions and Organizations, Sage: Thousand Oaks, CA (wydanie drugie).
  • Senge P. 2006. The fifth discipline. The Art and Practice of The Learning Organization, Currency Doubleday: New York.
  • Swieniewicz P. 2008. Cities in transition. From statism to democracy, [w:] M. Haus, H. Heinelt, M. Stweart (eds), Urban Governance and Democracy. Leadership and Community Involvement, Routledge: New York.
  • Stein S. J. 2004. The culture of education policy, Teachers College: New York.
  • Spławski M., Zybertowicz A. 2005. Dialog społeczny jako ciało obce w tkance polskiego życia społecznego. Analiza wstępna, [w:] D. Zalewski (red.), Dialog społeczny na poziomie regionalnym. Ocena szans rozwoju, IPiSS: Warszawa.
  • Sroka J. (red.) 2008. Wybrane instytucje demokracji partycypacyjnej w polskim systemie politycznym, IPiSS: Warszawa.
  • Stoker G. 1995. Local Governance. A Conceptual Challenge. 23rd European Consortium of Political Research Joint Sessions of Workshops. The Changing Local Governance of Europe: Bordeaux.
  • Thorpe R., Holt R. 2008. Practice-centred Research, [w:] R. Thorpe, R. Holt (eds), The Sage Dictionary of Qualitative Management Research, Sage: London.
  • Tolbert P., Zucker L. 1996. The institutionalization of institutional theory, [w:] S. R. Clegg, C. Hardy (eds), Handbook of organizational studies, Sage: London.
  • United National Development Program. 2007. Corporate social responsibility in Poland: Baseline study, UNDP: Warsaw.
  • Verweij M., Thompson M. (eds). 2007. Clumsy Solutions for a Complex World. Governance, Politics and Plural Perceptions, Palgrave Mcmillan: New York.
  • Visser M. 2003. Gregory Bateson on deutero-learning and double bind. A brief conceptual history, „Journal of History of the Behavioral Sciences”, 39(3): 269–278.
  • Yanow D., Tsoukas H. 2009. What is Reflection-In-Action? A Phenomenological Account, „Journal of Management Studies”, 46(8): 1339–1364.
  • Yanow D. 2009. Ways of knowing: Passionate humility and reflective practice in research and management, „American Review of Public Administration”, 39: 579–601.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-fd053ff3-8702-4071-9a6b-e86952877b1c
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.