Primary Science Teaching – Is it Integral and Deep Experience For Students?

• Authors: Inge Timoštšuk
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Integral and deep pedagogical content knowledge can support future primary teachers’ ability to follow ideas of education for sustainability in science class. Initial teacher education provides opportunity to learn what and how to teach but still the practical experiences of teaching can reveal uneven development of student teachers’ professionality. The aim of the study is to describe how future primary teachers reflect on their experiences about science teaching and what components of science pedagogical content knowledge they see as meaningful. A questionnaire and interviews were used. The results reveal the deep impact of teaching practice on students’ understanding of the role of a teacher in supporting pupils’ acquisition of scientific skills. The experiences described are related more to teaching and learning in general and less with science-specific factors. Nevertheless, students described changes in mission e.g. how they learned about their role through pupils’ achievements and thinking about science. Changes in professional identity were mentioned rarely but this could point to an underestimated resource issue for teacher education. Positive changes in professional identity may help students to decide to choose more integral strategies in science teaching and thus promote more sustainability oriented teaching.

Keywords

EN

education for sustainable development; pedagogical content knowledge; primary science; student teachers; teachers’ learning experiences

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 7
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 82-99

Dates

published

2016-12-01

online

2016-06-08

Contributors

author

Inge Timoštšuk

• Tallinn University, Estonia

References

• Abell, S. K. (2008). Twenty years later: does pedagogical content knowledge remain a useful idea? International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1405–1416.[Crossref]
• Álvarez-García, O., Sureda-Negre, J., & Comas-Forgas, R. (2015). Environmental Education in Pre-Service Teacher Training: A Literature Review of Existing Evidence. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 17(1), 72–85.
• Anderson, D., & Clark, M. (2012). Development of syntactic subject matter knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge for science by a generalist elementary teacher. Teachers and Teaching, 18(3), 315–330.
• Appelton, K., & Kindt, I. (1999). Why teach primary science? Influences on beginning teachers’ practices. International Journal of Science Education, 21(2), 155–168.[Crossref]
• Avraamidou, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2010). In search of well-started beginning science teachers: insights from two first-year elementary teachers. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(6), 661–686.[Crossref]
• Basit, T.N. (2003). Manual or electronic? The role of coding in qualitative data analysis. Educational Research, 45(2), 143–154.[Crossref]
• Bentham, H. (2013). Clearing the path that has been laid: A conceptualisation of education for sustainable development. Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, 15(2), 25–41.
• Boyd, D.J., Grossman, P.L., Lankford, H., Loeb, S., & Wyckoff, J. (2009). Teacher preparation and student achievement. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 31(4), 416–440.[Crossref]
• Biggers, M., & Forbes, C. T. (2012). Balancing teacher and student roles in elementary classrooms: pre-service elementary teachers’ learning about the inquiry continuum. International Journal of Science Education, 34(14), 2205–2229.[Crossref]
• Brown, T. (2006). Negotiating psychological disturbances in pre-service teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 675–689.
• Bryan, L. A. (2003). Nestedness of beliefs: examining a prospective elementary teacher’s belief system about science teaching and learning. Journal of Research in Science Teaching and Learning, 40(9), 835–868.
• Bryan, L. A. (2012). Research on science teacher beliefs. In B.J. Fraser, K.G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second International Handbook of Science Education (pp. 477–495). Springer Netherlands.
• Carter, L. (2012). Globalization and science education: global information culture, post-colonialism and sustainability. In B.J. Fraser, K.G. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education (pp. 899–912). Springer Netherlands.
• Chang, M. (2009). An appraisal perspective of teacher burnout: Examining the emotional work of teachers. Educational Psychology Review, 21(3), 193–218.[Crossref]
• Chi, M. T. H. (1997). Quantifying qualitative analysis of verbal data: a practical guide. The Journal of Learning Sciences, 6(3), 271–315.
• Cochran-Smith, M., McQuillan, P., Mitchell, K., Terrell, D. G., Barnatt, J., D’Souza, L., et al. (2012). A longitudinal study of teaching practice and early career decisions. A cautionary tale. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 844–880.[Crossref]
• Cousin, G., & Deepwell, F. (2005). Designs for network learning: a communities of practice perspective. Studies in Higher Education, 30(1), 57–66.[Crossref]
