Political Criteria vs. Political Conditionality: Comparative analysis of Slovenian and Croatian European Union accession processes

• Authors: Ana Bojinović Fenko , Ana Urlić
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This study analyses the differences in content and procedure in the application of political criteria and political conditionality in the EU accession processes of Slovenia and Croatia. The article ascertains that with regard to substance, the Commission and EU member states did apply political criteria more extensively and meticulously to Croatia in comparison to Slovenia, but mainly due to the difference in the states’ initial assessment of preparedness for EU membership and the application of the principle of own merits. Empirical results, however, show that the differences in political conditionality did not only stem from Croatia’s post-conflict conditions, but also from the EU’s experience of the 2004 and 2007 enlargements and the concern about the EU’s absorption capacity. As for the accession process procedure, the latter has increasingly empowered the Commission rather than EU member states, which bears relevance for future (Western Balkans) enlargements

Keywords

EN

EU accession process; political accession criteria; political conditionality; Croatia; Slovenia

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Croatian International Relations Review
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 21
• Issue: 72
• Pages: 107-137

Dates

published

2015-02-01

online

2015-03-11

Contributors

author

Ana Bojinović Fenko

author

Ana Urlić

References

• Accession Treaty: Treaty concerning the accession of the Republic of Croatia, signed in Brussels on 9 December 2011, in force since 1 July 2013. Available at http://register.consilium.europa.eu/doc/srv?l=EN&f=ST%2014409%202011%20INIT
• Barnes, I. and Barnes, P., 2010. ‘Enlargement’. In Cini M. and Perez- Solorzano Borragan, N. (eds) European Union Politics, 3rd edn (Oxford: Oxford University Press), pp. 418-34.
• Beurdeley, L., 2003. L’élargissement de l’Union européenne aux pays d’Europe centrale et orientale et aux îles du bassin méditerranéen, (Paris and Montréal: L’Harmattan).
• Boduszyński, M. P., 2013. ‘The Trials and Triumphs of Europeanization in Croatia: The Unbearable Weight of Structure and State-Building?’ In Elbasani, A. (ed.) European Integration and Transformation in the Western Balkans; Europeanization or Business as Usual (Oxon and New York: Routledge), pp. 39-53.
• Bojinović Fenko, A. and Požgan, J., 2014. Regionalisation of Slovenian foreign policy: escape from the Balkans, return to the Western Balkans. Studia Historica Slovenica 14 (1): 55-74.
• Bojinović Fenko, A. and Šabič, Z., 2014. Continuity And Change In Slovenia’s Foreign Policy: A Comparison To Yugoslavia And An Analysis Of The Post-Independence Period. In Keil, S. and Stahl, B (eds.) The Foreign Policies of Post-Yugoslav States; From Yugoslavia to Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 47-67.
• Bučar, B., 1999. ‘The Issue of the Rule of Law in the EU Enlargement Process: Aspects of Slovenian-Italian Relations’. In Benedek, W., Isak, H. and Kicker, R. (eds) Development and Developing International and European Law: Essays in Honour of Konrad Ginther on the Occasion of his 65th Birthday (Frankfurt am Main, etc.: Peter Lang), pp. 339-53.
• Bučar, B. and Brinar, I., 2002. ‘Nekateri pre(po)misleki ob vstopanju v EU.’ Teorija in praksa Vol. 39, No. 4, pp. 654-68.
• DeBardeleben, J., 2008. The Boundaries of EU Enlargement. Finding a place for neighbours, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
• European Commission (1997) Agenda 2000 - Commission Opinion on Slovenia’s Application for Membership of the European Union. Doc 97/19, 15 July.
• European Commission (1998) Regular Report of the Commission on Slovenia’s Progress towards accession.
• European Commission (1999) Regular Report of the Commission on Slovenia’s Progress towards accession. 13 October.
• European Commission (2001) Proposal for a Council Decision on the principles, priorities, intermediate objectives and conditions contained in the Accession Partnership with Slovenia. COM(2001) 662 final, 13 November.
• European Commission (2002) 2002 regular report on Slovenia’s progress towards accession. COM(2002) 700 final, 9 October.
• European Commission (2004) Communication from the Commission; Opinion on Croatia’s Application for Membership of the European Union. COM(2004) 257 final, 20 April.
• European Commission (2010) Commission staff working document. Croatia 2010 Progress Report. SEC(2010) 1326, 9 November.
• European Commission (2011) Interim report from the Commission to the Council and the European Parliament on reforms in Croatia in the field of judiciary and fundamental rights (negotiation chapter 23), COM(2011) 110, 2 March.
• European Commission (2012) Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament and the Council. Enlargement Strategy and Main Challenges 2012-2013. COM(2012) 600 final, 10 October.
• European Council (1993) Conclusions of the Presidency, Copenhagen, 21-22 June.
• European Council (1995) Conclusions of the Presidency, Madrid, 15-16 December.
• European Council (2002) Conclusions of the Presidency, Copenhagen, 13 December.
• European Council (2011) Conclusions of the Presidency, Brussels, 9 December.
• Jović, D., 2006. ‘Croatia and the European Union; a long delayed journey.’ Journal of Southern European and the Balkans, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 58-103.
• Jutarnji list, 2007. Grabar Kitarović: EU najstroža prema Hrvatskoj. 4 October. Available at: http://www.jutarnji.hr/grabar-kitarovic--eunajstroza-prema-hrvatskoj/271008.
