Full-text resources of CEJSH and other databases are now available in the new Library of Science.
Visit https://bibliotekanauki.pl

PL EN


2017 | 55 | 2(110) | 156-170

Article title

Postawy i zachowania młodych naukowców – doniesienie z pierwszego etapu badań międzynarodowych, ze szczególnym uwzględnieniem polskich respondentów

Title variants

EN
Attitudes and Behavior of Junior Researchers – Early Findings of an International Study with a Particular Focus on Polish Researchers

Languages of publication

PL EN

Abstracts

PL
CEL/TEZA: W artykule omówiono wybrane wyniki międzynarodowego projektu badawczego „Harbingers”, których celem jest prognoza zmian w komunikacji naukowej na podstawie analizy postaw i zachowań współczesnych młodych pracowników naukowych. Uwagę skupiono w szczególności na wynikach uzyskanych w badaniach przeprowadzonych na grupie polskich respondentów, porównując je z wynikami uzyskanymi dla całej międzynarodowej grupy badawczej. KONCEPCJA/METODY BADAŃ: Projekt „Harbingers” obejmuje badania prowadzone w siedmiu krajach w latach 2016–2018 metodą pogłębionych wywiadów indywidualnych z wykorzystaniem znormalizowanego kwestionariusza. Dodatkowo na zgromadzonych danych szczegółowych prowadzone są analizy statystyczne. W pierwszym etapie badań udział wzięło 116 młodych naukowców, w tym 10 z Uniwersytetu Warmińsko-Mazurskiego w Olsztynie. WYNIKI I WNIOSKI: Większość respondentów z badanych krajów zwracała uwagę na przeciążenie obowiązkami zawodowymi, wysokie wymagania oraz niepewne warunki pracy. Widoczne było ich skupienie na finalnej części pracy naukowej, a mianowicie publikowaniu jak największej liczby artykułów w najbardziej prestiżowych czasopismach. Nie stwierdzono znaczących różnic w zachowaniach i postawach związanych z komunikacją naukową uczestniczących w badaniach polskich młodych naukowców, w stosunku do zachowań i postaw młodych badaczy z innych krajów. ORYGINALNOŚĆ/WARTOŚĆ POZNAWCZA: Prowadzone badania są pierwszymi na świecie długookresowymi studiami związanymi ze zmianami w systemie komunikacji naukowej wśród młodych pracowników nauki.
EN
PURPOSE/THESIS: The aim of this study is to identify the changes in scholarly communication based on the analysis of attitudes and behaviors of junior researchers. APPROACH/METHODS: The study is being conducted in seven countries over a three-year period from 2016 to 2018 using a deep interview method. During the first year of the study, 116 early-career researchers have participated, including 10 participants from the University of Warmia and Mazury in Olsztyn, Poland. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: The majority of respondents from all countries have drawn attention to the fact that they were overwhelmed with their professional duties and unstable work environment. Their focus on publishing papers in highly-ranked journals was noticeable. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: It was first longitudinal and international study on changes in the scholarly communication among junior researchers.

Year

Volume

55

Issue

Pages

156-170

Physical description

Dates

received
2017-05-20
revised
2017-10-09
accepted
2017-12-28

Contributors

  • Pracownia Badań nad Komunikacją i Zarządzaniem Informacją Instytut Historii i Stosunków Międzynarodowych, Wydział Humanistyczny, Uniwersytet Warmińsko-Mazurski w Olsztynie, ul. Kurta Obitza 1, 10–725 Olsztyn
  • CIBER Research Ltd., 1 Westwood Farmhouse, Greenham, Newbury, United Kingdom

