Japan’s vision of East Asian regionalism − toward soft balancing strategy

• Authors: Bobowski Sebastian
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

East Asia is undoubtedly the region of unprecedented scale of dynamism of events, both in the economic and political terms. Growing economic power of China is nowadays a serious threat to the traditional regional diplomatic leadership of Japan, which has internal problems. Mutual distrust boosted by historical resentment contributed to the constitution of competing visions of East Asian regionalism, drawing, on the one hand, on the realm of values as the foundation of a common identity, and solidarity, on the other, on different concepts of membership of the Southeast, and South Asian countries, including the representatives of Oceania. Promoted through the path of soft diplomacy, Japanese vision of a broad community, involving, in addition to ASEAN, democratic countries of the South and Oceania, built on the foundation of universal values of the Western world, provided a natural counterbalance to the narrower, more conservative, strictly Asian concept of China. The involvement of the core of ASEAN, namely Singapore, Vietnam, Malaysia, Japan, South Korea, Australia, and New Zealand, together with Canada, Mexico, Chile and Peru in the Trans-Pacific Partnership, is confronted with Chinese counter-proposal in the form of Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership, which indicates that the soft strategy game has gone up to a higher level. The coming years will resolve the dilemma which vision of economic regionalism is more attractive and vital. The expected breakthroughs include, in particular, the conclusion of a trilateral China–Japan–the Republic of Korea free trade agreement, the implementation of the ASEAN Economic Community, the intensification of discussions around the RCEP project, and finally – the evolution of ambivalent, so far, Chinese stance towards TPP project. In the case of the latter, it is critical to observe the dialogue between China and ASEAN at the sectoral level, initiated in 2011, implementation of the Foreign Investment Protection Agreement concluded with Canada in 2012, and finally − negotiations on the free trade agreement with Australia. Undoubtedly, narrow Asian formula of regionalism in East Asia has lost its importance in the face of both intraand extra-regional challenges.

Keywords

EN

Japan; East Asian regionalism; soft balancing strategy

• Publisher: Uniwersytet Ekonomiczny we Wrocławiu. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Ekonomicznego we Wrocławiu
• Journal: Ekonomia XXI Wieku
• Year: 2014
• Issue: 4(4)
• Pages: 80-91

Contributors

author

Bobowski Sebastian

References

• Arner D.W., Lejot P., Wang W., 2010, Assessing East Asian Financial Cooperation and Integration, Singapore Year Book of International Law and Contributors, Singapore.
• Asian Strategy As I See It: Japan as the “Thought Leader” of Asia, speech by foreign minister Taro Aso, 7 December 2005, available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/fm/aso/speech0512.html.
• Cheng J.Y. S., June 2004, The ASEAN-China Free Trade Area: Genesis and Implications, “Australian Journal of International Affairs”, no. 58.
• Cho Y.N, Jeong J., May/June 2008, China’s Soft Power, “Asian Survey”, no. 48.
• Garrison J.A., 2005, China’s Prudent Cultivation of “Soft” Power and Implications for U.S. Policy in East Asia, “Asian Affairs: An American Review” no. 32.
• Higgott R., November 1998, The Asian Financial Crisis: A Study in the Politics of Resentment, “New Political Economy”, no. 3.
• Inoguchi T., 2002, Japan Goes Regional, [in:] Japan’s Asia Policy: Revival and Response, ed. T. Inoguchi, Palgrave, New York.
• Keohane R., Nye Jr. J., September/October 1998, Power and Interdependence in the Age of Information, “Foreign Affairs”, no. 77.
• Lampton D.M., 2005, China’s Rise in Asia Need Not Be at America’s Expense, [in:] Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D. Shambaugh, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Mansfield E., Milner H., 1999, The New Wave of Regionalism, “International Organization”, no. 53.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2001, available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia=paci/report2001.pdf.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2002, Japan and ASEAN in East Asia: A Sincere and Open Partnership, speech by prime minister Junichiro Koizumi, 14 January, 2002, available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/region/asia-paci/pmv0201/speech.html.
• Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Japan, 2005, Asian Strategy As I See It: Japan as the “Thought Leader” of Asia, speech by foreign minister Taro Aso, 7 December, 2005; available at: http://www.mofa.go.jp/announce/fm/aso/speech0512.html.
• Oga T., 2004, Rediscovering Asianness: The Role of Institutional Discourse in APEC, 1989-1997, “International Relations of the Asia-Pacific”, Vol. 4.
• Pyle K., 2007, Japan Rising: The Resurgence of Japanese Power and Purpose, Public Affairs, New York.
• Remapping East Asia, 2005, ed. T.J. Pempel, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.
• Rozman G., 2007, Japanese Strategic Thinking on Regionalism, [in:] Japanese Strategic Thought toward Asia, eds. G. Rozman, K. Togo, J.P. Ferguson, Palgrave, London.
• Samuels R., 2007, Securing Japan: Tokyo’s Grand Strategy and the Future of East Asia, Cornell University Press, Ithac.
• Shambaugh D., 2005, Return to the Middle Kingdom? China and Asia in the Early Twenty-First Century, [in:] Power Shift: China and Asia’s New Dynamics, ed. D. Shambaugh, University of California Press, Berkeley.
• Sohn Y., March 2010, Japan’s New Regionalism: China Shick, Universal Values and East Asian Community, Waseda Institute for Advanced Studies, Tokyo.
• Stubbs R., 2002, ASEAN Plus Three. Emerging East Asian Regionalism?, “Asian Survey”, no. 42.
• Tanaka H., Liff A P., December 2009, Japan’s Foreign Policy and East Asian Regionalism, Council on Foreign Relations, New York.
• Terada T., 2003, Constructing an East Asian Concept and Growing Regional Identity: From EAEC to
• ASEAN+3, “The Pacific Review”, no. 16.
• Vaisey S., December 2007, Structure, Culture, and Community: The Search for Belonging in 50 Urban Communities, “American Sociological Review”, no. 72.
• Webster T., 2007, Bilateral Regionalism: Paradoxes of East Asian Intergation, “Berkeley Journal of International Law”, Vol. 25.
• Wong J., Chan S., May/June 2003, China – ASEAN Free Trade Agreement: Shaping Future Economic Relations, “Asian Survey”, no. 43.
• Youjun Ch., 8 April 2013, East Asian FTA has great potential, but faces serious mutual obstacles, “Global Times”, available at: http://www.globaltimes.cn/content/773440.shtml#.UxpJus7xEtp.