Examiner Approach and its Impact on Polygraph Results

• Authors: Tuvya T. Amsel
• Languages of publication: EN

Keywords

EN

polygraph examiner; polygraph results

• Publisher: Krakowska Akademia im. Andrzeja Frycza Modrzewskiego
• Journal: European Polygraph
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 10
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 7-10

Dates

published

2016-03-01

online

2016-04-30

Contributors

author

Tuvya T. Amsel

• Tel Aviv, Israel

References

• Barland G.H. (1975), Detection of Deception in Criminal Suspects: A Field Validation Study, unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Utah.
• Ben-Shakhar G., Bar-Hillel M., Lieblich I. (1986), Trial by Polygraph: Scientific and Juridical Issues in Lie Detection, Behavioral Science and the Law, 4, 459–479.[Crossref]
• Ben-Shakhar G., Furedy J.J. (1990), Theories and Applications in the Detection of Deception: A Psycho-physiological and International Perspective, Springer-Verlag, New York.
• Deskovic v. City of Peekskill et al, U.S District Court, Southern District of N.Y, 07-cv-8150, 34, 35.
• Elaad E., Ginton A., Ben-Shakhar G. (1994), The Effects of Prior Expectations and Outcome Knowledge on Polygraph Examiners’ Decisions, Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7, 279–292.[Crossref]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/ep-2016-0002