Vulnerability Assessment of Participants in Lithuanian Criminal Proceedings in the Context of EU Regulations

• Authors: Rima Ažubalytė , Jolanta Zajančkauskienė
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Despite the applicable general principles and essential standards provided for in the law, the right of vulnerable persons (i.e. children under 18 years of age and vulnerable adults, for example, adults with mental disabilities) to a fair hearing at different stages of criminal proceedings in the EU is not yet ensured to the full extent. Based on both EU and Lithuanian legal regulation, this article will review only the principal provisions concerning the allocation of victims, suspects, and accused persons to the category of “vulnerable persons”. Due to the scope of the article, the vulnerability identification procedure falls outside this research. EU and national legislation suggest that early identification of vulnerability allows for the provision of specific protection measures during criminal proceedings. Analysis of EU and Lithuanian normative acts suggests that minor victims are a priori considered vulnerable and specific protection measures must apply in their case. Meanwhile, the vulnerability of adult victims and their specific protection needs are not assessed at any stage of the proceedings in Lithuania, although the Code of Criminal Procedure provides for certain specific protection measures for victims who, due to a public hearing or questioning, may be subject to “psychological trauma or other serious consequences”. Given future EU requirements concerning suspected or accused children and current recommendations concerning the consideration of suspected or accused adults as vulnerable participants of the proceedings, Lithuanian legal regulations in this area must be improved.

Keywords

EN

Criminal proceedings; assessment of vulnerability; vulnerable victim; vulnerability of suspected or accused persons

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Baltic Journal of Law & Politics
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 152-178

Dates

published

2014-12-01

received

2014-11-17

accepted

2014-12-29

online

2015-03-11

Contributors

author

Rima Ažubalytė

• Professor Mykolas Romeris University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)

author

Jolanta Zajančkauskienė

• Associate Professor Mykolas Romeris University, Faculty of Law (Lithuania)

