Policy Autonomy, Coordination or Harmonization in the Persistently Heterogeneous European Union?

• Authors: Luděk Kouba , Michal Mádr , Danuše Nerudová , Petr Rozmahel
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Within the context of the continuing integration process in Europe, this paper addresses the question of whether policies in the EU should head towards autonomy, coordination or harmonization. Taking the path dependence effect into account, it is the authors’ opinion that Europe has gone too far in its integration process to be able to continue with policies being fully under the competences of individual member countries. However, the habitual question still arises: does fiscal policy need to be harmonized to a level comparable to monetary policy as these two policies, necessarily, complement each other? This paper argues that it does not. There are three main arguments discussed. Firstly, the authors build on the theory of fiscal federalism. Secondly, there are significantly different regimes of welfare states and extents of social policies among European countries, which strongly determine the character of public finance. And thirdly, the tax systems across Europe are also highly divergent, with many features of continuing tax competition.

Keywords

EN

European Union; Fiscal Policy; Heterogeneity; Policy Coordination; Policy Harmonization

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: DANUBE: Law and Economics Review
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 53-71

Dates

published

2016-03-01

online

2016-04-09

Contributors

author

Luděk Kouba

• Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

author

Michal Mádr

• Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

author

Danuše Nerudová

• Department of Accounting and Taxes, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

author

Petr Rozmahel

• Department of Economics, Faculty of Business and Economics, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic.