References

  • Bar-Ilan, J., Haustein, S., Peters, I., Priem, J., Shema, H. and Terliesner, J. (2012). Beyond Citations: Scholars’ Visibility on the Social Web [online]. arXiv preprint, [22.12.2017],. arXiv:1205.5611.
  • Bazeley, P. (2003). Defining Early Career in Research. Higher Education, 45(3), 257–79.
  • Bennion, A., Locke, W. (2010). The Early Career Paths and Employment Conditions of the Academic Profession in 17 Countries. European Review, 1These 8(S1), S7–S33.
  • Brechelmacher, A., Park, E., Ates, G., Campbell, D. F. (2015). The Rocky Road to Tenure–Career Paths in Academia. In: T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, B.M. Kehm (eds.) Academic Work and Careers in Europe: Trends, Challenges, Perspectives (13–40). Springer International Publishing.
  • Bridle, H., Vrieling, A., Cardillo, M., Araya, Y., Hinojosa, L. (2013). Preparing for an Interdisciplinary Future: A Perspective from Early-Career Researchers. Futures, 53, 22–32.
  • CIBER Report (2016). Early Career Researchers: The Harbingers of Change? [online]. Final Report CIBER, Year 1, [9.10.2017], http://ciber-research.eu/download/20161120-ECR_Year_1_final_report_071116.pdf
  • Corkery, C., Mitchell, J., Walker, V., Annan, R., Goel, N., Harvey, L., ... Vilches, S. L. (2013). The 2013 Canadian Postdoc Survey: Painting a Picture of Canadian Postdoctoral Scholars [online]. CASP-ACSP and Mitacs [26.12.2017], https://www.mitacs.ca/sites/default/files/caps-mitacs_postdoc_report-full_oct22013-final.pdf
  • Fransman, J. (2014). Becoming Academic in the Digital Age: Negotiations of Identity in the Daily Practices of Early Career Researchers [online]. Connected Communities and Early Career Researchers Workshop, City University, May 2014, [9.10.2017], https://www.srhe.ac.uk/downloads/FRANSMAN_Final_Report.pdf
  • Friesenhahn, I., Beaudry, C. (2014). The Global State of Young Scientists – Project Report and Recommendations. Berlin: Akademie Verlag.
  • Graham, H., Hill, K., Matthews, P., O’Brien, D.,Taylor, M. (2014). Connecting Epistemologies: Methods and Early Career Researchers in the Connected Communities Programme [online]. [9.10.2017], https://earlycareerresearchers.files.wordpress.com/2014/10/connecting-epistemologies-report.pdf
  • Harley, D., Acord, S.K., Earl-Novell, S., Lawrence, S., King, C.J. (2010). Assessing the Future Landscape of Scholarly Communication: An Exploration of Faculty Values and Needs in Seven Disciplines [online]. UC Berkeley: Center for Studies in Higher Education. [9.10.2017], https://escholarship.org/uc/item/15x7385g
  • Housewright, R., Schonfeld, R. C., Wulfson, K. (2013). Ithaka S+R US Faculty Survey 2012 [online]. Ithaka S+R [26.12.2017], http://www.sr.ithaka.org/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Ithaka_SR_US_Faculty_Survey_2012_FINAL.pdf
  • James, L., Norman, J., De Baets, A. S., Burchell-Hughes, I., Burchmore, H., Philips, A., Sheppard, D., Wilks, L., Wolffe, J. (2009). The Lives and Technologies of Early Career Researchers [online]. JISC; CARET, University of Cambridge; The Open University, UK. [9.10.2017], http://www.webarchive.org.uk/wayback/archive/20140614204612/http://www.jisc.ac.uk/publications/reports/2009/earlycareerresearchersstudy.aspx
  • Müller, R. (2014a). Racing for What? Anticipation and Acceleration in the Work and Career Practices of Academic Life Science Postdocs. Forum Qualitative Sozialforschung / Forum: Qualitative Social Research [online], 15(3), [22.12.2017], http://www.qualitative-research.net/index.php/fqs/article/view/2245
  • Müller, R. (2014b). Postdoctoral Life Scientists and Supervision Work in the Contemporary University: A Case Study of Changes in the Cultural Norms of Science. Minerva, 52(3), 329–349.
  • Mulligan, A., Mabe, M. (2011). The Effect of the Internet on Researcher Motivations, Behaviour and Attitudes. Journal of Documentation, 67(2), 290–311.
  • Nicholas, D., Rowlands, I. (2011). Social Media Use in the Research Workflow. Information Services and Use, 31(1–2), 61–83.
  • Nicholas, D., Boukacem-Zeghmouri Ch., Rodríguez-Bravo, B., Xu, J., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Herman, E., Świgoń, M. (2017a). Where and How Early Career Researchers Find Scholarly Information. Learned Publishing, 30(1), 19–29.
  • Nicholas, D., Jamali, H. R., Watkinson, A., Herman, E., Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., Allard, S., Levine, K. (2015a). Do Younger Researchers Assess Trustworthiness Differently When Deciding What to Read and Cite and Where to Publish? International Journal of Knowledge Content Development and Technology, 5(2), 45–63.
  • Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Jamali, H.R. (2015b). Analysis of Emerging Reputation Mechanisms for Scholars [online]. In: R. Vuorikari & Y. Punie (eds.). Analysis of Emerging Reputation and Funding Mechanisms in the Context of Open Science 2.0 (3–72). Part 1. European Commission, Joint Research Centre, Institute for Prospective Technological Studies. [9.10.2017], http://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/bitstream/JRC94952/jrc94952.pdf
  • Nicholas, D., Rodríguez Bravo, B., Watkinson, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Ch., Herman, E., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., Świgoń, M. (2017c). Early Career Researchers: Their Publishing and Authorship Practices. Learned Publishing, 30(3), 205–217.
  • Nicholas, D., Watkinson, A., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Ch., Rodríguez Bravo, B., Xu, J., Abrizah, A., Świgoń, M., Herman, E. (2017b). Early Career Researchers: Scholarly Behaviour and the Prospect of Change. Learned Publishing, 30(2), 157–166.
  • Rodríguez Bravo, B., Nicholas, D., Herman, E., Boukacem-Zeghmouri, Ch., Watkinson, A., Abrizah, A., Xu, J., Świgoń, M. (2017). Peer Review: the Experience and Views of Early Career Researchers. Learned Publishing 30(4), 269277.
  • Rowlands, I., Nicholas, D., Russell, B., Canty, N., Watkinson, A. (2011). Social Media Use in the Research Workflow. Learned Publishing, 24(3), 183–195.
  • Teichler, U., Cummings, W. K. (2015). Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession: A Varied Scene. In: Teichler, U., & Cummings, W. K. (eds) Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession (1–10). Springer International Publishing.
  • Tenopir, C., Volentine, R., King, D. (2013). Social Media and Scholarly Reading. Online Information Review, 37(2), 193–216.
  • Van Dalen, H.P., Henkens, K. (2012). Intended and Unintended Consequences of a Publish-or-Perish Culture: A Worldwide Survey. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 63(7), 1282–1293.
  • Waaijer, C. J., Macaluso, B., Sugimoto, C. R., Larivière, V. (2016). Stability and Longevity in the Publication Careers of US Doctorate Recipients. PloS one, 11(4), e0154741.
  • Watkinson, A., Nicholas, D., Thornley, C., Herman, E., Jamali, H. R., Volentine, R., ...and Tenopir, C. (2016). Changes in the Digital Scholarly Environment and Issues of Trust: An Exploratory, Qualitative Analysis. Information Processing & Management, 52(3), 446–458.

Document Type

Publication order reference

Identifiers

ISSN
0324-8194
EISSN
2392-2648

YADDA identifier

bwmeta1.element.desklight-ff12bcba-3095-4790-850c-fab6e646acf3
JavaScript is turned off in your web browser. Turn it on to take full advantage of this site, then refresh the page.