References

• 1. Ažubalytė, Rima, Jolanta Zajančkauskienė. “Credibility of testimonies of vulnerable participants in a legal process: the Lithuanian case”: 34-51. In: 10 Years in the European Union - achievements, problems and expectations: XV international scientific conference (Riga: Turiba University, 2014).
• 2. Ažubalytė, Rima, Ramūnas Jurgaitis, and Jolanta Zajančkauskienė. Specifinės baudžiamojo proceso rūšys [Specific types of criminal proceedings]. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2011.
• 3. Belevičius, Linas. “Unification of Standards of Protection of the Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in the European Union.” Administratīvā un Kriminālā Justīcija: Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas teorētiski praktisks žurnāls (Riga, Latvijas Policijas akadēmijas izdevums) 1(66) (2014): 9-20.
• 4. Buczma, Sławomir R. “An Overview of the Law Concerning Protection of Victims of Crime in the View of the Adoption of the Directive 2012/29/EU Establishing Minimum Standards on the Rights, Support and Protection of Victims of Crime in the European Union.” ERA Forum 14 (2013): 235-250.
• 5. Flynn, Eilionor, and Anna Lawson. “Disability and Access to Justice in European Union”: 7-44. In: Lisa Waddington, Gerard Quinn, and Eilionor Flynn, eds. European Yearbook of Disability Law. Volume 4. Cambridge- Antwerp-Portland: Intersentia, 2013.
• 6. Hirschel, David J., and Karen B. Rubin. “Special Problems Faced by the Elderly Victims of Crime.” Journal of Sociology and Social Welfare 9 (1982): 357-374.
• 7. Jimeno-Bulnes, Mar. “Towards Common Standards on Rights of Suspected and Accused Persons in Criminal Proceedings in the EU?” CEPS Liberty and Security in Europe (February 2010): 1-20 // http://aei.pitt.edu/15104/1/Jimeno-Bulnes_on_rights_of_suspects.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 8. Kanapeckaitė, Jolanta. Baudžiamasis procesas dėl nusikalstamų veikų, kuriomis įtariami (kaltinami) asmenys su fiziniais ar psichikos trūkumais (sutrikimais) [Criminal proceedings concerning offenses that a person with physical or mental deficiencies (disabilities) is suspected (charged) to have committed]. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Lietuvos teisės universitetas, 2004.
• 9. Letschert, Rianne, and Conny Rijken. “Rights of Victims of Crime: Tensions between an Integrated Approach and a Limited Legal Basis for Harmonisation.” New Journal of European Criminal Law Vol. 4, No. 3 (2013): 226-255.
• 10. Levon, Justyna, and Paulius Veršekys. “Įtariamųjų ir kaltinamųjų teisių Lietuvos baudžiamajame procese stiprinimas: perspektyvinė analizė Europos Sąjungos teisėkūros kontekste” [The strengthening of the rights of the suspects and the accused persons in Lithuania: a prospective analysis in the context of the EU legislation]: 160-185. In: Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodeksui - 10 metų [Criminal Code of Republic of Lithuania - 10 years]. Vilnius, 2012.
• 11. Matuizienė, Eglė. Privataus kaltinimo bylų procesas kaip dispozityvumo realizavimo forma [Private prosecution procedure as a form of implementation of dispositivenes]. Daktaro disertacija. Vilnius: Mykolo Romerio universitetas, 2014.
• 12. McEwan, Jenny. “The Testimony of Vulnerable Victims and Witnesses in Criminal Proceedings.” Era Forum 10 (2009): 369-386.
• 13. McQuigg, Ronagh J.A. “Domestic Violence and the ECJ: Joined Cases C-483/09 and C-1/10 Magatte Gueye and Valentin Salmeron Sanchez.” European Public Law Vol. 8, No. 4 (2012): 645-654.
• 14. Nusikaltimų aukų teisių direktyva: naujas požiūris į artimųjų smurto aukas [The Victim‘s Rights Directive: a New Approach to Victims of Domestic Violence]. Žmogaus teisių stebėjimo institutas, Lietuvos Teisės institutas, Lygių galimybių plėtros centras [Human Rights Monitoring Institute, Law Institute of Lithuania, Centre of Equality Advancement]. Vilnius, 2014 // https://www.hrmi.lt/uploaded/Apzvalgos/Tyrimas_auku-teisiu-direkt.pdf (accessed January 3, 2015).
• 15. Sagatys, Gediminas. Vaiko teisė į šeimos ryšius. Europos žmogaus teisių ir pagrindinių laisvių apsaugos konvencijos įgyvendinimas Lietuvoje [The right of the child to family relations in the European convention on human rights and in the law of the Republic of Lithuania]. Vilnius, 2006.
• 16. Schünemman, Bernd. “Protection of Children and Other Vulnerable Victims against Secondary Victimisation: Making It Easier to Testify in Court.” Era Forum 10 (2009): 387-396.
• 17. Štarienė, Lijana. “Teisės į teisingą teismą, įtvirtintos Europos žmogaus teisių konvencijos 6 str., pobūdis, vieta ir apsaugos lygis kitų konvencijos teisių požiūriu” [The character, place and the level of protection of the right to a fair court established in Article 6 of the European Convention of Human Rights in the light of other rights]. Jurisprudence-Jurisprudencija 10(88) (2006): 40-48.
• 18. Trechsel, Stefan. Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings. Oxford University Press, 2005.
