The EU’s Maritime Security Strategy: a Neo-Medieval Perspective on the Limits of Soft Security?

• Authors: Brendan Flynn
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This paper offers a critical interpretation of the EU’s recent Maritime Security Strategy (MSS) of 2014, making distinctions between hard and soft conceptions of maritime security. The theoretical approach employed invokes the ‘EU as neo-medieval empire’ (Bull 1977: 254-255; Rennger 2006; Zielonka 2006). By this account, the main objectives of EU maritime strategy are stability and encouragement of globalised maritime trade flows to be achieved using the classic instruments of ‘soft maritime security’. While replete with great possibilities, the EU’s maritime security strategy is likely to be a relatively weak maritime security regime, which suffers from a number of important limits.

Keywords

EN

European Union; maritime security strategy; hard and soft conceptions

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Croatian International Relations Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 22
• Issue: 75
• Pages: 9-37

Dates

published

2016-08-01

online

2016-09-18

Contributors

author

Brendan Flynn

References

• Arnold, G., 2015. Street-level policy entrepreneurship. Public Management Review, 17 (3): 307-327.
• Bailes, A. JK and Messervy-Whiting, G., 2011. Death of an institution: the end for Western European Union, a future for European defence? Egmont Paper, 46.
• Bueger, C., 2015. “What is maritime security?” Marine Policy, 53: 159-164.[WoS]
• Bull, H., 1977. The Anarchical Society. London: MacMillan.
• Calvo, A., 2014. Small Wars and Non-Lethal Force at Sea: The Wave of the Future? Small Wars Journal, July 17th, available at:
• Catalano, C., 2015. The Untold story: the Italian role in the development of a European Defence, In Marchi, L., Whitman, R., Edwards, G. Italy’s Foreign Policy in the Twenty-first Century: A Contested Nature? London: Routledge. pp. 88-95.
• Council Of The European Union., 2014. European Union Maritime Security Strategy as Adopted by the Council (General Affairs) on 24 June 2014, Brussels, 24 June 2014 (OR. en), 11205/14. Available at: .
• David, C. P., 2015. Policy Entrepreneurs and the Reorientation of National Security Policy under the G. W. Bush Administration (2001-04), Politics & Policy, 43(1): 163-195.
• Dijkstra, H., 2009. Commission versus Council Secretariat: an analysis of bureaucratic rivalry in European foreign policy.” European foreign affairs review, 14 (3): 431-450.
• Doyle, M. W., 1986. Liberalism and world politics. American Political Science Review, 80 (4): 1151-1169.
• Flynn, B., 2015. Counter Piracy Today: how essential is a mission for both NATO and the EU?, Atlantic Voices, 5 (8): 11-15. Available at: .
• Friedrichs, J., 2001. The meaning of new medievalism. European Journal of International Relations, 7 (4): 475-501.
• Gebhard, C. and Smith, S.J., 2014. The two faces of EU–NATO cooperation: Counter-piracy operations off the Somali coast. Cooperation and Conflict, 50(1): 107–127.
• Germond, B., 2015a. The Maritime Dimension of European Security: Seapower and the European Union. Palgrave Macmillan.
• Germond, B., 2015b. The geopolitical dimension of maritime security. Marine Policy. 54: 137-142.
• Germond, B., and Smith, M.E., 2009. Re-Thinking European Security Interests and the ESDP: Explaining the EU’s Anti-Piracy Operation, Contemporary Security Policy, 30(3): 573-593.
• Gould, A., 2015. Global assemblages and counter-piracy: public and private in maritime policing, Policing and Society, forthcoming.
• Gray, Colin S., 2011. Hard Power and Soft Power: The utility of military force as an instrument of policy in the 21st century. Strategic Studies Institute. Available at: .
• Hilsman, R., 1987. The politics of policy making in defense and foreign affairs: conceptual models and bureaucratic politics. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall.
• HM Government (UK)., 2014. The UK National Strategy for Maritime Security. May 2014. Available at: .
• House of Lords/European Union Committee., 2012. 31st Report of Session 2010-12: European Defence Capabilities: lessons from the past, signpost for the future. HL Paper 292. Available at: .
• Kaunert, C., and Zwolski. K., 2014. Somalia Versus Captain ‘Hook’: Assessing the EU’s Security Actorness in Countering Piracy Off the Horn of Africa. Cambridge Review of International Affairs, 27(3): 593-612.