• Jutarnji list, 2012. Milanović održao predavanje u Berlinu: ‘Put Hrvatske k EU je najteži od svih zemalja dosad!’ 19 September. Available at http://www.jutarnji.hr/milanovic-odrzao-predavanje-u-berlinu---put-hrvatske-k-eu-je-najtezi-od-svih-zemalja-dosad--/1054783/.
• Kajnč, S., 2009. ‘The Slovenian Presidency: Meeting Symbolic and Substantive Challenges.’ JCMS 47, (Annual Review), pp. 89-98.
• Kochenov, D., 2004. ‘Behind the Copenhagen façade. The meaning and structure of the Copenhagen political criterion of democracy and the rule of law.’ European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 8, No. 10.
• Kochenov, D., 2005. ‘EU Enlargement Law: History and Recent Developments: Treaty - Custom Concubinage?’ European Integration Online Papers, Vol. 9, No. 6.
• Pistotnik, S., 2010. Izbris kot poligon evropskih migracijskih politik ali “oprostite mi, prosim, ampak vaši predpisi so izbr isali moj status”. In Kogovšek, N. and Petković B. (eds.) Brazgotine izbrisa; Prispevek h kritičnemu razumevanju izbrisa iz registra stalnega prebivalstva Republike Slovenije. (Ljubljana: Mirovni inštitut), pp. 53-77.
• Lovec, M., 2012. ‘The European Union is no Free Lunch: Reconsidering the Eastern Enlargement of the EU from an Intergovernmental Perspective.’ Croatian International Relations Review, Vol. 17, No. 66, pp. 31-58.
• Mehikić, M. and Šabič, Z., 2008. Načela pogojevanja v Evropski uniji, (Ljubljana: Fakulteta za družbene vede).
• Memorandum of Understanding between the Government of the Republic of Slovenia and the Government of the Republic of Croatia, signed at Mokrice, 11 March 2013, in force since 14 March 2013.
• Noutcheva, G., 2012. European Foreign Policy and the Challenges of Balkan Accession: Conditionality, legitimacy and compliance, (London and New York: Routledge).
• Pridham, G., 2005. Designing Democracy - EU Enlargement and Regime Change in Post-Communist Europe, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan).
• Regional Cooperation Council. 2014. Overview. Available at: http://www.rcc.int/pages/2/overview.
• Rettman, A., 2012. Slovenia puts €172mn price tag on Croatia’s EU entry. EUObserver, 21 September. Available at: http://euobserver.com/enlargement/117629.
• Roter, P. and Bojinović, A., 2005. ‘Croatia and the European Union: a troubled relationship’. Mediterranean Politics, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp. 447-54.
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U., 2002. ‘Theorizing EU enlargement: research focus, hypotheses, and the state of research’. Journal of European Public Policy, Vol. 9, No. 4, pp. 500-28.[Crossref]
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U., 2005. ‘Conclusions: The Impact of the EU on the Accession Countries.’ In Schimmelfennig, F. and Sedelmeier, U. (eds) The Europeanization of Central and Eastern Europe, (Ithaca: Cornell University Press), pp. 210-28.
• Schimmelfennig, F. and Schwellnus, G., 2006. ‘Political Conditionality and Convergence: The EU’s Impact on Democracy, Human Rights, and Minority Protection in Central and Eastern Europe.’ Paper presented at the 5th Convention of the Central and East European International Studies Association, Tartu, 25-27 June.
• Schwellnus, G., 2006. ‘Double standards? Minority protection as a condition for membership.’ In Sjursen, H. (ed.) Questioning EU enlargement - Europe in search of identity, (New York: Routledge), pp. 186-202.
• Sedelmeier, U., 2014. ‘Anchoring Democracy from Above? The European Union and Democratic Backsliding in Hungary and Romania after Accession.’ JCMS 52 (1): 105-21. STA, 2008. Slovenia Will Give Croatia the Red Light on Friday, PM Says (IV). Available at: http://www.sta.si/en/vest.php?s=a&id=1347723.
• Šabič, Z., 2002. ‘Slovenia and the European Union: a different kind of twolevel game.’ In: Linden, R. H. (ed.) Norms and Nannies: The Impact of International Organizations on the Central and East European States, (Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield), pp. 91-127.
• Šelo Šabić, S., 2014. Croatia fast-forward Foreign Policy: From Yugoslavia to the EU. In Keil, S. and Stahl, B (eds.) The Foreign Policies of Post- Yugoslav States; From Yugoslavia to Europe (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan), pp. 69-96.
• Šeperić, M., 2011. To Europe and Back - The Croatian EU Accession Process and Its Outcomes. SEER Journal for Labour and Social Affairs in Eastern Europe, No. 4, pp. 463-80. Treaty on European Union as amended by the Treaty of Lisbon, signed in Lisbon on 13 December 2007, in force since 1 December 2009.
• Udovič, B., 2011. ‘The problem of hard-currency savings in Ljubljanska banka d. d., Ljubljana: between politics and (international) law.’ Studia Historica Slovenica, Vol. 11, No. 1, pp. 185-213. Interviews: Anonymous, 2012. High diplomatic source at the Slovenian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. Email interview with one of the authors. 25 September.
• Brozina, David, 2012. Undersecretary at the Permanent Representation of Slovenia at the EU, responsible for coordination of COREPER II and later national expert at the European Commission Directorate-General for Freedom, Security and Justice. Since 2011 he has acted as Minster Plenipotentiary at the Mission of Slovenia to Bosnia and Herzegovina. E-mail correspondence with one of the authors. 10 September. Drobnjak, Vladimir, 2012. Chief negotiator on EU accession for Croatia and later Ambassador to the Croatian Mission to the EU. E-mail correspondence with one of the authors. 13 September.
• Pusić, Vesna, 2012. Minister of Foreign Affairs of the Republic of Croatia. Email interview with one of the authors. 20 September.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/cirr-2015-0004