• 19. Vaikų, nukentėjusiųjų nuo nusikaltimų, apsauga Lietuvoje. Nacionalinė ataskaita. [The protection of child victims in Lithuania. National report]. Vilnius: Paramos vaikams centras. 2013.
• 20. Vidal Feernandez, Begona. “The Standing of the Victim in Criminal Proceeding throughout the European Union”: 202-223. In: Montserrat de Hoyos Sancho, ed. Criminal Proceedings in European Union: Essential Safeguards. Lex Nova, S.A.U., 2008.
• 21. Walklate, Sandra. Handbook of Victims and Victimology. Portland: Willan Publishing, 2007.
• 22. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Asmens, turinčio negalią, teisė gintis padedant gynėjui” [The right to defence of a disabled person with the help of a defence lawyer”]. Societal Innovations for Global Growth: Research Papers 1(1) (2012): 105-122.
• 23. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Fiziniai ar psichikos trūkumai (sutrikimai): procesinė teisinė samprata ir reikšmė, realizuojant asmens teisę į gynybą” [Physical or mental deficiencies (disorders): procedural legal concept and importance in realising the individual’s right to the defence]: 289-326. In: Petras Ancelis, et al. Sąžiningas baudžiamasis procesas: probleminiai aspektai [Fair criminal proceedings: problem aspects]. Vilnius: Industrus, 2009.
• 24. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Prozessualle Handlungsfähigkeit eines Verdächtigen (Beschuldigten)” [Procedural Capacity of a Suspected (Accused) Person]. Jurisprudence-Jurisprudencija 4(122) (2010): 245-259.
• 25. Zajančkauskienė, Jolanta. “Speciali pažeidžiamųjų įtariamųjų ar kaltinamųjų apsauga” [Special protection of the vulnerable suspects or of the accused persons]: 325-338. In: Jonas Prapiestis, et.al. Globalizacijos iššūkiai baudžiamajai justicijai [Challenges of globalization to criminal justice]. Vilnius: Registrų centras, 2014.
• 1. A. S. v. Finland. ECHR (September 28, 2010).
• 2. Bocos-Cuesto v. the Netherlands. ECHR (November 10, 2005).
• 3. Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union. OL C 326, 2012 10 26: 391-407.
• 4. Code of the Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2002, no. 37-1341.
• 5. Commission Recommendation 2013/C 378/02 of 27 November 2013 on procedural safeguards for vulnerable persons suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. OJ C 378, 24.12.2013: 8-10.
• 6. Commission Staff Working Document Impact Assessment Accompanying the document Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. SWD/2013/0480 final // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?qid=1415469073671&uri=CELEX:52013SC0480 (accessed November 10, 2014).
• 7. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Strengthening Victim’s Rights in the EU. COM (2011)274 Final // http://ec.europa.eu/justice/policies/criminal/victims/docs/com_2011_274_en.pdf (accessed November 6, 2014).
• 8. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions. An open and secure Europe: making it happen. SWD(2014) 63 final // http://ec.europa.eu/dgs/home-affairs/e-library/documents/basicdocuments/docs/an_open_and_secure_europe_-_making_it_happen_en.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 9. Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions Making progress on the European Union Agenda on Procedural Safeguards for Suspects or Accused Persons - Strengthening the Foundation of the European Area of Criminal Justice. COM/2013/0820 final // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/PDF/?uri=CELEX:52013DC0820&qid=1415465203454&from=EN (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 10. Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities and Optional Protocol // http://www.un.org/disabilities/documents/convention/convoptprot-e.pdf (accessed November 9, 2014).
• 11. Council Framework Decision 2002/475/JHA of 13 June 2002 on combating terrorism. Official Journal L 164, 22/06/2002: 0003-0007.
• 12. Criminal Proceedings against Maria Pupino. ECR I-5285 (2005).
• 13. Directive 2010/64/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the right to interpretation and translation in criminal proceedings. OJ L 280, 2010 10 26.
• 14. Directive 2011/36/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 5 April 2011 on preventing and combating trafficking in human beings and protecting its victims, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2002/629/JHA. OJ L 101, 15.4.2011.
• 15. Directive 2011/93/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on combating the sexual abuse and sexual exploitation of children and child pornography, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2004/68/JHA. OJ L 335/1, 17.12.2011.
• 16. Directive 2012/13/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 May 2012 on the right to information in criminal proceedings. OL L 142, 2012 61.
• 17. Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA. OL L 315, 2012 11 14.
• 18. Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty. OJ L 294, 2013 11 6.