• Keen, M., 1991. The Penguin History of Medieval Europe. London: Penguin.
• Kluth, M. F. and Pilegaard, J., 2011. Balancing beyond the horizon? Explaining aggregate EU naval military capability changes in a neo-realist perspective, European Security, 20 (1): 45-64.
• Lindley-French, J., 2004. The revolution in security affairs: hard and soft security dynamics in the 21st century.” European security, 13 (1-2): 1-15.[Crossref]
• Liss, C., 2013. New Actors and the State: Addressing Maritime Security Threats in Southeast Asia. Contemporary Southeast Asia: A Journal of International and Strategic Affairs, 35 (2): 141-162.
• Maddox, W. S. and Lilie, S.A., 1984. Beyond Liberal and Conservative: Reassessing the Political Spectrum. Washington, D.C.: Cato.
• Marquina, A., 1998. Spanish foreign and security policy in the Mediterranean, Mediterranean Historical Review, 13:1-2, 235-247.
• Marta, L., 2008. The UNIFIL II Mission in Lebanon: Italy’s Contribution. Real Instituto Elcano Papers. Available at .
• Patalano, A., 2015. Nightmare Nostrum? Not Quite: Lessons from the Italian Navy in the Mediterranean Migrant Crisis. The RUSI Journal, 160 (3): 14-19.
• Perlmutter, T., 1998. The Politics of Proximity: The Italian Response to the Albanian Crisis. International Immigration Review, 32(1): 203-222.
• Phillips, J. (2004) Macedonia: Warlords and Rebels in the Balkans. London: I.B. Tauris.
• Rao, P. V., 2010. Indian Ocean maritime security cooperation: the employment of navies and other maritime forces. Journal of the Indian Ocean Region, 6 (1): 129-137.
• Rennger, N. J., 2006. European communities in a neo-medieval global polity: the dilemmas of fairyland. In Kelstrup, M. and Williams, M. C., eds. International Relations Theory and the Politics of European Integration: Power, Security, and Community. London: Routledge. pp. 57-71.
• Riddervold, M., 2011. Finally flexing its muscles? Atalanta – The European Union’s naval military operation against piracy. European Security, 20 (3): 385-404.
• Riddervold, M., 2014. New Threats - Different Response: EU and NATO and Somali Piracy. European Security. 23 (4): 546-564.
• Riddervold, M., 2015. (Not) in the Hands of the Member States: How the European Commission Influences EU Security and Defence Policies. JCMS: Journal of Common Market Studies, forthcoming.
• Rynning, S., 2011. Realism and the Common Security and Defence Policy. Journal of Common Market Studies, 49 (1): 23-42.
• Schimmelfennig, F., 2001. The community trap: Liberal norms, rhetorical action, and the Eastern enlargement of the European Union. International organization, 55 (1): 47-80.
• Skeppström, E., Hull Wiklund, C. and Jonsson, M., 2015. European Union Training Missions: security sector reform or counter-insurgency by proxy? European Security, 24 (2): 353-367.
• Tardy, T., 2014. CSDP: getting third states on board. European Union Institute for Security Studies Brief 6.
• Trondal, J., Murdoch, Z. and Geys. B., 2015. On Trojan Horses and revolving doors: Assessing the autonomy of national officials in the European Commission. European Journal of Political Research, 54 (2): 249-270.
• Vanhoonacker, S., Hylke D., and Maurer, H., 2010. Understanding the role of bureaucracy in the European security and defence policy. EIOP. Available at: .
• White, N. D., and MacLeod, S. 2008. EU operations and private military contractors: issues of corporate and institutional responsibility. European Journal of International Law, 19 (5): 965-988.
• Whitman, R. G. and Wolff, S., 2012. The European Union as a global Conflict Manager: capabilities and context in an interdependent world. In Whitman, R. G. and Wolff, S., eds. The European Union as a Global Conflict Manager. Oxfordshire: Routledge. pp 3-19.
• Wollert, C., 2013. Naval Assets: not just a tool for war. In Engelbrekt, K., Mohlin, M., Wagnsson, C., eds. The NATO Intervention in Libya: Lessons Learned from the Campaign. London: Routledge. pp. 128-149.
• Zielonka, J., 2006. Europe as Empire: The Nature of the Enlarged European Union. OUP, Oxford.
• Zielonka, J., 2011. The EU as an International Actor: Unique or Ordinary? European Foreign Affairs Review, 16, 281-301.
• Zielonka, J., 2013. The International System in Europe: Westphalian Anarchy or Medieval Chaos? Journal of European Integration, 35 (1): 1-18.
• Zielonka, J., 2014. Is the EU Doomed? London: John Wiley & Sons.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/cirr-2016-0001