The phonesthetics of blends: A lexicographic study of cognitive blends in the OED

• Authors: Chris Smith
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

This preliminary study of 285 morphological and cognitive blends (attestation dates 1200-2012) aims to investigate the role of phonesthemes in the structuring of the English lexicon. A study of OED word origins shows a disparity between older (1200-1900) and recent blends (1903-2012). Sound symbolism plays an overriding role in over 50% of older blends, leading to a study of initial phonesthemes (i.e. consonant clusters). Several case studies of diachronic semantic shift attested in the OED point to the existence of multidirectional motivation ties. This preliminary study supports the psycholinguistic theory that 1) there is a structured secondary sound symbolism in English, and that 2) it is still productive today and may play a role in the creation of neologisms as well as ensuring their survival (see Bergen, 2010: 52). A more in-depth usage-based analysis using sophisticated measurement tools is the next step in the study.

Keywords

EN

cognitive blends; the OED; diachronic semantic shift; multidirectional remotivation; phonesthemes

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: ExELL
• Year: 2014
• Volume: 2
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 12-45

Dates

published

2014-10-01

received

2015-02-03

accepted

2015-03-02

online

2016-04-22

Contributors

author

Chris Smith

• CRISCO Université de Caen

References

• Abelin, Åsa (1999). Phonesthemes in Swedish. In Proceedings of XIV International Conference of Phonetic Sciences 99. 1333–1336. Berkeley University of California. (last access 16/08/13).
• Abramova, Ekaterina, Raquel Fernandes, & Frederico Sangati (2013). Automatic labeling of phonesthemic senses. Proceedings of the 35th Annual Cognitive Science Meeting 2013.. (last access 05/01/2014).
• Ahlner, Felix & Jordan Zlatev (2010). Cross modal iconicity: A Cognitive Semiotic Approach to Sound Symbolism. Sign Systems Studies 38: 298–348.
• Albrespit, Jean (2007). Montrer, cacher: la référence construite par les néologismes. L'envers du décor, 47e Congrès de la SAES, 54–73, Avignon.
• Allan, Kathryn (2011). Using OED data as evidence for researching semantic change. Allan, Kathryn & Justinya Robinson, eds. Current Methods in Historical Semantics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 17–40.
• Argoud, Line (2008). Les ‘mots en bl-’ du lexique anglais: étude de la structuration des données dans une optique lexico-cognitive. [bl- words in the English lexicon: lexical-cognitive corpus analysis]. Lexis 2: 43–76.
• Argoud, Line (2010). Réalité des idéophones anglais (phonesthèmes): propositions dans le cadre d’une approche de linguistique cognitive [the reality of English phonesthemes]. E-rea, Revue d'études sur le monde anglophone. . (last access 16/08/13).
• Ayto, John (1999). 20thCentury Words. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Bat-El, Outi (2006). Blend. Brown, E. Keith, ed. Encyclopedia of Language and Linguistics, 2nd edition. Oxford: Elsevier, 2.66–70.
• Bauer, Laurie (1983). English Word Formation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Benczes, Réka (2010). Setting limits in the production and use of metaphorical and metonymical compounds. Onysko, Alexander & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 219–242.
• Bergen, Benjamin K. (2004). The psychological reality of phonaesthemes. Language 80.2 : 291–311.
• Bergen, Benjamin K. (2010). Phonesthemes: Frequency and psychological reality. Paper given at the Emory University Conference workshop. Sound Symbolism: Challenging the Arbitrariness of Language. 26-27 March 2010. . (last access 16/08/13).
• Bolinger, Dwight L. (1950). Rime, assonance and morpheme analysis. Word 6.2: 117–136.
• Bolinger, Dwight L. (1965). Forms of English: Accent, Morpheme, Order. Isamu Abe & Tetsuya Kanekiyo, eds. Cambridge & Tokyo: Harvard University Press & Hokuou.
• Bottineau, Didier (2008). The submorphemic conjecture in English: towards a distributed model of the cognitive dynamics of submorphemes. Lexis 2: 19–42.
• Boussidan, Armelle, Eyal Sagi, & Sabine Ploux (2009). Phonaesthemic and Etymological effects on the Distribution of Senses in Statistical Models of Semantics. Proceedings of the 34th Cognitive Science Annual Meeting 2009, 36–40.
• Bragdon, Janice (2008). Blends. Manuscript, University of Florida, Gainesville.
• De Cuypere, Ludovic (2008). Limiting the iconic: from the metatheoretical foundations to the creative possibilities of iconicity in language. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins.
• Drellishak, Scott (2006). Statistical techniques for detecting and validating phonesthemes. LSA Annual Meeting. Anaheim, CA.
• Fill, Alwin (2004). Remotivation and reinterpretation. Booij, Geert, Christian Lehmann & Joachim Mugdan, eds. Morphologie: ein internationales Handbuch zur Flexion und Wortbuildung. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 1615–1625.
• Glynn, Dylan (2010). Corpus-driven Cognitive semantics. Introduction to the field. Glynn Dylan & Kerstin Fischer, eds. Quantitative Methods in Cognitive Semantics. Corpusdriven approaches. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter, 1–42.
• Glynn, Dylan (2014a). Correspondence analysis. An exploratory technique for identifying usage patterns. Glynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 133–179.
• Glynn, Dylan (2014b). Techniques and tools. Corpus methods and statistics for semantics. Glynn, Dylan & Justyna A. Robinson, eds. Corpus Methods for Semantics. Quantitative Studies in Polysemy and Synonymy. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 307–341.