• 19. European Convention on Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms. Official Gazette, 1995, no. 40-987.
• 20. F. and M. v. Finland. ECHR (July 17, 2007).
• 21. Green Paper from Commission “Procedural Safeguards for Suspects and Defendants in Criminal Proceedings throughout the European Union”. Brussels, 19.2.2003 COM(2003) 75 final // http://www.statewatch.org/semdoc/assets/files/commission/COM-2003-75.pdf (accessed November 9, 2014).
• 22. Lietuvos Respublikos apsaugos nuo smurto artimoje aplinkoje įstatymas [Law on protection against domestic violence]. Official Gazette, 2011, no. 72-3475.
• 23. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodekso 9, 154, 186, 280, 283 straipsnių ir priedo pakeitimo įstatymas [Law on the amendment of Articles 9, 154, 186, 280, 283 and the annex of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-03403.
• 24. Lietuvos Respublikos baudžiamojo proceso kodekso 9, 185, 186, 275, 276, 283 straipsnių ir priedo pakeitimo įstatymas [Law on the amendment of Articles 9, 185, 186, 275, 276 and 283 and the annex of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-10422.
• 25. Lietuvos Respublikos prokuratūros veiklos 2013 metais ataskaita [2013 Report of the Activities of the Prosecution Service of the Republic of Lithuania] // http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_l?p_id=466645&p_tr2=2 (accessed November 6, 2014).
• 26. Lietuvos Respublikos Vyriausybės nutarimas dėl valstybės smurto artimoje aplinkoje prevencijos ir pagalbos teikimo nukentėjusiesiems asmenims 2014-2020 metų programos patvirtinimo [Resolution of the Government of the Republic of Lithuania regarding approval of the 2014-2020 national programme for prevention of domestic violence and support for victims]. Register of Legal Acts, no. 2014-05986.
• 27. Proposal for a directive of the European Parliament and of the Council Proposal for a on procedural safeguards for children suspected or accused in criminal proceedings. Brussels, 27.11.2013, SWD(2013) 480 final (COM (2013) 8 22) // http://ec.europa.eu/justice/criminal/files/swd_2013_480_en.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 28. Recommendation No. R (97) 13 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States Concerning intimidation of witnesses and the rights of the defence. Adopted by the Committee of Ministers on September 10, 1997, at the 600th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies // http://www.coe.int/t/dghl/standardsetting/victims/recR_97_13e.pdf (accessed November 6, 2014).
• 29. Resolution of the Council of 10 June 2011 on a Roadmap for strengthening the rights and protection of victims, in particular in criminal proceedings. 2011/C 187/01 // http://eur-lex.europa.eu/legalcontent/EN/TXT/?uri=uriserv:OJ.C_.2011.187.01.0001.01.ENG#ntr5-C_2011187EN.01000101-E0005 (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 30. Resolution of the Council of 30 November 2009 on a Roadmap for strengthening procedural rights of suspected or accused persons in criminal proceedings. 2009/C 295/01. OJ C 295, 4.12.2009.
• 31. Ruling of Supreme Court of Lithuania of November 11, 2014. Criminal case no. 2K-432/2014.
• 32. Ruling of Vilnius District Court of November 26, 2008. Criminal case no. 1S-945-628/2008.
• 33. Ruling of Vilnius District Court of November 7, 2013. Criminal case no.1S-923-628/2013.
• 34. S.C. v.The United Kingdom. ECtHR, no. 60958/00 (2004).
• 35. The Carloway Review. Report and Recommendations (November 17, 2011) // http://www.scotland.gov.uk/About/Review/CarlowayReview (accessed November 9, 2014).
• 36. The Conclusions of the European Council (June 26/27, 2014) // http://www.consilium.europa.eu/uedocs/cms_Data/docs/pressdata/en/ec/143478.pdf (accessed November 8, 2014).
• 37. The ruling of the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Lithuania of 16 January 2006 on the compliance of Paragraph 4 (wording of 11 September 2001) of Article 131 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania, on the compliance of Paragraph 5 (wordings of 10 April 2003 and 16 September 2003) of Article 234, Paragraph 2 (wordings of 10 April 2003 and 16 September 2003) of Article 244, Article 407 (wording of 19 June 2003), Paragraph 1 (wording of 14 march 2002) of Article 408, Paragraphs 2 and 3 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 412, Paragraph 5 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 413 and Paragraph 2 (wording of 14 March 2002) of Article 414 of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania and on the petitions of the Šiauliai District Court, the petitioner requesting to investigate whether Article 410 (wording of 14 March 2002) of the Code of Criminal Procedure of the Republic of Lithuania is not in conflict with the Constitution of the Republic of Lithuania. Official Gazette, 2006, no. 7-254.
• 38. The Stockholm Programme - an Open and Secure Europe Serving and Protecting Citizens. 2010/C 115/01. OJ C 115, 2010 5 4.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/bjlp-2015-0006