Economy, Knowledge, Families: Practices of Appropriation

• Authors: Elena Bougleux
• Languages of publication: EN

Abstracts

EN

The expansion process of a Western multinational corporation in India is investigated using ethnographic tools. In particular the paper deals with the processes of knowledge appropriation enacted by the Indian workforce employed at the Research & Development Center in Bangalore. Young Indian professionals in the early stages of their scientific or corporate careers seem to take advantage of the investments that the corporation makes in the competitive Indian industrial district, by frequently changing job and finding new positions. The underlying strategy is that of subtracting competences and applied knowledge from the corporation in order to appropriate them and then reinvest them locally and more profitably. Working for a multinational corporation is investigated in its material and metaphorical dimensions, demonstrating the methodological shift required to analyze a very large productive organization through the eyes of its employees. One consequence of scaling down in the ethnographic analysis is that the family is introduced as an economic actor contributing to shaping decisions and public policies.

Keywords

EN

corporation; knowledge; development; family; ethnography

• Publisher: Sciendo
• Journal: Human Affairs
• Year: 2015
• Volume: 25
• Issue: 1
• Pages: 3-15

Dates

published

2015-01-01

online

2014-12-30

Contributors

author

Elena Bougleux

• Department of Social and Human Studies, University of Bergamo, Piazzale Sant’Agostino, 2

References

• Amselle, J.L. (2008). L’Occident décroché: Enqu te sur les postcolonialismes. Paris: Stock.
• Arnold, D. (2000). Science, technology and medicine in colonial India. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Bhabha, H. K. (Ed.). (1990). Nation and narration. London and New York: Routledge.
• Bougleux, E. (2009). Scientific methods and creative practices. Evaluation of constraints and possibilities in an experimental research environment. World Futures, 65, 560-567;
• Bougleux, E. (2012a). Exploring knowledge flows in a multinational corporation. World Futures, 68,188-196;
• Bougleux , E. (2012b). Soggetti egemoni e saperi subalterni. Etnografia in una multinazionale dell’energia. Firenze: Nardini.
• Crouch, C. (2011). The strange non-death of neo-liberalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.
• Czarniawska, B. (1998). A narrative approach to organization studies. Qualitative Research Methods, 43. London: Sage.
• Das, V. (1998). Structure and cognition: Aspects of Hindu caste and ritual. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
• Dirks, N. (2001). Castes of mind: colonialism and the making of modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Fischer, M. J. (2009). Anthropological futures. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
• Foster, R. (2010). Corporate oxymoron and the anthropology of corporations. Dialectical Anthropology, 34, 95-102.
• Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J., & Terrell, K. (2010). Globalization and innovation in emerging markets. American Economic Journal - Macroeconomics, 2, 194-226.[WoS]
• Guha, R. (1998). Dominance without hegemony: History and power in colonial India. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Gupta, A., & Sivaramakrishnan, K. (2010). The Indian state after liberalization. Los Angeles: Routledge.
• Harding, S. (2008). Sciences from below. Postcolonialities and modernities. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
• Ilavarasan, P. (2007). Is software work in India task fragmented? A study of software workers in Bangalore. Sociological Bulletin, 56, 383-400.
• Keniston, K., & Kumar, D. (2004). IT experience in India. Bridging the digital divide. New Delhi: Sage.
• Knorr Cetina, K. (1999). Epistemic cultures: How the sciences make knowledge. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• MacLeod, R. (Ed.). (2000). Nature and empire: Science and the colonial enterprise. Osiris, vol. 15.
• Nader, L. (1996). Naked science: Anthropological inquiry into boundaries, power and knowledge. London: Routledge.
• Nisbett, N. (2007). Friendship, consumption, morality: Practising identity, negotiating hierarchy in middle-class Bangalore. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 13, 935-950.
• Nussbaum, M. C. (2009). The clash within: Democracy, religious violence, and India’s future.Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• OECD Observer (2009). Globalisation and emerging economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• OECD (2011). Science, technology and industry scoreboard 2011: Innovation and growth in knowledge economies. Paris: OECD Publishing.
• Polanyi, K. (1971). The great transformation: The political and economic origins of our time. London: Beacon Press.
• Prakash, G. (1992). Science “gone native” in colonial India. Representations, 40, 153-178.
• Prakash, G. (1999). Another reason. Science and imagination in modern India. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
• Radhakrishnan, S. (2008). Examining the “global” Indian middle class: Gender and culture in the Silicon Valley/Bangalore Circuit. Journal of Intercultural Studies, 29, 7-20.
• Sapienza, P., Guiso, L., & Zingales, L. (2006). Does culture affect economic outcomes? Journal of Economic Perspective, 20(2), 23-48.
• Seal, A. (1968). The emergence of Indian nationalism: Competition and collaboration in the later nineteenth century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
• Sen, A. (1991). On ethics and economics. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing.
• Sen, A. (2000). Development as freedom. New York: Anchor.
• Sivaramakrishnan, K., & Agrawal, A. (2003). Regional modernities: The cultural politics of development in India. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
• Spivak, G. C. (1999). A critique of postcolonial reason: Toward a history of the vanishing present. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
• Stiglitz, J. E. (2000). Making globalization work. New York: W. W. Norton & Company.
• Stiglitz, J.E. (2003). Globalization and its discontents. New York: W.W. Norton & Company [WoS]

Identifiers

DOI

10.1515/humaff-2015-0001