• Creswell, J. W. (2008). Educational research. Planning, conducting, and evaluating quantitative and qualitative research (3rd ed.). New Jersey: Pearson Education.
• Davis, E.A., & Smithey, J. (2009). Beginning teachers moving toward effective elementary science teaching. Science Education, 93(4), 745–770.[Crossref]
• Denzin, N. K., & Lincoln, Y. S. (2000). Strategies of inquiry. Handbook of qualitative research, 2, 367–378. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Duit, R., & Treagust, D.F. (2012). How can conceptual change contribute to theory and practice in science education? In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. (pp. 107–118). Springer Netherlands.
• Fisher, H. E., Borowski, A. & Tepner, O. (2012). Professional knowledge of science teachers. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin and C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. (pp. 435–448). Springer Netherlands.
• Flores, M.A., & Day, C. (2006). Contexts witch shape and reshape new teachers’ identities: a multi–perspective study. Teaching and Teacher Education, 22, 219–232.
• Forbes, C. T., & Davis, E. A. (2008). Curriculum design for inquiry: pre-service elementary teachers’ mobilization and adaptation of science curriculum materials. Journal of research in science teaching, 47(7), 820–839.[Crossref]
• Fortus, D. & Krajcik, J. (2012). Curriculum coherence and learning progressions. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin & C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. (pp. 783–798). Springer Netherlands.
• Feiman-Nemser, S. (2008). Teacher learning: How do teachers learn to teach? In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Feiman-Nemser, D. J. McIntyre, & K. Demers (Eds.), Handbook of research on teacher education: Enduring questions in changing contexts (pp. 697–705). New York: Routledge.
• Friedrichsen, P., van Driel, J. H., & Abell, S. K. (2011). Taking a closer look at science teaching orientations. Science Education, 95(2), 358–376.[Crossref]
• Gerretson, H., Iliško, Dz. & Fortino, C. (2010). Sustaining self-regulated learning through inquiry-driven mathematics and science instruction. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(1), 3–17.
• Gray, T. H., Bastian, K.C. & Fortner, K.C. (2011). Early-career teacher effectiveness and attrition. Educational Researcher, 40(6), 271–280.[Crossref]
• Heckhausen, H. (1991). Motivation and action. New York: Springer.
• Heller, J.I., Kristen, R.D., Wong, N., Shinohara, M., & Miratrix, L.W., (2012). Differential effects on three professional development models on teacher knowledge and student achievement in elementary science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(3), 333–362.[Crossref]
• Hollins, E. R. (2011). Teacher preparation for quality teaching. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(4), 395–407.[Crossref]
• Kang, N.-H. (2007). Elementary teachers’ teaching for conceptual understanding: Learning from action research. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 18(4), 469–495.[Crossref]
• Korthagen, F. (2004). In search of the essence of a good teacher: towards a more holistic approach in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 77–97.
• Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2005). Levels in reflection: core reflection as a means to enhance professional growth. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 11(1), 47–71.
• Kleickmann, T., Richter, D., Kunter, M., Elsner, J., Besser, M., Krauss, S., & Baumert, J. (2013). Teachersëcontent knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: The role of structural differences in teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 64(1), 90–106.[Crossref]
• Lloyd, J. K., Smith, R. G., Fay, C. L., Khang, G. N., Wah, L. L. K., & Sai, C. L. (1998). Subject knowledge for science teaching at primary level: a comparison of preservice teachers in England and Singapore. International Journal of Science Education, 20(5), 521–532.[Crossref]
• Loughran, J., Mulhall, P., & Berry, A. (2008). Exploring pedagogical content knowledge in science teacher education. International Journal of Science Education, 10 (13), 1301–1320.[Crossref]
• Loughran, J., Milroy, P., Berry, A., Gunstone, R., & Mulhall, P. (2001). Documenting science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge through PaP-eRs. Research in Science Education, 31, 289–307.[Crossref]
• Lederman, N. G., Lederman, J. S., & Bell, R. L. (2004). Constructing Science in Elementary Classrooms. New York: Pearson Education.
• Malderez, A., Hobson, A. Tracey, L., & Kerr, K. (2007). Becoming a student teacher: core features of the experience. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30 (3), 225–248.[Crossref]
• Meijer, P., Korthagen, F., & Vasalos, A. (2009). Supporting presence in teacher education: The connection between the personal and professional in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 297–308.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Moore, F. M. (2008). Professional identity and science teacher professional development. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(6), 684–710.[Crossref]
• Munck, M. (2007). Science pedagogy, teacher attitudes, and student success. Journal of Elementary Science Education, 19 (2), 13–24.
