A Theoretical Analysis of the Directed Lie Question (DLC)

• Authors: Nathan J. Gordon
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

EN

Directed Lie Comparison (DLC); Probable Lie Comparison (PLC); CQT

• Publisher: Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
• Journal: European Polygraph
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 9
• Issue: 2
• Pages: 85-88

Dates

published

2015-06-01

online

2015-07-29

Contributors

author

Nathan J. Gordon

• The Academy for Scientifi c Investigative Training Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA

References

• Abrams, S. (1991). Th e Directed Lie Control Question. Polygraph, 20 (1), 26-31.
• Abrams, S. (2001). Statistics and Other Lies. Polygraph, 30 (1), 29-35.
• Backster, C. (1969). Technique Fundamentals of the Tri-Zone Polygraph Test. New York. Backster Research Foundation.
• Honts, C.R., Raskin, D.C. (1988). A Field Study of the Validity of the Directed Lie Control Question. Journal of Police Science and Administration, 16 (1), 56-61.
• Matte, J.A., Reuss, R.M. (1999). Validation of Potential Response Elements in the Directed Lie Question. Polygraph 28 (2), 124-142.
• Reid, J.E. (1947). A Revised Questioning Technique in Lie Detection Tests. Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 37 (6), 542-547.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ep-2015-0004