References

• Allen, F., Carletti, E. and Gray, J. (Eds.). (2013). Political, Fiscal and Banking Union in the Eurozone? (1st ed). Philadelphia: FIC Press.
• Annett, A., Decressin, J. and Deppler, M. (2005). Reforming the stability and growth pact. IMF Policy Discussion Paper 05/2.
• Aiginger, K. (2013). A new strategy for the European periphery. WWWforEurope Policy Paper, No. 1.
• Arthur, W. B. (1989). Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns, and Lock-In by Historical Events. The Economic Journal, 99(394), 116–131.[Crossref]
• Artis, M. J., Fidrmuc, J. and Scharler, J. (2008). The transmission of business cycles Implications for EMU enlargement. The Economics of Transition, 16(3), 559–582.
• Bargain, O. (2013). Fiscal Union in Europe? Redistributive and Stabilizing Effects of a European Tax-Benefit System and Fiscal Equalization Mechanism. Economic Policy, 28(75), 375–415.[Crossref]
• Beetsma, R. and Giuliodori, M. (2010). The Macroeconomic Costs and Benefits of the EMU and Other Monetary Unions: An Overview of Recent Research. Journal of Economic Literature, 48(3), 603–641.[Crossref]
• Begg, I. (2009). Fiscal Federalism, Subsidiarity and the EU Budget Review. Swedish Institute for European Policy Studies Report 2009:1.
• Bénassy-Quéré, A., Trannoy, A. and Wolff, G. G. (2014). Tax harmonization in Europe: Moving forward. Les notes du conseil d’analyse économique, 2014(1), 1–11.
• Bird, R. M. and Ebel, R. D. (2007). Fiscal Fragmentation in Decentralized Countries: Subsidiarity, Solidarity and Asymmetry (1st ed). Northampton: Edward Elgar Pub.
• Bordo, M. D., Jonung, L. and Markiewicz, A. (2013). A Fiscal Union for the Euro: Some Lessons from History. CESifo Economic Studies, 59(3), 449–488.[Crossref]
• Burda, M. and Wyplosz, Ch. (2012). Macroeconomics: A European Text (6th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Business Insider. (2015). Here’s What A ‘Grexit’ Would Cost Europe. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from .
• Calderoni, F. (2010). Organized Crime Legislation in the European Union: Harmonization and Approximation of Criminal Law, National Legislations and the EU Framework Decision on the Fight Against Organized Crime (1st ed). Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Clement-Wilz, L. (2014). Reforming Europe Transformation of EU Competence in the Field of Economics with the Anti-crisis Measures. Revue de L’OFCE, Debates and policies, No. 134: 99–110.
• Crespo-Cuaresma, J., Pfaffermayr, M., Amador, O. F. and Keppel, C. (2011). Macroeconomic Aspects of European Integration: Fiscal Policy, Trade Integration and the European Business Cycle. FIW Research Report Series, 2010/11, 4.
• Csürös, G. (2013). Characteristics, functions and changes (?) of EU budget. Juridical Current, 16(4), 92–107.
• Dabrowski, M. (2013). Fiscal or Bailout Union: Where Is the EU/EMU’s Fiscal Integration Heading? CASE Network Studies, 2013(466), 1–34.
• Darvas, Z., Rose, A. K. and Szapáry, G. (2005). Fiscal Divergence and Business Cycle Synchronization: Irresponsibility is Idiosyncratic. NBER Working Paper 11580.
• Darvas, Z. and Wolff, G. B. (2013). Should Non-Euro Area Countries Join the Single Supervisory Mechanism? DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 4(2), 141–163.
• David, P. A. (1985). Clio and the Economics of QWERTY. American Economic Review, 75(2), 332–337.
• De Haan, J., Berger, H. and Jansen, D. J. (2003). The end of the Stability and Growth Pact? CESifo Working Paper 1093.
• De Grauwe, P. (2012). Economics of Monetary Union (9th ed). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Edwards, Ch. and de Rugy, V. (2002). International Tax Competition: A 21st-Century Restraint on Government. Cato Institute Policy Analysis, 431.
• Faria, A. G. A. (1995). Tax coordination and harmonization. In: Shone, P. (Ed.), Tax policy Handbook (pp. 229–234). Washington: International Monetary Fund.
• Faure, M. D. (2000). The Harmonization, Codification and Integration of Environmental Law: A Search for Definition. European Environmental Law Review, 9(6), 174–182.
• Fernández-de-Córdoba, G. and Torres, J. L. (2012). Fiscal Harmonization in the European Union with Public Inputs. Economic Modelling, 29(5), 2024–2034.[Crossref]
• Financial Times. (2015). Size of Greece’s debt limits scope for solutions. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from .
• Gabrisch, H. (2011). A Macroeconomist’s View on EU Governance Reform: Why and How to Establish Policy Coordination? Economic Annals, 56(191), 69–88.
• Gabrisch, H. and Staehr, K. (2014). The Euro Plus Pact: Cost Competitiveness and External Capital Flows in the EU Countries. WWWforEurope Policy Paper, No. 15.
• Garcia, E. C., Pabsdorf, M. N. and Mihi-Ramirez, A. (2013). Fiscal Harmonization and Economic Integration in the European Union. Engineering Economics, 24(1), 44–51.[Crossref]
• Gelauff, G., Grillo, I. and Lejour, A. (Eds.). (2008). Subsidiarity and Economic Reform in Europe (1st ed). Heidelberg: Springer Science & Business Media.
• Giurescu, D. and Vasilescu, L. G. (2006). European Integration: Macroeconomic Coordination Risks. Annals of University of Petroşani, 6, 91–96.
• Gullo, D. (2013). The uncertain journey towards fiscal harmonization. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from .
• Hamaekers, H. (1993). Fiscal Sovereignty and Tax Harmonization. European taxation: official journal of the Confédération Fiscale Européenne, 33(1), 25–27.
