Adapting Structuration theory as a Comprehensive Theory for Distance Education: The ASTIDE Model

• Authors: Md Aktaruzzaman , Margaret Plunkett
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

Distance Education (DE) theorists have argued about the requirement for a theory to be comprehensive in a way that can explicate many of the activities associated with DE. Currently, Transactional Distance Theory (TDT) (Moore, 1993) and the Theory of Instructional Dialogue (IDT) (Caspi & Gorsky, 2006) are the most prominent theories, yet they still do not represent a unified and comprehensive theory for DE. This paper provides a review of the existing literature on DE theories and identifies potential gaps in theorising distance education. Building on Giddens’ (1984) work, an innovative approach to theorising DE is proposed through the conceptualisation of the Adapting Structuration Theory In Distance Education (ASTIDE) model as a means to explicate DE operations and practices at the institutional and national/international level. It also presents evidence, from a larger study, of the necessity of a comprehensive model such as the ASTIDE constructed through an investigation into the DE systems of developing and developed countries.

Keywords

EN

Distance education; Structuration Theory; TDT; IDT; ASTID

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: European Journal of Open, Distance and E-Learning
• Year: 2016
• Volume: 19
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 19-35

Dates

published

2016-07-01

online

2016-07-26

Contributors

author

Md Aktaruzzaman

• Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

author

Margaret Plunkett

• Monash University, Melbourne, Australia

References

• 1. Aktaruzzaman, M. (2014). Community perception towards integrating vocational elements in open and distance learning in Bangladesh. Peer reviewed paper presented at the Australian Association for Research in Education Conference, Brisbane 2014. Published in conference proceedings.
• 2. Anderson, A. (2010). Learning e-Learning: The restructuring of student’s beliefs and assumptions about learning. International Journal of E-Learning, 9(4), 435-461.
• 3. Archer, E., Chetty, Y., & Prinsloo, P. (2014). Benchmarking the habits and behaviours of successful students: A case study of academic-business collaboration. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(1). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1617
• 4. Arts, B., & van Tatenhove, J. (2004). Policy and power: A conceptual framework between the ‘old’ and ‘new’ policy idioms. Policy Sciences, 37(3-4), 339-356.
• 5. Baruque, L. B., & Melo, R. N. (2004). Learning theory and instructional design using learning objects. Journal of Educational Multimedia and Hypermedia, 13(4), 343-370.
• 6. Caspi, A., & Gorsky, P. (2006). Instructional dialogue: distance education students’ dialogic behavior. Studies in Higher Education, 31(6), 735-752. Routledge.
• 7. DeSanctis, G., & Poole, M. S. (1994). Capturing the complexity in advanced technology use: Adaptive structuration theory. Organisation Science, 5(2), 121-147.
• 8. Dillahunt, T., Wang, B., & Teasley, S. (2014). Democratizing higher education: Exploring MOOC use among those who cannot afford a formal education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 15(5). Retrieved on January 20, 2014 from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/1841
• 9. Downes, S. (2007). What connectivism is? [Blog post]. Retrieved from http://halfanhour.blogspot.co.uk/2007/02/what-connectivism-is.html
• 10. Ertmer, P. A., & Newby, T. J. (1993). Behaviorism, Cognitivism, Constructivism: Comparing Critical Features from a Design Perspective. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 6(4), 50-57. Retrieved from http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1937-8327.1993.tb00605.x/abstract[Crossref]
• 11. Findlay, P. (2007). Library Research Methods Divinity Graduate Students. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://library.mcmaster.ca/instruction/divgrad07.pdf
• 12. Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. Berkeley: University of California Press.
• 13. Gokool-Ramdoo, S. (2009). Policy deficit in distance education: A transactional distance. The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 10(4). Retrieved on August 10, 2014 from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/702/1344
• 14. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005a). A critical analysis of transactional distance theory. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 6(1), 1-11.
• 15. Gorsky, P., & Caspi, A. (2005b). Dialogue: A theoretical framework for distance education instructional system. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(2), 137-144.
• 16. Gorsky, P., Caspi, A., & Chajut, E. (2008). The theory of instructional dialogue: Toward a unified theory of instructional design. In Zheng. R & Pixy-Ferris. S. (Eds.), Understanding online instructional modelling: Theories and practices. Hershey, PA: Idea Group, Inc.
• 17. Gourley, B., & Lane, A. (2009). Re‐invigorating openness at The Open University: the role of Open Educational Resources. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 24(1), 57-65. doi: 10.1080/02680510802627845[Crossref]
