PL EN


2017 (R. XVI) | 3(65) | 89-102
Article title

Uczestnictwo jako czynnik wyjaśniający demokratyczną emancypację Przypadek Cluj Napoca w Rumunii

Authors
Content
Title variants
EN
Participation as experiential factor in democratic emancipation Case of Cluj Napoca, Romania
Languages of publication
PL
Abstracts
PL
W artykule ukazano, w jaki sposób procesy partycypacyjne (w tym przypadku budżetowanie partycypacyjne) wpływają na motywacje i zwyczaje aktywnego obywatelskiego zaangażowania w społeczeństwie o dużym dystansie do władzy i wysokich wynikach unikania i niepewności. Wyniki pokazują, że prawie wszyscy respondenci zgłaszali zdobycie nowych umiejętności i wiedzy, jak również zwiększone upodmiotowienie (empowerment). Jego przejawy dotyczyły zarówno dalszego zaangażowania wspólnotowego, jak i większego poczucia prawa do monitorowania władz publicznych i pociągania ich do odpowiedzialności.
EN
The study explores how participatory processes (in this case, participatory budgeting) impact people’s motivation for and the habit of active civic engagement in a society with high power distance and high uncertainty avoidance scores. The findings show that almost all respondents reported the acquisition of new skills and knowledge, as well as an increased expression of empowerment. The manifestations of empowerment varied from further community activism, to increased feeling of entitlement to monitor public authorities and hold them accountable.
Issue
Pages
89-102
Physical description
Contributors
author
  • Arizona State University
References
  • Alexander A.C., Welzel C. (2011), Measuring Effective Democracy. The Human Empowerment Approach, „Comparative Politics”, pp. 271–289.
  • Allegretti U., Corsi C., Allegretti G. (2016), Constituent Process and Constituent Assembly: the making of constitutions through the larger involvement of citizens, Rassegna: Forum di Quaderni Costituzionali.
  • Daly K., Schugurensky D., Lopes K. (2009), Learning democracy by doing: alternative practices in citizenship learning and participatory democracy. Toronto: Ontario Institute for Studies in Education / University of Toronto.
  • Diamond L., Morlino L. (2005), Assessing the Quality of Democracy, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
  • Hofstede G., Hofstede G.J., Minkov M. (2010), Cultures and Organizations: Software of the Mind, 3rd Edition, New York: McGraw-Hill.
  • Inglehart R., Welzel C. (2007), Modernization, Cultural Change and Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Logan C., Mattes R. (2012), Democratising the measurement of democratic quality: Public attitude data and the evaluation of African political regimes, „European Political Science”, 11(4), pp. 469–491.
  • Maxwell J.A. (2013), Qualitative Research Design. An Interactive Approach, Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  • Morlino L. (2004), ‘Good’ and ‘bad’ democracies: How to conduct research into the quality of democracy, „Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics”, 20(1), pp. 5–27.
  • Morlino L. (2011), Changes for Democracy: Actors, Structures, Processes, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Panebianco S., Pahl-Wostl C. (2004), „Obstacles in Launching a Participatory Group Discussion and Modelling Process, International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software (p. 118), Osnabruck: Brigham Young University. Retrieved from International Congress on Environmental Modeling and Software.
  • Pickel S., Breustedt W., Smolka T. (2016), Measuring the quality of democracy: Why include the citizens’ perspective?, „International Political Science Review”, 37(5), pp. 645–655.
  • Russon-Gilman H. (2016), Democracy Reinvented. Participatory Budgeting and Civic Innovation in America, Washington, D.C.: Brookings Institution Press/Ash Center.
  • Saunders M., Lewis P., Thornhill A. (2007), Research methods for business students (4th ed.), Harlow, UK: Pearson Education Limited.
  • Serrat R., Petriwskyj A., Villar F., Warburton J. (2016), Learning Through Political Participation: A Case Study of Spanish Elders Involved in Political Organizations, „Adult Education Quarterly”, 66(2), pp. 169–187.
  • Serrat R., Warburton J., Petriwskyj A., Villar F. (2017, November 14), Political Participation and Late-Life Learning: A Cross-Cultural Study of Older People’s Participation, „Voluntas”, pp. 265–287.
  • Shank G.D. (2006), Qualitative research: A personal skills approach (2nd ed.), Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill/Prentice Hall.
  • Tewksbury R. (2009), Qualitative versus Quantitative Methods: Understanding Why Qualitative Methods are Superior for Criminology and Criminal Justice, „Journal of Theoretical and Philisophical Criminology”, 1(1), pp. 23–37.
  • Welzel C., Inglehart R.F. (2016), Misconceptions of Measurement Equivalence. Time for a Paradigm Shift, „Comparative Political Studies”, 49(8), pp. 1068–1094.
Document Type
Publication order reference
Identifiers
ISSN
1642-672X
YADDA identifier
bwmeta1.element.desklight-fed1ce5e-8b55-4fb2-8586-f8d9ffb0dcb0
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.