• Hinarejos, A. (2013). Fiscal Federalism in the European Union: Evolution and Future Choices for EMU. Common Market Law Review, 50(6), 1621–1642.
• Holm-Hadulla, F., Hauptmeier, S. and Rother, P. (2012). The impact of expenditure rules on budgetary discipline over the cycle. Applied Economics, 44(25), 3287–3296.[Crossref]
• Kapić, J. and Bašić, M. (2013). Harmonization of international financial reporting. Business Consultant / PoslovniKonsultant, 5(1), 23–27.
• Kočenda, E., Kutan, A. M. and Yigit, T. M. (2008). Fiscal Convergence in the European Union. The North American Journal of Economics and Finance, 19(3), 319–330.
• Köhler-Töglhofer, W. (2011). Macro Coordination under the European Semester. Monetary Policy & the Economy, 2011(4), 59–73.
• Kubátová, K. (2012). Typologizace daňových mixů v zemích OECD. Littera Scripta, 5(2), 75–82.
• Lighian, E. M. (2012). Multilevel Governance and Principle of Subsidiarity in the European Union. Europolicy – Continuity and Change in European Governance, 6(1–2), 15–26.
• Machová, Z. and Kotlán, I. (2013). World Tax Index: New Methodology for OECD Countries, 2000–2010. DANUBE: Law and Economics Review, 4(2), 165–179.
• Mitchell, A., Sikka, P., Christensen, J., Morris, P. and Filling, S. (2002). No Accounting for Tax Havens (1st ed). Basildon: Association for Accountancy & Business Affairs.
• Molnar, M. (2012). Fiscal Consolidation: What Factors Determine the Success of Consolidation Efforts? OECD Journal: Economic Studies, 5(1), 123–149.
• Mongelli, F. P. (2002). “New” views on the optimum currency area theory: what is EMU telling us? ECB Working Paper, No. 138.
• Musgrave, R. A. (1959). The Theory of Public Finance (1st ed). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• North, D. C. (1990). Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance (1st ed). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Oates, W. E. (1968). The Theory of Public Finance in a Federal System. The Canadian Journal of Economics / Revue canadienne d’Economique, 1(1), 37–54.
• Oates, W. E. (1972). Fiscal Federalism (1st ed). New York: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
• Oates, W. E. (2001). Fiscal Competition or Harmonization? Some Reflections. National Tax Journal, 54(3), 507–512.
• O’Shea, T. (2007). Tax Harmonization vs. Tax Coordination in Europe: Different Views. Tax Notes International, 46(8), 811–814.
• Pierson, P. (2004). Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis (1st ed). Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Rantala, A. (2003). Labour market flexibility and policy coordination in a monetary union. Bank of Finland Discussion Paper, 2003(11), 1–52.
• Rixen, T. and Viola, L. (2009). Uses and Abuses of the Concept of Path Dependence: Notes to-ward a Clearer Theory of Institutional Change. In: International Summer School on the Logic of Self-reinforcing Processes in Organizations, Networks, and Markets, Freie Universität Berlin.
• Roman, A. and Bilan, I. (2008). Appreciations concerning economic policies coordination in EMU. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series, 17(3), 509–512.
• Rozmahel, P., Grochová, L. and Litzman, M. (2014). The effect of asymmetries in fiscal policy conducts on business cycle correlation in the EU. WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 62.
• Rozmahel, P., Kouba, L., Grochová, L. and Najman, N. (2013). Integration of Central and Eastern European Countries: Increasing EU Heterogeneity? WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 9.
• Samuels, J. M. and Piper, A. (1985). International Accounting: A Survey (1st ed). London: Croom Helm.
• Schäfer, W. (2006). Harmonisation and centralisation versus subsidiarity: which should apply where? Inter economics: review of European economic policy, 46(5), 246–249.
• Shikwati, J. (2012). Towards African Tax Policy: Coordination, Rationalization or Harmonization? The African Executive. Retrieved February 6, 2015, from .
• Stockhammer, E. (2008). Wage Flexibility or Wage Coordination? Economic Policy Implications of the Wage-Led Demand Regime in the Euro Area. PERI Working Paper Series, No. 160.
• Straume, O. R. (2003). Economic integration and environmental policy coordination. Working Papers in Economics, No. 13/03, University of Bergen.
• Tanzi, V. (2008). The future of fiscal federalism. European Journal of Political Economy, 24(3), 705–712.[Crossref]
• Vallee, S. (2014). From Mutual Insurance to Fiscal Federalism: Rebuilding the Economic and Monetary Union after the Demise of the Maastricht Architecture. International Economics, 138, 49–62.
• Van Aarle, B. (2013). Surveillance and Control of Fiscal Consolidation on a Supranational Level. WWWforEurope Working Paper, No. 46.
• Wang, C. (2014). Accounting Standards Harmonization and Financial Statement Comparability: Evidence from Transnational Information Transfer. Journal of Accounting Research, 52(4), 955–992.[Crossref]
• Weingast, B. (2009). Second Generation fiscal federalism: The implications of fiscal incentives. Journal of Urban Economics, 65(3), 279–293.[Crossref]
• Zeitlin, J. (2005). The Open Method of Coordination in Question. In: Zeitlin, J., Pochet, P., & Magnusson, L. (Ed.), The Open Method of Coordination in Action: The European Employment and Social Inclusion Strategies (pp. 19–33). Brussels: Peter Lang.
• Zodrow, G. R. (2003). Tax competition and tax coordination in the European Union. International tax and public finance, 10(6), 651–671.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/danb-2016-0004