• Newton, L. D., & Newton, D. P. (2001). Coordinating science across the primary school. The subject leader’s handbook. London: Routledge Falmer.
• Nilsson, P., & Loughran, J. (2012). Exploring the development of pre-service science elementary teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 23(7), 699–721.[Crossref]
• Nilsson, P., & van Driel, J. (2010). Teaching together and learning together-Primary science student teachers’ and their mentors’ joint teaching and learning in the primary classroom. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26(6), 1309–1318.
• Otero, V. K., & Nathan, M. J. (2008). Preservice elementary teachers’ views of their students’ prior knowledge of science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 497–523.[Crossref]
• Patton, M. Q. 2002. Qualitative research & evaluation methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
• Pekrun, R., Frenzel, A. C., Goetz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2007). The control-value theory of achievement emotions: An integrative approach to emotions in education. In P. A. Schutz, & R. Pekrun, (Eds.). Emotions in education. (pp. 13–36). San Diego: Elsevier.
• Pipere, A., Reunamo, J., & Jones, M. (2010). Perceptions of research in education for sustainable development: An international perspective. Discourse and Communication for Sustainable Education, 1(2), 5–24.
• Pipere, A., Veisson, M., & Salīte, I. (2015). Developing research in teacher education for sustainability: UN DESC via the Journal of Teacher Education for Sustainability, Journal of Teacher Education For Sustainability, 17(2), 5–44.
• Poulou, M. (2007). Student–teachers’ concerns about teaching practice. European Journal of Teacher Education, 30(1), 91–110.
• Rodgers, C. R., & Scott, K. H. (2008). The development of the personal self and professional identity in learning to teach. In M. Cochran-Smith, S. Nemser-Freiman, (Eds.). Handbook of Research on Teacher Education. Enduring Questions in Changing Contexts. Third Edition. (pp. 732–755). New York: Routledge.
• Schneider, R. M., & Plasman, K. (2011). Science teacher learning progressions. A review of science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge development. Review of Educational Research, 81(4), 530–565.
• Schram, A.B. (2014). A mixed method content analysis of the research literature in science education. International Journal of Science Education, 36 (15), 2619–2638.[Crossref]
• Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15, 4–14.[Crossref]
• Sikka, H., & Timoštšuk, I. (2008). The role of reflection in understanding teaching practice. Problems of Education in the 21st Century, 7, 147–152.
• Zembal-Saul, C. (2008). Learning to teach elementary school science as argument. Science Education, 93(4), 687–719.[Crossref]
• Zembylas, M. (2007). Emotional ecology: the intersection of emotional knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge in teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 23, 355–367.
• Timoštšuk, I., & Sikka, H. (2008). Identity statements of student teachers in the initial stage of teacher training as indicators of environmental, cognitive and relationship mechanisms. In J. Mikk, M. Veisson, P. Luik (Eds.), Reforms and Innovations in Estonian Education (pp. 95–107). Peter Lang Publishers House.
• Timoštšuk, I. 2009. Coping of trainee-teachers in influencing pupils’ study environment. In J. Hytönen (Ed.), Educational environment in early childhood in Estonia and Finland. IV. Collection of Articles (pp. 75–85). Helsinki: University of Helsinki.
• Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste. A. (2010). Student teachers’ professional identity. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1563–1570.
• Timoštšuk, I., & Ugaste. A. (2012). The role of emotions in student teachers’ professional identity.” European Journal of Teacher Education, 35(4), 421–433.[Crossref]
• Trent, J., & Gao, X. (2009). “At least I’m the type of teacher I want to be”: second-career English language teachers’ identity formation in Hong Kong secondary schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 37, 253–270.[Crossref]
• Yoon, H.-G., Joung, Y.J., & Kim, M. (2012). The challenges of science inquiry teaching for pre-service teachers in elementary classrooms: difficulties on and under the scene. Research in Science Education, 42, 589–608.[Crossref]
• Van Driel, J.H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(1), 26–28.[Crossref]
• Van Huizen, P., Van Oers, B., & Wubbels, T. (2005). A Vygotskian perspective on teacher education. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 37(3), 269–290.[Crossref]
• Wallace, J., & Loughran, J. (2012). Science teacher learning. In B. J. Fraser, K. Tobin and C. J. McRobbie (Eds.), Second international handbook of science education. (pp. 295–306). Springer Netherlands.
• Wenger, E. 1998. Communities of practice. Leaning, meaning, and identity. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Science Education in Europe: National Policies, Practices and Research (2011). Eurydice. European Commission. Retrieved on April 18, 2016, from
• Teaching and Learning International Survey (2009). Organization for economic cooperation and Development. Retrieved on April 18, 2016, from .

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/dcse-2016-0006