AirBaltic Case Based Analysis of Potential for Improving Employee Engagement Levels in Latvia through Gamification

• Authors: Daiga Ērgle
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

In 2014, airBaltic Corporation introduced a gamified electronic platform called Forecaster with a purpose to increase its employee engagement. The article considers the approach used by the organisation, analyses results, advantages and drawbacks of the organisation, and mainly formulates recommendations for the organisation in order to improve impact on employee engagement through gamification. As a result of the research, the author proposes 8 steps that are useful and applicable to any organisation, and as such those may serve a broader purpose than just improving airBaltic Forecaster tool. The objective of the paper is to draw learnings and put forward suggestions for the organisations in Latvia that are concerned with improving their employee engagement and demonstrate how gamification can be helpful in their endeavour.

Keywords

EN

Employee engagement; gamification; human resource management

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Economics and Business
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 28
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 45-51

Dates

published

2016-04-01

online

2016-06-10

Contributors

author

Daiga Ērgle

• University of Latvia

References

• airBaltic Intranet. (2015). about airBaltic. Retrieved from Intra.Airbaltic.com.
• Aparicio, A., Vela, F., Sánchez, J., & Montes, J. (2012). Analysis and application of gamification. Elche, Alicante, Spain. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2379636.2379653[Crossref]
• Badgeville. (2015). Game Mechanics. Retrieved from Badgeville.com: https://badgeville.com/products/gamification
• Bartle, R. (1996, August 28). HEARTS, CLUBS, DIAMONDS, SPADES: PLAYERS WHO SUIT MUDS. Colchester, Essex, United Kingdom.
• Bunchball. (2015, June 1). Nitro Gamification Platform. Retrieved from Bunchball. com: http://www.bunchball.com/products/nitro
• Cook, W. (2013). 5 reasons you can’t ignore gamification. Newton: Inward Strategic Consulting.
• Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). The psychology of optimal experience. New York: Harpen & Row.
• Deci, E., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. (2001). Extrinsic rewards and intrinsic motivations in education: reconsidered once again. Review of Educational Research, 1-27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3102/00346543071001001[Crossref]
• Deterding, S. (2011). Situated motivational affordances of game elements: a conceptual model. Vancouver, Canada: CHI 2011.
• Deterding, S. (2012). Gamification: designing for motivation. Interactions, 14-17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2212877.2212883[Crossref]
• Deterding, S., Dixon, D., Khalad, R., & Nacke, L. (2011, September 28-30). From game design elements to gamefulness: defining Gamification. Mindtrek. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2181037.2181040[Crossref]
• Dixon, D. (2011). Player types and gamification. Vancouver: CHI.
• Fogg, B. (2009). A behavior model for persuasive design. California: Persuasive Technology Lab, Stanford University. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/1541948.1541999[Crossref]
• Ghafele, R., & Gibert, B. (2011). Crowdsourcing patent application review: leveraging new opportunities to capitalize on innovation? Intellectual Property Quarterly, 23-33, No. 3.
• Ghani, J., & Deshpande, S. (1994). Tasks characteristics and the experience of optimal flow in human-computer interaction. The journal of psychology, 381-391. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00223980.1994.9712742[Crossref]
• Hamari, J., & Koivisto, J. (2013). Social motivations to use gamification: an empirical study of gamifying exercise. Proceedings of the 21st European Conference on information systems. Utrecht.
• Han, T., Chiang, H., & Chang, C. (2010). Employee participation in decision making, psychological ownership and knowledge sharing: mediating role of organizational commitment in Taiwanese high-tech organizations. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 21(12), 2218-2233.[Crossref][WoS]
• Harvard business school analytical review. (2013). The impact of employee engagment on performance. London: Harvard business review publisher.
• Higgins, A. (2014, July 16). 3 Examples of gamification in the workplace. Retrieved from Concur.com: https://www.concur.com/blog/en-us/3-examples-of-gamification-in-the-workplace
• Huatari, K., & Hamari, J. (2012). Defining gamification - a service marketing perspective. Presented at MindTrek’12. (pp. 17-22). Proceedings of the 16 the International Academic Mind Trek Conference.
• Institute of Employment Studies. (2004). Report Summary: The drivers of employee engagement. Retrieved July 7.
• Nicholson, S. (2012). A User-centered theoretical framework for meaningful gamification. Games + learning + Society (pp. 1-7). Madison, WI: School of Information Studies, Syracuse University
• Robson, K., Plangger, K., Kietzmann, J., McCarthy, I., & Pitt, L. (2015). Is it al a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Elsevier.[WoS]
• Ryan, R., Rigby, C., & Przybylski, A. (2006). The Motivational Pull of Video Games: A Self Determination Approach. Motiv Emot, Springer Science, 347-363.
• Seaborn, K., & Fels, D. (2015). Gamification in theory and action: Asurvey. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 74, 14-31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.006[Crossref]
• Shayon, S. (2013b, June 13). Gamification with new aviation empire game. Retrieved from Brandchannel.com: http://brandchannel.com/2013/06/13/klm-readies-full-on-social-gamification-with-new-aviation-empire-game/
• Speckund. (2015). Gartner Hype Cycle of Emerging Technologies, Hypes und Trends für 2014 / 2015. Retrieved May 8, 2015, from speckund.ch: http://speckund.ch/2/gartner-hype-cycle-emerging-technologies-2014-2015/
• TNS. (2015). airbaltic corporation TRI*M Employee Commitment Survey.
• Riga: TNS.
• Villaroel, J., & Reis, F. (2011). A stock Market Approach to Online Distributed Innovation: the Trade-off between Speculation and Innovation Performance.
• Workshop on social computing and user generated content ACM-EC’11, (pp. 1-5). San Jose.
• Werback, K. (2014). (Re)Defining Gamification: A Process Approach. Persuasive Technology: Lecture Notes in Computer Science, pp. 266-272. http:// dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07127-5_23[Crossref]
• Xu, Y. (2011). Literature review on web application gamification and analytics. Honolulu: Collaborative Software Development Lab, University of Hawai.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/eb-2016-0007