• 18. Gulati, S. (2008). Technology-enhanced learning in developing nations: A review. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1). Retrieved from http://irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/477/1011
• 19. Halperin, R., & Backhouse, J. (2007). Using structuration theory in IS research: Operationalising key constructs. Paper presented at the 28th International Conference on Information Systems, Montreal, Canada.
• 20. Heeks, R. (2008). ICT4D 2.0: The Next Phase of Applying ICT for International Development. Computer, 41(6), 26-33. doi: 10.1109/mc.2008.192
• 21. HL WIKI International (2014). Research Methods. Retrieved on June 30, 2014 from http://hlwiki.slais.ubc.ca/index.php/Research_methods
• 22. Jonassen, D., Davidson, M., Collins, M., Campbell, J., & Haag, B. (1995). Constructivism and Computer-Mediated Communication in Distance Education. American Journal of Distance Education, 9(2), 7-26. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/08923649509526885#.VrSkxU8u9T4[Crossref]
• 23. Jones, M. R., & Karsten, H. (2008). Giddens’s structuration theory and information systems research. MIS Quarterly, 32(1), 127-157.
• 24. Kop, R., & Hill, A. (2008). Connectivism: Learning theory of the future or vestige of the past? The International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(3). Retrieved from http://www.irrodl.org/index.php/irrodl/article/view/523/1103
• 25. Mahmud, A. (2006). Bringing Information Technology to Rural Bangladesh by Boat. Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation Access to Learning Award Recipient 2005. Washington: Library & Information Resources. Available at http://www.clir.org/pubs/reports/reports/pub136/pub136.pdf
• 26. Moore, M.G. (1993). Theory of transactional distance. In D. Keegan (Ed.), Theoretical principles of distance education. London: Routledge.
• 27. Moore, M., & Kearsley, G. (2005). Distance Education - A systems view. CA: Wadsworth.
• 28. Orlikowski, W. J. (2000). Using technology and constituting structures: A practice lens for studying technology in organisations. Organisation Science, 11(4), 404-428.
• 29. Patton, M. Q. (2015). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Methods (4th ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
• 30. Rashid, B., & Rahman, R. (2010). Strategic Intervention of ODL in Bangladesh. Turkish Online Journal of Distance Education, 11(4), 93-108.
• 31. Rodriguez, O. (2012). MOOCs and the AI-Stanford like Courses: two successful and distinct course formats for massive open online courses. European Journal of Open, Distance, and ELearning, 2012(I). Retrieved on March 10, 2015 from http://www.eurodl.org/materials/contrib/2012/Rodriguez.pdf
• 32. Saba, F., & Shearer, R. L. (1994). Verifying key theoretical concepts in a dynamic model of distance education. The American Journal of Distance Education, 8(1), 36-59.
• 33. Sein, M. K. (2005). Paradigms of ICT in development. IFIP 9.4, Abuja, Nigeria.
• 34. Sein, M. K., & Harindranth, G. (2004). Conceptualizing the ICT artefact: Toward understanding the role of ICT in national development. Information Society, 20(1), 15-24.
• 35. Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.
• 36. Shearer, R. L. (2009). Transactional distance and dialogue in online learning. Paper presented at the 26th annual conference on distance teaching and learning, 2009. The University of Wisconsin. Retrieved from http://www.uwex.edu/disted/conference
• 37. Siemens, G. (2005). Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age. International Journal of Educational Technology & Distance Learning, 2(1). Retrieved October 10, 2014, from http://www.itdl.org/Journal/Jan_05/article01.htm
• 38. Simpson, O. (2013). Student retention in distance education: are we failing our students? Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning, 28(2), 105-119. doi: 10.1080/02680513.2013.847363[Crossref]
• 39. Subotzky, G., & Prinsloo, P. (2011). Turning the tide: a socio-critical model and framework for improving student success in open distance learning at the University of South Africa. Distance Education, 32(2), 177-193. doi: 10.1080/01587919.2011.584846[Crossref]
• 40. van Tatenhove, J., Arts, B., & Leroy, P. (Eds.) (2000). Political Modernisation and the Environment: The Renewal of Environmental Policy Arrangements. Dordrecht, Boston, London: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• 41. Tinio, V. L. (2004). ICT in Education. In UNDP-APDIP (Eds.), The e-ASEAN Task Force e- Primer Series. Retrieved from http://www.unapcict.org/ecohub/resources/
• 42. Tresman, S. (2002). Towards a Strategy for Improved Student Retention in Programmes of Open, Distance Education: A Case Study from the Open University UK. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 3(1).
• 43. Unwin, T. (2009). ICT4D: Information and communication technologies for development. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• 44. Walsham, G. (2002). Cross-cultural software production and use: A structurational analysis. MIS Quarterly, 26(4), 359-380.
• 45. Wheeler-Brooks, J. (2009). Structuration theory and critical consciousness: potential applications for social work practice. Journal of Sociology & Social Welfare, 36(1), 123-140.
• 46. Yin, R. K. (2014). Case study research: Design and methods (5th ed.).Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/eurodl-2016-0002