• Gries, Stefan (2004). Isn’t that fantabulous? How similarity motivates intentional morphological blends in English. Achard, Michel & Suzanne Kemmer, eds. Language, Culture, and Mind. Stanford, CA: CSLI, 415–428.
• Hock, Hans Heinrich, & Brian Joseph (2009). Language History, Language Change and Language Relationship: An Introduction to Historical and Comparative Linguistics. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter. Reprint [1996].
• Joseph, Brian (1997). On the linguistics of marginality: the centrality of the periphery. Chicago Linguistic Society Language Arts & Disciplines. . (last access 16/08/13).
• Katamba, Francis (2005). English Words. London: Routledge. 2nd edition. Reprint [1994].
• Kaisse, Ellen M. (2005). Word Formation and Phonology. Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 25–47.
• Kelly, Michael H. (1998). To brunch or to brench: Some aspects of blend structure. Linguistics 36.3: 579-590.
• Kemmer, Suzanne (2003). Schemas and lexical blends. Cuyckens, Hubert, Thomas Berg, René Dirven & Klaus-Uwe Panther, eds. Motivation in Language: Studies in Honour of Günther Radden. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 69–97.
• Kilgariff Adam, & Pavel Rychly. Sketch Engine, Lexical Computing Limited. .
• Lehrer, Adrienne (2007). Blendalicious. Munat, Judith, ed. Lexical Creativity, Texts and Contexts. Amsterdam & Philadelphia: John Benjamins, 115–133.
• Luce, Paul A. & David B. Pisoni (1998). Recognizing spoken words: The neighborhood activation model. Ear and Hearing 19 : 1–36.
• Marchand, Hans (1969). The Categories and Types of Present-Day English Word-Formation, A Synchronic-Diachronic Approach. 2nd edition. München: C.H. Beck’sche Verlagsbuchhandlung.
• Martin, Andrew (2007). The Evolving Lexicon. PhD dissertation UCLA. Manuscript. . (last access 16/08/13).
• Miller, D. Gary (2010). Language Change and Linguistic Theory. 2 vols. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Miller, D. Gary (2014). Lexicogenesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Ohala, John (1997). Sound Symbolism. Seoul International Conference on Linguistics (SICOL) 4: 98–103.
• Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel (2010). Unravelling the cognitive in word formation. Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation. Berlin & New York: De Gruyter, 1–25.
• Otis, Katya, & Eyal Sagi (2008). Phonaesthemes: A corpora-based analysis. Love, Bradley, C., Ken McRae, & Vladimir M. Sloutsky, eds. Proceedings of the 30th Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society. 65-70 Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society, 65–70.
• Philps, Dennis (2008a). Submorphemic iconicity in the lexicon: a diachronic approach to English ‘gn’ words. Lexis 2: 125–139.
• Philps, Dennis (2008b). From mouth to eye. Smith, Andrew D., Kenny Smith, & Ramon Ferreri Cancho, eds. The Evolution of Language. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing, 251–258.
• Pinker, Stephen (2008). The Stuff of Thought: Language as a Window into Human Nature, London: Penguin.
• Plag, Ingo (2003). Word-Formation in English. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Ploux, Sabine, Armelle Boussidan, & Hyungsuk Ji (2010). The Semantic Atlas: an interactive model of lexical representation. Proceedings of the seventh conference of International Language Resources and Evaluation, Valletta, Malta. N. Calzolari, Nicoletta, Khalid Choukri, Bente Maegaard, Joseph Mariani, Jan Odjik, Stelios Piperidis, Mike Rosner, & Daniel Tapias, eds., European Language Resources Association (ELRA).
• Ploux, Sabine. The Semantic Atlas. Institut des Sciences Cognitives, CNRS - University Lyon 1 - UMR 5015. . (last access January 2014).
• Pound, Louise (1914). Blends, their relation to English word formation. Anglistische Forschungen 42: 1–58.
• Quinion, Michael (1996). Through The Blender. (last access 16/08/13).
• Reay, Irene Elizabeth (2009). Sound symbolism. Allan, Keith, ed. Concise Encyclopedia of Semantics. Oxford: Elsevier, 893-901. Reprint [1994].
• Renouf, Antoinette (2013). A finer definition of neology English: the life-cycle of a word. In Hasselgard, Hilde, Jarle Ebeling & Signe Oksefjell Ebeling (eds.), Corpus Perspectives on Patterns of Lexis, 177–208. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
• Smith, Chris (nd). Tracking historical semantic shift in fl- monomorphemes in the OED. MS.
• Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. (2005). Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Szymanek, Bogdan (2005). The latest trends in English word-formation. Štekauer, Pavol & Rochelle Lieber, eds. Handbook of Word-Formation. Dordrecht: Springer, 429-448.
• Tournier, Jean (2007). Introduction descriptive à la lexicogénétique de l’anglais contemporain. Paris & Geneva: Champion-Slatkine. Reprint [1985].
• Turney, Peter D., & Patrick Pantel (2010). From frequency to meaning: Vector Space Models of semantics. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research 37 : 141–188.
• Umbreit, Birgit (2010). Does love come from to love or to love from love? Why lexical motivation has to be regarded as bidirectional. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation, Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel (eds.), 301–333. Berlin/New York: Walter de Gruyter.
• Veale, Tony & Cristina Butnariu (2010). Harvesting and understanding on-line neologisms. Onysko, Alexander, & Sascha Michel, eds. Cognitive Perspectives on Word Formation,. Berlin & New York: Walter de Gruyter, 399-420.
• Waugh, Linda R. (1979). On the sound shape of language. Jakobson, Roman & Linda R. Waugh, eds. The Sound Shape of Language. Bloomington, Ind. & London: Indiana University Press & Harvester, 198-214.
• Waugh, Linda R. (1994). Degrees of iconicity. Journal of Pragmatics 22 : 55–70.

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/exell-2016-0002