The Right for Regional Integration Organisations to Protect Democracy: Legitimacy at the Regional Level?

• Authors: Katrin Nyman-Metcalf , Ioannis Papageorgiou
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Recently there have been several examples of different regional integration systems intervening to prevent unconstitutional events. The interventions can be based on explicit powers or be developed in response to events. This happens despite most regional integration systems having economic cooperation rather than explicit democratisation aims. Organs that issue laws or take constraining decisions must have a clear right to do this and a basis for exercising power-in other words, be legitimate. Where legitimacy comes from is debated, but as most countries today are democracies or purport to be, it somehow emanates from the people. National governments have a higher degree of legitimacy than regional integration organisations, possibly except the European Union. Regional integration organisations have to prove their legitimacy. The article examines if, to what extent, and on what basis regional integration systems have the right to exercise an independent role on the global stage. Legitimacy is a precondition for effective application of decisions of the organisation. Given the frequent lack of strong enforcement mechanisms, the question of legitimacy becomes even more important. With strong legitimacy, decisions taken by the regional integration organisation will be followed to a large extent even despite absence of effective enforcement mechanisms.

Keywords

EN

African Union; ASEAN; democracy; enforcement; European Union; legitimacy; political community; regional institutions; regional integration; regional courts of justice; the Americas

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of European Studies
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 6
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 28-47

Dates

published

2016-02-01

online

2016-02-16

Contributors

author

Katrin Nyman-Metcalf

• Chair of Law and Technology, Tallinn Law School, Tallinn University of Technology Akadeemia tee 3, Tallinn 12618, Estonia

author

Ioannis Papageorgiou

• Aristotle University of Thessaloniki, Faculty of Law, Economics and Political Sciences, School of Political Sciences, Faculty of Law, Economics and Political Sciences Building, Thessaloniki 54124, Greece

References

• Acharya, A. (2006), ‘Europe and Asia. Reflections on a tale of two regionalisms,’ in B. Fort & D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence and Divergence, London: Routledge, pp. 312-321.
• Albertini, M. (1999), “L’unificazione europea e il potere costituente”, in Nazionalismo e Federalismo, Bologna: Il Mulino.
• Bieber, R. (2009), ‘The Lissabon-Urteil: an association of sovereign states,’ European Journal of Constitutional Law, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 395-405.
• BVerfG (2009), Bundesverfassungsgericht (Germany), 30 June 2009. Retrieved (also in English) from http://www.bundesverfassungsgericht.de/entscheidungen/es20090630_2bve000208en.html [accessed Dec 2015]
• Centre for Studies on Federalism (2009), International Democracy Watch (Draft Project), January 2009.
• Collins, R. (2009), ‘Constitutionalism as liberal-juridical consciousness: echoes from international law’s past,’ Leiden Journal of International Law, vol. 22, pp. 251-287. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0922156509005810[Crossref]
• Deutsch, K. W. et al. (2003), ‘Political Community and the North Atlantic Area,’ in B. F. Nelsen & A. Stubb (eds.) The European Union: Readings on the Theory and Practice of European Integration, 3rd edition, Boulder, CO: Lynne Renner Publishers, pp. 121-143.
• De Witte, B. (2009), ‘International law as a tool for the European Union,’ European Constitutional Law, vol. 5, no. 2 (June), pp. 265-283.
• Focarelli, C. (2012), International Law as Social Construct. The Struggle for Global Justice, Oxford: Oxford University Press. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199584833.001.0001[Crossref]
• Lake, D. A. (2009), ‘Regional hierarchy: authority and local international order,’ in Review of International Studies (British International Studies Association), vol. 35, Supplement S1, February 2009, pp. 35-58. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139087339.003[Crossref]
• Marquez-Ramos, L.; Martinez-Zarzoso, I. & Suarez-Burguet, C. (2011), ‘Determinants of deep integration: examining socio-political factors,’ Open Economies Review, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 479-500. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11079-009-9132-x [WoS][Crossref]
• Mather, J. (2006), Legitimizing the European Union: Aspirations, Inputs and Performance. London: Palgrave.
• Mattli, W. (1999), The Logic of Regional Integration, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Nyman-Metcalf, K. (2013), ‘Regional integration and sovereignty: the sum is more than its parts?’ in P. Sevastik (ed.) Aspects of Sovereignty, The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, pp. 83-100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004232679_006[Crossref]
• Nyman-Metcalf, K. & Papageorgiou, I. F. (2005), Regional Integration and Courts of Justice, Antwerpen/Oxford: Intersentia.
• -- (2015), Democracy through Regional Integration, Antwerpen: Intersentia.
• Schneiderman, D. (2006), ‘Transnational legality and the immobilization of local agency,’ in Annual Review of Law and Social Sciences, vol. 2, pp. 387-408.[WoS]
• Schütze, R. (2009), From Dual to Cooperative Federalism. The Changing Structure of European Law, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Tang, S. (2006), ‘Leadership in institution building. The case of ASEAN+3,’ in B. Fort & D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence and Divergence, London: Routledge, pp. 69-82.
• Terada, T. (2006), ‘The birth and growth of ASEAN+3’ in B. Fort & D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence and Divergence, London: Routledge, pp. 218-235.
• Von Bogdandy, A. (2008), ‘The European Union as situation, executive and promoter of the international law of cultural diversity - elements of a beautiful friendship,’ European Journal of International Law, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 241-275.[WoS]
• Webber, D. (2006), ‘Regional integration in Europe and Asia,’ in B. Fort & D. Webber (eds.) Regional Integration in East Asia and Europe: Convergence and Divergence, pp. 289-311.
• Wheare, K. C. (1951), Federal Government, 2nd ed., London: Oxford University Press.
• Williams, A. (2009), ‘Philosophy of EU law,’ Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, vol. 29(Autumn), pp. 549-577.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/bjes-2016-0002